Oscar Kjell, Adithya V Ganesan, Ryan L Boyd, Joshua Oltmanns, Alfredo Rivero, Scott Feltman, Melissa A Carr, Jorge Alves, Benjamin Luft, Roman Kotov, H Andrew Schwartz
{"title":"基于患者语言的创伤后应激障碍新人工智能评估的可复制性和有效性:模型预登记的顺序评估。","authors":"Oscar Kjell, Adithya V Ganesan, Ryan L Boyd, Joshua Oltmanns, Alfredo Rivero, Scott Feltman, Melissa A Carr, Jorge Alves, Benjamin Luft, Roman Kotov, H Andrew Schwartz","doi":"10.1177/21677026261439026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in identifying psychopathology through language, but replicability in AI models remains challenging. We develop an AI-based language assessment of posttraumatic-stress-disorder (PTSD) severity and introduce the sequential evaluation with model preregistration to rigorously evaluate its validity and replicability. This design includes two phases: development with preregistration and evaluation. Data included development (<i>N</i> = 1,437) and prospective (<i>N</i> = 346) samples, in which participants described their lives during automated interviews. In the prospective sample, preregistered models correlated with PTSD CheckList scores (<i>r</i> = .38, <i>p</i> < .001) and converged with PTSD diagnosis (area under the curve [AUC] = .76; outperforming demographics and trauma exposures: AUC = .61, <i>p</i> < .01). We found that for each standard-deviation increase, mental-health-care expenditure rose by $696.50 (<i>p</i> < .001). Our preregistered PTSD model assessments are replicable in prospectively collected clinical data and showed external validity against expense criteria. With further development, such models can be used to screen for PTSD or monitor treatment response, especially in telehealth or automated interviews, in which deployment can be seamless.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Replicability and Validity of a New Artificial-Intelligence Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder From Patient Language: A Sequential Evaluation With Model Preregistration.\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Kjell, Adithya V Ganesan, Ryan L Boyd, Joshua Oltmanns, Alfredo Rivero, Scott Feltman, Melissa A Carr, Jorge Alves, Benjamin Luft, Roman Kotov, H Andrew Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21677026261439026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in identifying psychopathology through language, but replicability in AI models remains challenging. We develop an AI-based language assessment of posttraumatic-stress-disorder (PTSD) severity and introduce the sequential evaluation with model preregistration to rigorously evaluate its validity and replicability. This design includes two phases: development with preregistration and evaluation. Data included development (<i>N</i> = 1,437) and prospective (<i>N</i> = 346) samples, in which participants described their lives during automated interviews. In the prospective sample, preregistered models correlated with PTSD CheckList scores (<i>r</i> = .38, <i>p</i> < .001) and converged with PTSD diagnosis (area under the curve [AUC] = .76; outperforming demographics and trauma exposures: AUC = .61, <i>p</i> < .01). We found that for each standard-deviation increase, mental-health-care expenditure rose by $696.50 (<i>p</i> < .001). Our preregistered PTSD model assessments are replicable in prospectively collected clinical data and showed external validity against expense criteria. With further development, such models can be used to screen for PTSD or monitor treatment response, especially in telehealth or automated interviews, in which deployment can be seamless.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682779/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026261439026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026261439026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人工智能(AI)有望通过语言识别精神病理,但人工智能模型的可复制性仍然具有挑战性。我们开发了一种基于人工智能的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)严重程度的语言评估方法,并引入了模型预注册的顺序评估方法来严格评估其有效性和可重复性。该设计包括两个阶段:预注册开发和评估。数据包括发展样本(N = 1437)和前瞻性样本(N = 346),其中参与者在自动访谈中描述了他们的生活。在前瞻性样本中,预注册模型与PTSD CheckList得分相关(r = .38, p < .001),并与PTSD诊断相融合(曲线下面积[AUC] = .76;优于人口统计学和创伤暴露:AUC = .61, p < .01)。我们发现,每增加一个标准差,精神卫生保健支出就增加696.50美元(p < 0.001)。我们预先注册的创伤后应激障碍模型评估在前瞻性收集的临床数据中是可复制的,并显示出针对费用标准的外部有效性。随着进一步发展,这些模型可用于筛选创伤后应激障碍或监测治疗反应,特别是在远程医疗或自动访谈中,部署可以无缝衔接。
Replicability and Validity of a New Artificial-Intelligence Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder From Patient Language: A Sequential Evaluation With Model Preregistration.
Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise in identifying psychopathology through language, but replicability in AI models remains challenging. We develop an AI-based language assessment of posttraumatic-stress-disorder (PTSD) severity and introduce the sequential evaluation with model preregistration to rigorously evaluate its validity and replicability. This design includes two phases: development with preregistration and evaluation. Data included development (N = 1,437) and prospective (N = 346) samples, in which participants described their lives during automated interviews. In the prospective sample, preregistered models correlated with PTSD CheckList scores (r = .38, p < .001) and converged with PTSD diagnosis (area under the curve [AUC] = .76; outperforming demographics and trauma exposures: AUC = .61, p < .01). We found that for each standard-deviation increase, mental-health-care expenditure rose by $696.50 (p < .001). Our preregistered PTSD model assessments are replicable in prospectively collected clinical data and showed external validity against expense criteria. With further development, such models can be used to screen for PTSD or monitor treatment response, especially in telehealth or automated interviews, in which deployment can be seamless.
期刊介绍:
The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.