{"title":"Pterostilbene-(E)-1,2-bis(pyridinin -4-yl)乙烯共晶的液相-液相分离控制多态性和化学同构性","authors":"Mythili Aruchamy, Srivaishnavi Devi Beetukooru, Sunil Kumar Nechipadappu, Sridhar Balasubramanian","doi":"10.1021/acs.cgd.6c00366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Liquid−liquid phase separation (LLPS) can severely hinder controlled nucleation and crystal growth during cocrystallization, restricting access to phase-pure polymorphs and stoichiomorphs. During the cocrystallization of the Pterostilbene-(E)-1,2-bis(pyridin-4-yl)ethene (PTB-BPE) system, LLPS emerged as a major experimental barrier to crystal development. In situ microscopic observations revealed that strong PTB-solvent interactions under specific solvent environments promoted LLPS, thereby suppressing nucleation and crystal growth. This limitation was overcome through mechanochemical crystallization approaches combined with the ability of BPE to form stabilizing O−H···N hydrogen bond interactions with PTB. Systematic solvent modulation afforded four crystalline phases of PTB-BPE: Form I (plate, PTB/BPE = 1:0.5), Form II (needle, PTB/BPE = 1:0.5), and Form III (block, PTB/BPE = 2:1) as polymorphic forms, while Form IV (rod, PTB/BPE = 1:1.5) represents a distinct stoichiomorph. Mechanical pretreatment followed by slow evaporation enabled the formation of multiple solid forms; other mechanochemical routes predominantly yielded Form III, and slurry conversion selectively produced bulk Form IV. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction confirmed differences in packing, symmetry, and asymmetric unit composition among the forms. Lattice energy calculations and void analysis indicate comparable thermodynamic stability among the polymorphs, with Form III exhibiting strong intermolecular interactions and efficient packing within the PTB-BPE solid-form landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":34,"journal":{"name":"Crystal Growth & Design","volume":"26 20","pages":"8068–8085"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquid−Liquid Phase Separation-Controlled Polymorphism and Stoichiomorphism in the Pterostilbene-(E)-1,2-bis(pyridin-4-yl)ethene Cocrystal\",\"authors\":\"Mythili Aruchamy, Srivaishnavi Devi Beetukooru, Sunil Kumar Nechipadappu, Sridhar Balasubramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.cgd.6c00366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Liquid−liquid phase separation (LLPS) can severely hinder controlled nucleation and crystal growth during cocrystallization, restricting access to phase-pure polymorphs and stoichiomorphs. During the cocrystallization of the Pterostilbene-(E)-1,2-bis(pyridin-4-yl)ethene (PTB-BPE) system, LLPS emerged as a major experimental barrier to crystal development. In situ microscopic observations revealed that strong PTB-solvent interactions under specific solvent environments promoted LLPS, thereby suppressing nucleation and crystal growth. This limitation was overcome through mechanochemical crystallization approaches combined with the ability of BPE to form stabilizing O−H···N hydrogen bond interactions with PTB. Systematic solvent modulation afforded four crystalline phases of PTB-BPE: Form I (plate, PTB/BPE = 1:0.5), Form II (needle, PTB/BPE = 1:0.5), and Form III (block, PTB/BPE = 2:1) as polymorphic forms, while Form IV (rod, PTB/BPE = 1:1.5) represents a distinct stoichiomorph. Mechanical pretreatment followed by slow evaporation enabled the formation of multiple solid forms; other mechanochemical routes predominantly yielded Form III, and slurry conversion selectively produced bulk Form IV. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction confirmed differences in packing, symmetry, and asymmetric unit composition among the forms. Lattice energy calculations and void analysis indicate comparable thermodynamic stability among the polymorphs, with Form III exhibiting strong intermolecular interactions and efficient packing within the PTB-BPE solid-form landscape.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crystal Growth & Design\",\"volume\":\"26 20\",\"pages\":\"8068–8085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crystal Growth & Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.6c00366\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/9/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crystal Growth & Design","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.cgd.6c00366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Liquid−Liquid Phase Separation-Controlled Polymorphism and Stoichiomorphism in the Pterostilbene-(E)-1,2-bis(pyridin-4-yl)ethene Cocrystal
Liquid−liquid phase separation (LLPS) can severely hinder controlled nucleation and crystal growth during cocrystallization, restricting access to phase-pure polymorphs and stoichiomorphs. During the cocrystallization of the Pterostilbene-(E)-1,2-bis(pyridin-4-yl)ethene (PTB-BPE) system, LLPS emerged as a major experimental barrier to crystal development. In situ microscopic observations revealed that strong PTB-solvent interactions under specific solvent environments promoted LLPS, thereby suppressing nucleation and crystal growth. This limitation was overcome through mechanochemical crystallization approaches combined with the ability of BPE to form stabilizing O−H···N hydrogen bond interactions with PTB. Systematic solvent modulation afforded four crystalline phases of PTB-BPE: Form I (plate, PTB/BPE = 1:0.5), Form II (needle, PTB/BPE = 1:0.5), and Form III (block, PTB/BPE = 2:1) as polymorphic forms, while Form IV (rod, PTB/BPE = 1:1.5) represents a distinct stoichiomorph. Mechanical pretreatment followed by slow evaporation enabled the formation of multiple solid forms; other mechanochemical routes predominantly yielded Form III, and slurry conversion selectively produced bulk Form IV. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction confirmed differences in packing, symmetry, and asymmetric unit composition among the forms. Lattice energy calculations and void analysis indicate comparable thermodynamic stability among the polymorphs, with Form III exhibiting strong intermolecular interactions and efficient packing within the PTB-BPE solid-form landscape.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Crystal Growth & Design is to stimulate crossfertilization of knowledge among scientists and engineers working in the fields of crystal growth, crystal engineering, and the industrial application of crystalline materials.
Crystal Growth & Design publishes theoretical and experimental studies of the physical, chemical, and biological phenomena and processes related to the design, growth, and application of crystalline materials. Synergistic approaches originating from different disciplines and technologies and integrating the fields of crystal growth, crystal engineering, intermolecular interactions, and industrial application are encouraged.