血液学质量控制的历史回顾。

F S Allison
{"title":"血液学质量控制的历史回顾。","authors":"F S Allison","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the use of laboratory techniques in diagnostic medicine increase, it became obvious that standardized reference methods and stable controls were essential in order for results obtained in different laboratories to be comparable. Certain procedures and standards have been adopted to provide QC in hematology. Currently procedures include the following: cyanmethemoglobin for HGB determinations; particle counter for RBC and WBC counts; phase microscopy for PLT counts; and packed cell volume for HCT determinations. These serve as acceptable reference methods for multichannel hematology instruments. Instruments that are used must be carefully calibrated. Calibration of the spectrophotometer should be performed using an acceptable standard for hemoglobin. Calibration of the particle counter to determine RBC and WBC counts should be performed using a fresh sample of anticoagulated (EDTA) blood. PLT counting by phase hemacytometry should be used to obtain reference values for automated PLT counters. Centrifuges that are used to obtain microhematocrit values should be calibrated for maximum packing times and times checked against an electric clock. After the instruments have been calibrated, fresh whole blood is measured to determine a target value for each determination. Primary calibration of multichannel instruments is performed by calibrating each parameter to the target value. This is performed initially and then once each week. Two techniques that are commonly used to monitor instrument performance are: 1) the use of at least two levels of commercially prepared control samples to prepare either Levey-Jennings charts or the simple Cusum charts, which detect presymptomatic instrument problems; and/or 2) the use of 500-1,000 patient indices and mean WBC counts analyzed by the XB statistic to establish limits for monitoring instrument performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":76595,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of medical technology","volume":"49 9","pages":"625-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An historical review of quality control in hematology.\",\"authors\":\"F S Allison\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As the use of laboratory techniques in diagnostic medicine increase, it became obvious that standardized reference methods and stable controls were essential in order for results obtained in different laboratories to be comparable. Certain procedures and standards have been adopted to provide QC in hematology. Currently procedures include the following: cyanmethemoglobin for HGB determinations; particle counter for RBC and WBC counts; phase microscopy for PLT counts; and packed cell volume for HCT determinations. These serve as acceptable reference methods for multichannel hematology instruments. Instruments that are used must be carefully calibrated. Calibration of the spectrophotometer should be performed using an acceptable standard for hemoglobin. Calibration of the particle counter to determine RBC and WBC counts should be performed using a fresh sample of anticoagulated (EDTA) blood. PLT counting by phase hemacytometry should be used to obtain reference values for automated PLT counters. Centrifuges that are used to obtain microhematocrit values should be calibrated for maximum packing times and times checked against an electric clock. After the instruments have been calibrated, fresh whole blood is measured to determine a target value for each determination. Primary calibration of multichannel instruments is performed by calibrating each parameter to the target value. This is performed initially and then once each week. Two techniques that are commonly used to monitor instrument performance are: 1) the use of at least two levels of commercially prepared control samples to prepare either Levey-Jennings charts or the simple Cusum charts, which detect presymptomatic instrument problems; and/or 2) the use of 500-1,000 patient indices and mean WBC counts analyzed by the XB statistic to establish limits for monitoring instrument performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of medical technology\",\"volume\":\"49 9\",\"pages\":\"625-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of medical technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着在诊断医学中使用实验室技术的增加,为了使不同实验室获得的结果具有可比性,标准化的参考方法和稳定的对照显然是必不可少的。某些程序和标准已被采用以提供血液学中的质量控制。目前的方法包括:用于HGB测定的氰高铁血红蛋白;红细胞和白细胞计数粒子计数器;相显微镜用于PLT计数;和填充细胞体积用于HCT测定。这些可作为多通道血液学仪器可接受的参考方法。所使用的仪器必须仔细校准。分光光度计的校准应使用可接受的血红蛋白标准进行。校准粒子计数器以确定红细胞和白细胞计数应使用新鲜的抗凝血(EDTA)样本进行。应使用相血细胞计数法进行PLT计数,以获得自动PLT计数器的参考值。用于获得微红细胞压积值的离心机应校准最大包装时间,并根据电子钟检查时间。仪器校准后,测量新鲜全血,以确定每次测定的目标值。多通道仪器的初级校准是通过将各参数校准到目标值来完成的。最初进行一次,然后每周进行一次。通常用于监测仪器性能的两种技术是:1)使用至少两层商业制备的对照样品来制备列维-詹宁斯图或简单的Cusum图,用于检测症状前仪器问题;和/或2)使用500-1,000例患者指数和XB统计分析的平均白细胞计数来确定监测仪器性能的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An historical review of quality control in hematology.

As the use of laboratory techniques in diagnostic medicine increase, it became obvious that standardized reference methods and stable controls were essential in order for results obtained in different laboratories to be comparable. Certain procedures and standards have been adopted to provide QC in hematology. Currently procedures include the following: cyanmethemoglobin for HGB determinations; particle counter for RBC and WBC counts; phase microscopy for PLT counts; and packed cell volume for HCT determinations. These serve as acceptable reference methods for multichannel hematology instruments. Instruments that are used must be carefully calibrated. Calibration of the spectrophotometer should be performed using an acceptable standard for hemoglobin. Calibration of the particle counter to determine RBC and WBC counts should be performed using a fresh sample of anticoagulated (EDTA) blood. PLT counting by phase hemacytometry should be used to obtain reference values for automated PLT counters. Centrifuges that are used to obtain microhematocrit values should be calibrated for maximum packing times and times checked against an electric clock. After the instruments have been calibrated, fresh whole blood is measured to determine a target value for each determination. Primary calibration of multichannel instruments is performed by calibrating each parameter to the target value. This is performed initially and then once each week. Two techniques that are commonly used to monitor instrument performance are: 1) the use of at least two levels of commercially prepared control samples to prepare either Levey-Jennings charts or the simple Cusum charts, which detect presymptomatic instrument problems; and/or 2) the use of 500-1,000 patient indices and mean WBC counts analyzed by the XB statistic to establish limits for monitoring instrument performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信