结合实验和计算数据的基于机器学习的生物打印质量预测。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Khulood Abu Maria, Sara Abu Tarboosh, Adi El-Dalahmeh, Ola Tarawneh
{"title":"结合实验和计算数据的基于机器学习的生物打印质量预测。","authors":"Khulood Abu Maria, Sara Abu Tarboosh, Adi El-Dalahmeh, Ola Tarawneh","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering13101148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of hydrogel inks is an enabling technology for tissue engineering and the fabrication of personalized drug-delivery systems. However, in most laboratories the extrusion parameters are still optimized by slow, resource-intensive trial-and-error, because printability depends on the combined and often nonlinear influence of ink composition, extrusion pressure, and nozzle geometry rather than on any single variable. Alginate-methylcellulose (Alg-MC) is a widely used pharmaceutical bioink whose shear-thinning behavior makes this optimization particularly demanding. Here we developed a physics-informed machine-learning framework that predicts extrusion print quality before printing. A hybrid dataset of 3280 labeled samples was assembled by combining laboratory extrusion experiments, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of nozzle flow, and controlled augmentation with a deep belief network (DBN). Five physics-informed features encoding pressure-to-diameter and shear-rate interactions were engineered to embed rheological domain knowledge. Five base classifiers alongside two ensemble strategies, seven models in all, were benchmarked under five-fold stratified cross-validation. The voting ensemble performed best (accuracy, 93.3%; F1 = 0.929), narrowly ahead of the stacking ensemble (93.3% accuracy; F1 = 0.928). Alg:MC ratio, extrusion pressure, and the pressure-diameter interaction term stood out as the dominant predictors, consistent with established alginate rheology. On external validation-withholding one composition ratio and one needle gauge entirely from training and testing on those genuinely unseen conditions-accuracy was 75.9%, a stricter test than a random held-out split. Overall, the framework offers a practical, interpretable way to cut down experimental burden in pharmaceutical bioink development.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Bioprinting Quality Using Integrated Experimental and Computational Data.\",\"authors\":\"Khulood Abu Maria, Sara Abu Tarboosh, Adi El-Dalahmeh, Ola Tarawneh\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering13101148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of hydrogel inks is an enabling technology for tissue engineering and the fabrication of personalized drug-delivery systems. However, in most laboratories the extrusion parameters are still optimized by slow, resource-intensive trial-and-error, because printability depends on the combined and often nonlinear influence of ink composition, extrusion pressure, and nozzle geometry rather than on any single variable. Alginate-methylcellulose (Alg-MC) is a widely used pharmaceutical bioink whose shear-thinning behavior makes this optimization particularly demanding. Here we developed a physics-informed machine-learning framework that predicts extrusion print quality before printing. A hybrid dataset of 3280 labeled samples was assembled by combining laboratory extrusion experiments, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of nozzle flow, and controlled augmentation with a deep belief network (DBN). Five physics-informed features encoding pressure-to-diameter and shear-rate interactions were engineered to embed rheological domain knowledge. Five base classifiers alongside two ensemble strategies, seven models in all, were benchmarked under five-fold stratified cross-validation. The voting ensemble performed best (accuracy, 93.3%; F1 = 0.929), narrowly ahead of the stacking ensemble (93.3% accuracy; F1 = 0.928). Alg:MC ratio, extrusion pressure, and the pressure-diameter interaction term stood out as the dominant predictors, consistent with established alginate rheology. On external validation-withholding one composition ratio and one needle gauge entirely from training and testing on those genuinely unseen conditions-accuracy was 75.9%, a stricter test than a random held-out split. Overall, the framework offers a practical, interpretable way to cut down experimental burden in pharmaceutical bioink development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13101148\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13101148","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水凝胶墨水的三维生物打印是组织工程和个性化药物输送系统制造的一种使能技术。然而,在大多数实验室中,挤出参数仍然是通过缓慢的、资源密集的试错来优化的,因为印刷性能取决于油墨成分、挤出压力和喷嘴几何形状的综合和通常是非线性的影响,而不是任何单一的变量。藻酸盐-甲基纤维素(algate -methylcellulose,简称Alg-MC)是一种广泛使用的制药生物连接材料,其剪切变薄的特性使得这种优化方法的要求特别高。在这里,我们开发了一个物理知识的机器学习框架,可以在打印前预测挤出打印质量。通过室内挤压实验、喷嘴流动计算流体力学(CFD)模拟和深度信念网络(DBN)控制增强相结合,构建了包含3280个标记样品的混合数据集。五个物理信息特征编码压力-直径和剪切速率相互作用,以嵌入流变学领域知识。五个基本分类器和两个集成策略,总共七个模型,在五倍分层交叉验证下进行基准测试。投票集合表现最好(准确率93.3%,F1 = 0.929),略微领先于堆叠集合(准确率93.3%,F1 = 0.928)。海藻酸盐:MC比、挤压压力和压力-直径相互作用项是主要的预测因素,与已建立的海藻酸盐流变学一致。在外部验证中——完全从那些真正看不见的条件下的训练和测试中保留一个成分比和一个针规——准确率为75.9%,这是一个比随机分割更严格的测试。总体而言,该框架提供了一种实用的、可解释的方法,以减少制药生物链接开发的实验负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Bioprinting Quality Using Integrated Experimental and Computational Data.

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting of hydrogel inks is an enabling technology for tissue engineering and the fabrication of personalized drug-delivery systems. However, in most laboratories the extrusion parameters are still optimized by slow, resource-intensive trial-and-error, because printability depends on the combined and often nonlinear influence of ink composition, extrusion pressure, and nozzle geometry rather than on any single variable. Alginate-methylcellulose (Alg-MC) is a widely used pharmaceutical bioink whose shear-thinning behavior makes this optimization particularly demanding. Here we developed a physics-informed machine-learning framework that predicts extrusion print quality before printing. A hybrid dataset of 3280 labeled samples was assembled by combining laboratory extrusion experiments, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of nozzle flow, and controlled augmentation with a deep belief network (DBN). Five physics-informed features encoding pressure-to-diameter and shear-rate interactions were engineered to embed rheological domain knowledge. Five base classifiers alongside two ensemble strategies, seven models in all, were benchmarked under five-fold stratified cross-validation. The voting ensemble performed best (accuracy, 93.3%; F1 = 0.929), narrowly ahead of the stacking ensemble (93.3% accuracy; F1 = 0.928). Alg:MC ratio, extrusion pressure, and the pressure-diameter interaction term stood out as the dominant predictors, consistent with established alginate rheology. On external validation-withholding one composition ratio and one needle gauge entirely from training and testing on those genuinely unseen conditions-accuracy was 75.9%, a stricter test than a random held-out split. Overall, the framework offers a practical, interpretable way to cut down experimental burden in pharmaceutical bioink development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioengineering
Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
661
期刊介绍: Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书