Richard B. Byrd Lt. Colonel, USAF, MC, F.C.C.P. , Douglas R. Gracey (Captain, USAF, MC) , Daniel C. Campbell Jr. Colonel, USAF, MC, F.C.C.P. , Aurelia A. Knies R.N.
{"title":"单疫苗结核菌素皮肤试验","authors":"Richard B. Byrd Lt. Colonel, USAF, MC, F.C.C.P. , Douglas R. Gracey (Captain, USAF, MC) , Daniel C. Campbell Jr. Colonel, USAF, MC, F.C.C.P. , Aurelia A. Knies R.N.","doi":"10.1378/chest.56.5.447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Mono-Vacc tuberculin test was evaluated in a group of 1,423 individuals, the standard for comparison being simultaneously administered Mantoux (PPD, 5 TU). In approximately one-half of these individuals, it was compared with the tine tuberculin test as well. The Mono-Vacc test was found to be acceptable for screening patients for tuberculin sensitivity. It was easily applied, highly acceptable to patients, and produced readily measurable induration. False negative reactions occurred in 1.2 percent which is within the intratest variability of the Mantoux test and thus unlikely to be statistically significant. The primary limiting factor was an 8.4 percent incidence of false positive reactions. However, the ease with which this test is applied would appear to more than compensate for the time spent in retesting with the Mantoux those who prove to be false positives. The tine tuberculin test was found to give similar results, but was more difficult to read and was less acceptable to patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11305,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the chest","volume":"56 5","pages":"Pages 447-449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1969-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1378/chest.56.5.447","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mono-Vacc Tuberculin Skin Test\",\"authors\":\"Richard B. Byrd Lt. Colonel, USAF, MC, F.C.C.P. , Douglas R. Gracey (Captain, USAF, MC) , Daniel C. Campbell Jr. Colonel, USAF, MC, F.C.C.P. , Aurelia A. Knies R.N.\",\"doi\":\"10.1378/chest.56.5.447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Mono-Vacc tuberculin test was evaluated in a group of 1,423 individuals, the standard for comparison being simultaneously administered Mantoux (PPD, 5 TU). In approximately one-half of these individuals, it was compared with the tine tuberculin test as well. The Mono-Vacc test was found to be acceptable for screening patients for tuberculin sensitivity. It was easily applied, highly acceptable to patients, and produced readily measurable induration. False negative reactions occurred in 1.2 percent which is within the intratest variability of the Mantoux test and thus unlikely to be statistically significant. The primary limiting factor was an 8.4 percent incidence of false positive reactions. However, the ease with which this test is applied would appear to more than compensate for the time spent in retesting with the Mantoux those who prove to be false positives. The tine tuberculin test was found to give similar results, but was more difficult to read and was less acceptable to patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the chest\",\"volume\":\"56 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 447-449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1969-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1378/chest.56.5.447\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096021715343600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the chest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096021715343600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Mono-Vacc tuberculin test was evaluated in a group of 1,423 individuals, the standard for comparison being simultaneously administered Mantoux (PPD, 5 TU). In approximately one-half of these individuals, it was compared with the tine tuberculin test as well. The Mono-Vacc test was found to be acceptable for screening patients for tuberculin sensitivity. It was easily applied, highly acceptable to patients, and produced readily measurable induration. False negative reactions occurred in 1.2 percent which is within the intratest variability of the Mantoux test and thus unlikely to be statistically significant. The primary limiting factor was an 8.4 percent incidence of false positive reactions. However, the ease with which this test is applied would appear to more than compensate for the time spent in retesting with the Mantoux those who prove to be false positives. The tine tuberculin test was found to give similar results, but was more difficult to read and was less acceptable to patients.