Lewis及其他血型系统对肾移植的影响。

V Lenhard, B Hansen, D Roelcke, K Dreikorn, P Wernet, H Bockhorn, W Fassbinder, R F Fetta, H Wilms, B Gumbel, F W Albert, R W Ewald, I Sprenger-Klasen, S F Goldmann
{"title":"Lewis及其他血型系统对肾移植的影响。","authors":"V Lenhard,&nbsp;B Hansen,&nbsp;D Roelcke,&nbsp;K Dreikorn,&nbsp;P Wernet,&nbsp;H Bockhorn,&nbsp;W Fassbinder,&nbsp;R F Fetta,&nbsp;H Wilms,&nbsp;B Gumbel,&nbsp;F W Albert,&nbsp;R W Ewald,&nbsp;I Sprenger-Klasen,&nbsp;S F Goldmann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 167 first cadaver kidney recipients and their donors the blood groups ABO, Rhesus, Lewis, MN, Ss, P, Kell and Duffy were determined. The influence of incompatibility in each system as well as of simultaneous presence of several mismatches was analysed. Whereas one-year graft survival of Lewis-compatible grafts was 67 per cent (p = 0.02). The other blood groups showed no significant effect on graft outcome. Cumulative red cell incompatibilities, however, led to decreased survival rates. One-year graft survival in the group with greater than or equal to 4 incompatibilities was only 51 per cent versus 69 per cent in transplants with less than 4 incompatibilities (18% difference, p less than 0.01). When the Lewis system was excluded from analysis, the difference in survival rates was reduced to only six per cent. These data indicate that cumulative incompatibilities of red cell antigens have an unfavourable effect on graft survival. Of the different blood groups, the Lewis system is of major importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":76354,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association","volume":"19 ","pages":"432-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Lewis and other blood group systems in kidney transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"V Lenhard,&nbsp;B Hansen,&nbsp;D Roelcke,&nbsp;K Dreikorn,&nbsp;P Wernet,&nbsp;H Bockhorn,&nbsp;W Fassbinder,&nbsp;R F Fetta,&nbsp;H Wilms,&nbsp;B Gumbel,&nbsp;F W Albert,&nbsp;R W Ewald,&nbsp;I Sprenger-Klasen,&nbsp;S F Goldmann\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 167 first cadaver kidney recipients and their donors the blood groups ABO, Rhesus, Lewis, MN, Ss, P, Kell and Duffy were determined. The influence of incompatibility in each system as well as of simultaneous presence of several mismatches was analysed. Whereas one-year graft survival of Lewis-compatible grafts was 67 per cent (p = 0.02). The other blood groups showed no significant effect on graft outcome. Cumulative red cell incompatibilities, however, led to decreased survival rates. One-year graft survival in the group with greater than or equal to 4 incompatibilities was only 51 per cent versus 69 per cent in transplants with less than 4 incompatibilities (18% difference, p less than 0.01). When the Lewis system was excluded from analysis, the difference in survival rates was reduced to only six per cent. These data indicate that cumulative incompatibilities of red cell antigens have an unfavourable effect on graft survival. Of the different blood groups, the Lewis system is of major importance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"432-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对167例首次接受肾移植者及其供者进行ABO、Rhesus、Lewis、MN、Ss、P、Kell和Duffy血型测定。分析了各体系不相容以及同时存在几种不匹配的影响。而lewis相容移植物一年存活率为67% (p = 0.02)。其他血型对移植物预后无显著影响。然而,累积的红细胞不相容导致存活率下降。大于或等于4个不相容组的一年移植存活率仅为51%,而小于4个不相容组的移植存活率为69%(差异18%,p < 0.01)。当Lewis系统被排除在分析之外时,存活率的差异减少到只有6%。这些数据表明,红细胞抗原的累积不相容性对移植物存活有不利影响。在不同的血型中,刘易斯系统是最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Lewis and other blood group systems in kidney transplantation.

In 167 first cadaver kidney recipients and their donors the blood groups ABO, Rhesus, Lewis, MN, Ss, P, Kell and Duffy were determined. The influence of incompatibility in each system as well as of simultaneous presence of several mismatches was analysed. Whereas one-year graft survival of Lewis-compatible grafts was 67 per cent (p = 0.02). The other blood groups showed no significant effect on graft outcome. Cumulative red cell incompatibilities, however, led to decreased survival rates. One-year graft survival in the group with greater than or equal to 4 incompatibilities was only 51 per cent versus 69 per cent in transplants with less than 4 incompatibilities (18% difference, p less than 0.01). When the Lewis system was excluded from analysis, the difference in survival rates was reduced to only six per cent. These data indicate that cumulative incompatibilities of red cell antigens have an unfavourable effect on graft survival. Of the different blood groups, the Lewis system is of major importance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信