使用亚胺基共价有机框架的表面打印和3D喷墨打印应用的环境影响分析:生命周期评估研究

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Juan J. Espada , Rosalía Rodríguez , Alejandro de la Peña , Mar Ramos , José L. Segura , Esther M. Sánchez-Carnerero
{"title":"使用亚胺基共价有机框架的表面打印和3D喷墨打印应用的环境影响分析:生命周期评估研究","authors":"Juan J. Espada ,&nbsp;Rosalía Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Alejandro de la Peña ,&nbsp;Mar Ramos ,&nbsp;José L. Segura ,&nbsp;Esther M. Sánchez-Carnerero","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are emerging materials with structural modularity that allows their application in many fields. The aim of this work is to determine the environmental impact of using an imine based covalent organic framework <strong>(RT-COF-1)</strong> for both surface printing (Case A) and 3D inkjet printing (Case B) by applying Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. Experimental data on <strong>RT-COF-1</strong> synthesis as well as results obtained by simulation of their precursors production, 1,3,5-tris-(4-aminophenyl) benzene (<strong>TAPB</strong>) and 1,3,5-benzenetricarbaldehyde (<strong>BTCA</strong>), are used. LCA results show that monomer synthesis is the most important contributor to environmental impacts in both case studies. On the other hand, the contribution of solvents used in Case A is also remarkable. The comparison between both case studies indicates that the environmental impacts of Case B is lower than that of Case A (reduction within 5%–65%). Finally, LCA results of Case B are compared to other materials used for 3D-printing, such as polymerizable ionic liquids (PILs). The results show that <strong>RT–COF–1</strong> compares favourably with PILs in five of nine impact categories, being especially relevant the reductions achieved in the abiotic depletion and acidification potential (&gt;90%), in the primary energy consumption (⁓35%) and carbon footprint (⁓50%), suggesting the potential of <strong>RT–COF–1</strong> as 3D-printing material from an environmental perspective. This work is a first step for further research to highlight the main environmental burdens of using COF-based materials in this application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"395 ","pages":"Article 136381"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental impact analysis of surface printing and 3D inkjet printing applications using an imine based covalent organic framework: A life cycle assessment study\",\"authors\":\"Juan J. Espada ,&nbsp;Rosalía Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Alejandro de la Peña ,&nbsp;Mar Ramos ,&nbsp;José L. Segura ,&nbsp;Esther M. Sánchez-Carnerero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136381\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are emerging materials with structural modularity that allows their application in many fields. The aim of this work is to determine the environmental impact of using an imine based covalent organic framework <strong>(RT-COF-1)</strong> for both surface printing (Case A) and 3D inkjet printing (Case B) by applying Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. Experimental data on <strong>RT-COF-1</strong> synthesis as well as results obtained by simulation of their precursors production, 1,3,5-tris-(4-aminophenyl) benzene (<strong>TAPB</strong>) and 1,3,5-benzenetricarbaldehyde (<strong>BTCA</strong>), are used. LCA results show that monomer synthesis is the most important contributor to environmental impacts in both case studies. On the other hand, the contribution of solvents used in Case A is also remarkable. The comparison between both case studies indicates that the environmental impacts of Case B is lower than that of Case A (reduction within 5%–65%). Finally, LCA results of Case B are compared to other materials used for 3D-printing, such as polymerizable ionic liquids (PILs). The results show that <strong>RT–COF–1</strong> compares favourably with PILs in five of nine impact categories, being especially relevant the reductions achieved in the abiotic depletion and acidification potential (&gt;90%), in the primary energy consumption (⁓35%) and carbon footprint (⁓50%), suggesting the potential of <strong>RT–COF–1</strong> as 3D-printing material from an environmental perspective. This work is a first step for further research to highlight the main environmental burdens of using COF-based materials in this application.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"395 \",\"pages\":\"Article 136381\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623005395\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652623005395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

共价有机框架(COFs)是一种具有模块化结构的新兴材料,可以在许多领域得到应用。这项工作的目的是通过应用生命周期评估(LCA)方法确定在表面打印(案例A)和3D喷墨打印(案例B)中使用亚胺基共价有机框架(RT-COF-1)对环境的影响。本文使用了RT-COF-1合成的实验数据以及它们的前体1,3,5-三-(4-氨基苯基)苯(TAPB)和1,3,5-苯三醛(BTCA)的模拟结果。LCA结果表明,单体合成是两个案例中最重要的环境影响因素。另一方面,在情况A中使用的溶剂的贡献也是显著的。两个案例研究的对比表明,案例B的环境影响低于案例A(减少幅度在5%-65%之间)。最后,案例B的LCA结果与用于3d打印的其他材料(如可聚合离子液体(pil))进行了比较。结果表明,RT-COF-1在9个影响类别中的5个方面都优于pil,特别是在非生物耗损和酸化潜力(>90%),一次能源消耗(⁓35%)和碳足迹(⁓50%)方面所取得的减少,这表明从环境角度来看,RT-COF-1作为3d打印材料的潜力。这项工作是进一步研究的第一步,以突出在该应用中使用cof基材料的主要环境负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Environmental impact analysis of surface printing and 3D inkjet printing applications using an imine based covalent organic framework: A life cycle assessment study

Environmental impact analysis of surface printing and 3D inkjet printing applications using an imine based covalent organic framework: A life cycle assessment study

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are emerging materials with structural modularity that allows their application in many fields. The aim of this work is to determine the environmental impact of using an imine based covalent organic framework (RT-COF-1) for both surface printing (Case A) and 3D inkjet printing (Case B) by applying Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology. Experimental data on RT-COF-1 synthesis as well as results obtained by simulation of their precursors production, 1,3,5-tris-(4-aminophenyl) benzene (TAPB) and 1,3,5-benzenetricarbaldehyde (BTCA), are used. LCA results show that monomer synthesis is the most important contributor to environmental impacts in both case studies. On the other hand, the contribution of solvents used in Case A is also remarkable. The comparison between both case studies indicates that the environmental impacts of Case B is lower than that of Case A (reduction within 5%–65%). Finally, LCA results of Case B are compared to other materials used for 3D-printing, such as polymerizable ionic liquids (PILs). The results show that RT–COF–1 compares favourably with PILs in five of nine impact categories, being especially relevant the reductions achieved in the abiotic depletion and acidification potential (>90%), in the primary energy consumption (⁓35%) and carbon footprint (⁓50%), suggesting the potential of RT–COF–1 as 3D-printing material from an environmental perspective. This work is a first step for further research to highlight the main environmental burdens of using COF-based materials in this application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信