儿童头部损伤后的神经心理缺陷。

Journal of clinical neuropsychology Pub Date : 1984-08-01
H W Winogron, R M Knights, H N Bawden
{"title":"儿童头部损伤后的神经心理缺陷。","authors":"H W Winogron,&nbsp;R M Knights,&nbsp;H N Bawden","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children who had sustained head injuries were divided into three groups on the basis of severity of injury defined according to neurological criteria, and their performance on a battery of neuropsychological tests was compared. The groups were matched for age and sex. Performance IQ and timed tests of motor speed, fine-motor coordination, tactual-spatial functions, and verbal fluency showed significantly greater deficits for severely injured patients than for those who were mildly or moderately injured. Relations between neurologic indices of severity of injury and psychological outcome measures were investigated. Glasgow Coma Scale severity scores and the duration of altered consciousness were related to performance on several major neuropsychological functions. Acute intracranial pressure measures were unrelated to outcome. Comparisons of neuropsychological profiles indicated that the pattern of deficit after severe head injury is more distinctive than are those after mild and moderate injuries. Deficit patterns were least similar for the mild and severe groups, and were most similar for the mild and moderate groups. Results were discussed in terms of their prognostic utility, and suggestions were made for the future study of neurologic-psychologic relations after head injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":79225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","volume":"6 3","pages":"267-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychological deficits following head injury in children.\",\"authors\":\"H W Winogron,&nbsp;R M Knights,&nbsp;H N Bawden\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Children who had sustained head injuries were divided into three groups on the basis of severity of injury defined according to neurological criteria, and their performance on a battery of neuropsychological tests was compared. The groups were matched for age and sex. Performance IQ and timed tests of motor speed, fine-motor coordination, tactual-spatial functions, and verbal fluency showed significantly greater deficits for severely injured patients than for those who were mildly or moderately injured. Relations between neurologic indices of severity of injury and psychological outcome measures were investigated. Glasgow Coma Scale severity scores and the duration of altered consciousness were related to performance on several major neuropsychological functions. Acute intracranial pressure measures were unrelated to outcome. Comparisons of neuropsychological profiles indicated that the pattern of deficit after severe head injury is more distinctive than are those after mild and moderate injuries. Deficit patterns were least similar for the mild and severe groups, and were most similar for the mild and moderate groups. Results were discussed in terms of their prognostic utility, and suggestions were made for the future study of neurologic-psychologic relations after head injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"267-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据神经学标准定义的损伤严重程度,将持续头部受伤的儿童分为三组,并比较他们在一系列神经心理学测试中的表现。各组按年龄和性别进行匹配。表现智商和运动速度、精细运动协调、触觉空间功能和语言流畅性的定时测试显示,严重受伤患者的缺陷明显大于轻度或中度受伤患者。研究损伤程度的神经学指标与心理预后指标之间的关系。格拉斯哥昏迷量表严重程度评分和意识改变的持续时间与几个主要神经心理功能的表现有关。急性颅内压测量与结果无关。神经心理特征的比较表明,重型颅脑损伤后的缺陷模式比轻中度颅脑损伤后的缺陷模式更明显。轻度组和重度组的缺陷模式最不相似,轻度组和中度组的缺陷模式最相似。讨论了这些结果对预后的影响,并对今后颅脑损伤后神经-心理关系的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuropsychological deficits following head injury in children.

Children who had sustained head injuries were divided into three groups on the basis of severity of injury defined according to neurological criteria, and their performance on a battery of neuropsychological tests was compared. The groups were matched for age and sex. Performance IQ and timed tests of motor speed, fine-motor coordination, tactual-spatial functions, and verbal fluency showed significantly greater deficits for severely injured patients than for those who were mildly or moderately injured. Relations between neurologic indices of severity of injury and psychological outcome measures were investigated. Glasgow Coma Scale severity scores and the duration of altered consciousness were related to performance on several major neuropsychological functions. Acute intracranial pressure measures were unrelated to outcome. Comparisons of neuropsychological profiles indicated that the pattern of deficit after severe head injury is more distinctive than are those after mild and moderate injuries. Deficit patterns were least similar for the mild and severe groups, and were most similar for the mild and moderate groups. Results were discussed in terms of their prognostic utility, and suggestions were made for the future study of neurologic-psychologic relations after head injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信