【扎地腾糖浆治疗儿童支气管哮喘的临床评价】。

Problemy medycyny wieku rozwojowego Pub Date : 1983-01-01
A Sciślicki, J Rudnik, J Gaweł, A Lukasik, R Werys, S Matoga, H Brański
{"title":"【扎地腾糖浆治疗儿童支气管哮喘的临床评价】。","authors":"A Sciślicki,&nbsp;J Rudnik,&nbsp;J Gaweł,&nbsp;A Lukasik,&nbsp;R Werys,&nbsp;S Matoga,&nbsp;H Brański","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>60 children with atopic asthma were included to the doubleblind study, in order to compare Zaditen and Clemastine. The trial was completed after 12 weeks of treatment. The efficacy was evaluated on the basis of clinical observation, lung function measurements and laboratory data. The Zaditen was shown to have more beneficial clinical effect on studied group than Clemastine. The lung function measurements before and after treatment did not showed much difference, although a significant decrease of the nonspecific bronchial reactivity to histamine was observed in the group receiving Zaditen . This was observed shortly after beginning of the treatment up to 6 weeks. Zaditen sirup was well tolerated and the only side effect observed was a significant weight increase, which could be explained by the elevation of serum sodium ions concentration.</p>","PeriodicalId":76348,"journal":{"name":"Problemy medycyny wieku rozwojowego","volume":"12 ","pages":"131-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical evaluation of Zaditen syrup in the treatment of children with bronchial asthma].\",\"authors\":\"A Sciślicki,&nbsp;J Rudnik,&nbsp;J Gaweł,&nbsp;A Lukasik,&nbsp;R Werys,&nbsp;S Matoga,&nbsp;H Brański\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>60 children with atopic asthma were included to the doubleblind study, in order to compare Zaditen and Clemastine. The trial was completed after 12 weeks of treatment. The efficacy was evaluated on the basis of clinical observation, lung function measurements and laboratory data. The Zaditen was shown to have more beneficial clinical effect on studied group than Clemastine. The lung function measurements before and after treatment did not showed much difference, although a significant decrease of the nonspecific bronchial reactivity to histamine was observed in the group receiving Zaditen . This was observed shortly after beginning of the treatment up to 6 weeks. Zaditen sirup was well tolerated and the only side effect observed was a significant weight increase, which could be explained by the elevation of serum sodium ions concentration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problemy medycyny wieku rozwojowego\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"131-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problemy medycyny wieku rozwojowego\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy medycyny wieku rozwojowego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将60例特应性哮喘患儿纳入双盲研究,以比较Zaditen和Clemastine。试验在治疗12周后完成。根据临床观察、肺功能测定及实验室资料评价疗效。研究表明,扎狄顿比克莱曼汀具有更有利的临床效果。治疗前后的肺功能测量没有显示出太大差异,尽管在服用Zaditen的组中观察到非特异性支气管对组胺的反应性显著降低。这是在治疗开始后6周内观察到的。Zaditen糖浆耐受性良好,唯一的副作用是体重明显增加,这可以通过血清钠离子浓度升高来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Clinical evaluation of Zaditen syrup in the treatment of children with bronchial asthma].

60 children with atopic asthma were included to the doubleblind study, in order to compare Zaditen and Clemastine. The trial was completed after 12 weeks of treatment. The efficacy was evaluated on the basis of clinical observation, lung function measurements and laboratory data. The Zaditen was shown to have more beneficial clinical effect on studied group than Clemastine. The lung function measurements before and after treatment did not showed much difference, although a significant decrease of the nonspecific bronchial reactivity to histamine was observed in the group receiving Zaditen . This was observed shortly after beginning of the treatment up to 6 weeks. Zaditen sirup was well tolerated and the only side effect observed was a significant weight increase, which could be explained by the elevation of serum sodium ions concentration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信