hads评估的焦虑/抑郁状态和视力威胁糖尿病视网膜病变的眼部结局:一项多中心回顾性队列研究

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Bo Li, Yujin Jiang, Chenxin Li, Yikeng Huang, Shuzhi Zhao, Chuandi Zhou, Zhi Zheng, Xiaofeng Zhang
{"title":"hads评估的焦虑/抑郁状态和视力威胁糖尿病视网膜病变的眼部结局:一项多中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Bo Li,&nbsp;Yujin Jiang,&nbsp;Chenxin Li,&nbsp;Yikeng Huang,&nbsp;Shuzhi Zhao,&nbsp;Chuandi Zhou,&nbsp;Zhi Zheng,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Zhang","doi":"10.1155/da/6998782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) poses significant blindness risks and the study aimed to identify the impact of psychological factors on its ocular outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study enrolled 782 VTDR patients from three ophthalmological centers (2018–2021). DR severity was graded using ETDRS criteria. Primary outcomes included tractional retinal detachment (TRD) involving the fovea, neovascular glaucoma (NVG), final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) &lt;0.3, and recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Anxiety and depression were assessed via the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression evaluated the associations between HADS scores and ocular outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After a median follow-up of 24.8 months, depressive symptoms (HADS-D ≥8) were associated with higher rates of BCVA &lt;0.3 (67.8% vs. 57.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and NVG (13.6% vs. 6.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.020). Recurrent VH was more frequent in patients with anxiety (21.0% vs. 10.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.031) or depression (20.3% vs. 10.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.045). Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that each 1-point increase in HADS-D score significantly increased adjusted odds of TRD (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01−1.11), BCVA &lt;0.3 (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02−1.11), recurrent VH (aOR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02−1.17), and NVG (aOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03−1.17; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was a consistent positive gradient between HADS severity and adverse outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Depressive symptoms are independently associated with worse ocular prognoses in VTDR patients. Systematic psychological screening and intervention is essential to mitigate vision deterioration risk in this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/6998782","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HADS-Assessed Anxiety/Depression Status and Ocular Outcomes in Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Bo Li,&nbsp;Yujin Jiang,&nbsp;Chenxin Li,&nbsp;Yikeng Huang,&nbsp;Shuzhi Zhao,&nbsp;Chuandi Zhou,&nbsp;Zhi Zheng,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/da/6998782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) poses significant blindness risks and the study aimed to identify the impact of psychological factors on its ocular outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective cohort study enrolled 782 VTDR patients from three ophthalmological centers (2018–2021). DR severity was graded using ETDRS criteria. Primary outcomes included tractional retinal detachment (TRD) involving the fovea, neovascular glaucoma (NVG), final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) &lt;0.3, and recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Anxiety and depression were assessed via the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression evaluated the associations between HADS scores and ocular outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>After a median follow-up of 24.8 months, depressive symptoms (HADS-D ≥8) were associated with higher rates of BCVA &lt;0.3 (67.8% vs. 57.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and NVG (13.6% vs. 6.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.020). Recurrent VH was more frequent in patients with anxiety (21.0% vs. 10.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.031) or depression (20.3% vs. 10.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.045). Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that each 1-point increase in HADS-D score significantly increased adjusted odds of TRD (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01−1.11), BCVA &lt;0.3 (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02−1.11), recurrent VH (aOR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02−1.17), and NVG (aOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03−1.17; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was a consistent positive gradient between HADS severity and adverse outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Depressive symptoms are independently associated with worse ocular prognoses in VTDR patients. Systematic psychological screening and intervention is essential to mitigate vision deterioration risk in this population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"volume\":\"2026 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/6998782\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Depression and Anxiety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/6998782\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/6998782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨威胁视力的糖尿病性视网膜病变(VTDR)的致盲风险,探讨心理因素对其视力结局的影响。方法回顾性队列研究纳入2018-2021年3个眼科中心的782例VTDR患者。采用ETDRS标准对DR严重程度进行分级。主要结果包括累及中央窝的牵引性视网膜脱离(TRD)、新生血管性青光眼(NVG)、最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA) 0.3和复发性玻璃体出血(VH)。通过医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估焦虑和抑郁。单变量和多变量logistic回归评估HADS评分与眼部预后之间的关系。结果中位随访24.8个月后,抑郁症状(HADS-D≥8)与BCVA <;0.3 (67.8% vs. 57.2%, p = 0.033)和NVG (13.6% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.020)发生率升高相关。焦虑(21.0%比10.6%,p = 0.031)或抑郁(20.3%比10.7%,p = 0.045)患者复发性VH更为频繁。多变量logistic分析显示,HADS-D评分每增加1分,TRD (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01 ~ 1.11)、BCVA <0.3 (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02 ~ 1.11)、复发性VH (aOR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02 ~ 1.17)和NVG (aOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03 ~ 1.17;均p <; 0.05)的调整几率均显著增加。HADS严重程度与不良结局之间存在一致的正梯度。结论VTDR患者的抑郁症状与眼部预后有独立相关性。系统的心理筛查和干预对于减轻这一人群视力恶化的风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HADS-Assessed Anxiety/Depression Status and Ocular Outcomes in Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) poses significant blindness risks and the study aimed to identify the impact of psychological factors on its ocular outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 782 VTDR patients from three ophthalmological centers (2018–2021). DR severity was graded using ETDRS criteria. Primary outcomes included tractional retinal detachment (TRD) involving the fovea, neovascular glaucoma (NVG), final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) <0.3, and recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (VH). Anxiety and depression were assessed via the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression evaluated the associations between HADS scores and ocular outcomes.

Results

After a median follow-up of 24.8 months, depressive symptoms (HADS-D ≥8) were associated with higher rates of BCVA <0.3 (67.8% vs. 57.2%, p = 0.033) and NVG (13.6% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.020). Recurrent VH was more frequent in patients with anxiety (21.0% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.031) or depression (20.3% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.045). Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that each 1-point increase in HADS-D score significantly increased adjusted odds of TRD (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01−1.11), BCVA <0.3 (aOR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02−1.11), recurrent VH (aOR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02−1.17), and NVG (aOR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.03−1.17; all p < 0.05). There was a consistent positive gradient between HADS severity and adverse outcomes.

Conclusion

Depressive symptoms are independently associated with worse ocular prognoses in VTDR patients. Systematic psychological screening and intervention is essential to mitigate vision deterioration risk in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书