Khulood Abu Maria, Sara Abu Tarboosh, Adi El-Dalahmeh, Ola Tarawneh
{"title":"结合实验和计算数据的基于机器学习的生物打印质量预测。","authors":"Khulood Abu Maria, Sara Abu Tarboosh, Adi El-Dalahmeh, Ola Tarawneh","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering13101148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of hydrogel inks is an enabling technology for tissue engineering and the fabrication of personalized drug-delivery systems. However, in most laboratories the extrusion parameters are still optimized by slow, resource-intensive trial-and-error, because printability depends on the combined and often nonlinear influence of ink composition, extrusion pressure, and nozzle geometry rather than on any single variable. Alginate-methylcellulose (Alg-MC) is a widely used pharmaceutical bioink whose shear-thinning behavior makes this optimization particularly demanding. Here we developed a physics-informed machine-learning framework that predicts extrusion print quality before printing. A hybrid dataset of 3280 labeled samples was assembled by combining laboratory extrusion experiments, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of nozzle flow, and controlled augmentation with a deep belief network (DBN). Five physics-informed features encoding pressure-to-diameter and shear-rate interactions were engineered to embed rheological domain knowledge. Five base classifiers alongside two ensemble strategies, seven models in all, were benchmarked under five-fold stratified cross-validation. The voting ensemble performed best (accuracy, 93.3%; F1 = 0.929), narrowly ahead of the stacking ensemble (93.3% accuracy; F1 = 0.928). Alg:MC ratio, extrusion pressure, and the pressure-diameter interaction term stood out as the dominant predictors, consistent with established alginate rheology. On external validation-withholding one composition ratio and one needle gauge entirely from training and testing on those genuinely unseen conditions-accuracy was 75.9%, a stricter test than a random held-out split. Overall, the framework offers a practical, interpretable way to cut down experimental burden in pharmaceutical bioink development.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Bioprinting Quality Using Integrated Experimental and Computational Data.\",\"authors\":\"Khulood Abu Maria, Sara Abu Tarboosh, Adi El-Dalahmeh, Ola Tarawneh\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering13101148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of hydrogel inks is an enabling technology for tissue engineering and the fabrication of personalized drug-delivery systems. However, in most laboratories the extrusion parameters are still optimized by slow, resource-intensive trial-and-error, because printability depends on the combined and often nonlinear influence of ink composition, extrusion pressure, and nozzle geometry rather than on any single variable. Alginate-methylcellulose (Alg-MC) is a widely used pharmaceutical bioink whose shear-thinning behavior makes this optimization particularly demanding. Here we developed a physics-informed machine-learning framework that predicts extrusion print quality before printing. A hybrid dataset of 3280 labeled samples was assembled by combining laboratory extrusion experiments, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of nozzle flow, and controlled augmentation with a deep belief network (DBN). Five physics-informed features encoding pressure-to-diameter and shear-rate interactions were engineered to embed rheological domain knowledge. Five base classifiers alongside two ensemble strategies, seven models in all, were benchmarked under five-fold stratified cross-validation. The voting ensemble performed best (accuracy, 93.3%; F1 = 0.929), narrowly ahead of the stacking ensemble (93.3% accuracy; F1 = 0.928). Alg:MC ratio, extrusion pressure, and the pressure-diameter interaction term stood out as the dominant predictors, consistent with established alginate rheology. On external validation-withholding one composition ratio and one needle gauge entirely from training and testing on those genuinely unseen conditions-accuracy was 75.9%, a stricter test than a random held-out split. Overall, the framework offers a practical, interpretable way to cut down experimental burden in pharmaceutical bioink development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13101148\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13101148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Bioprinting Quality Using Integrated Experimental and Computational Data.
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of hydrogel inks is an enabling technology for tissue engineering and the fabrication of personalized drug-delivery systems. However, in most laboratories the extrusion parameters are still optimized by slow, resource-intensive trial-and-error, because printability depends on the combined and often nonlinear influence of ink composition, extrusion pressure, and nozzle geometry rather than on any single variable. Alginate-methylcellulose (Alg-MC) is a widely used pharmaceutical bioink whose shear-thinning behavior makes this optimization particularly demanding. Here we developed a physics-informed machine-learning framework that predicts extrusion print quality before printing. A hybrid dataset of 3280 labeled samples was assembled by combining laboratory extrusion experiments, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of nozzle flow, and controlled augmentation with a deep belief network (DBN). Five physics-informed features encoding pressure-to-diameter and shear-rate interactions were engineered to embed rheological domain knowledge. Five base classifiers alongside two ensemble strategies, seven models in all, were benchmarked under five-fold stratified cross-validation. The voting ensemble performed best (accuracy, 93.3%; F1 = 0.929), narrowly ahead of the stacking ensemble (93.3% accuracy; F1 = 0.928). Alg:MC ratio, extrusion pressure, and the pressure-diameter interaction term stood out as the dominant predictors, consistent with established alginate rheology. On external validation-withholding one composition ratio and one needle gauge entirely from training and testing on those genuinely unseen conditions-accuracy was 75.9%, a stricter test than a random held-out split. Overall, the framework offers a practical, interpretable way to cut down experimental burden in pharmaceutical bioink development.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering