{"title":"社会剥夺条件下的情绪反应与决策:隔离期间特质焦虑的作用","authors":"Avisha, Akhilesh Tayade, Arjun Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.1098/rsos.251773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social isolation measures enforced during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of the social environment in shaping affective states and decision-making. However, the day-to-day experience and psychological recovery from social deprivation, especially among individuals with high trait anxiety, remains poorly understood. We conducted a 10-day longitudinal study with 116 university students returning to campus, collecting approximately 31 000 momentary assessments of affect and social interactions during a 3-day quarantine and subsequent period. Quarantine increased the need for social interaction and altered patterns of social engagement, whereas trait anxiety was robustly associated with reduced positive affect and elevated negative affect. Close interactions following quarantine were associated with higher positive affect. We also administered a virtual patch-foraging task to participants during and after quarantine. Greater variability in negative affect was associated with lower patch exit thresholds, suggesting a tendency to persist in depleted patches. These findings highlight how trait anxiety shapes emotional experience and social behaviour in daily life and reveal how fluctuations in negative affect can influence sequential decision-making under uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"13 10","pages":"251773"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13673250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotional reactivity and decision-making under social deprivation: the role of trait anxiety during quarantine.\",\"authors\":\"Avisha, Akhilesh Tayade, Arjun Ramakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsos.251773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social isolation measures enforced during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of the social environment in shaping affective states and decision-making. However, the day-to-day experience and psychological recovery from social deprivation, especially among individuals with high trait anxiety, remains poorly understood. We conducted a 10-day longitudinal study with 116 university students returning to campus, collecting approximately 31 000 momentary assessments of affect and social interactions during a 3-day quarantine and subsequent period. Quarantine increased the need for social interaction and altered patterns of social engagement, whereas trait anxiety was robustly associated with reduced positive affect and elevated negative affect. Close interactions following quarantine were associated with higher positive affect. We also administered a virtual patch-foraging task to participants during and after quarantine. Greater variability in negative affect was associated with lower patch exit thresholds, suggesting a tendency to persist in depleted patches. These findings highlight how trait anxiety shapes emotional experience and social behaviour in daily life and reveal how fluctuations in negative affect can influence sequential decision-making under uncertainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Royal Society Open Science\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"251773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13673250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Royal Society Open Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251773\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/10/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251773","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Emotional reactivity and decision-making under social deprivation: the role of trait anxiety during quarantine.
Social isolation measures enforced during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of the social environment in shaping affective states and decision-making. However, the day-to-day experience and psychological recovery from social deprivation, especially among individuals with high trait anxiety, remains poorly understood. We conducted a 10-day longitudinal study with 116 university students returning to campus, collecting approximately 31 000 momentary assessments of affect and social interactions during a 3-day quarantine and subsequent period. Quarantine increased the need for social interaction and altered patterns of social engagement, whereas trait anxiety was robustly associated with reduced positive affect and elevated negative affect. Close interactions following quarantine were associated with higher positive affect. We also administered a virtual patch-foraging task to participants during and after quarantine. Greater variability in negative affect was associated with lower patch exit thresholds, suggesting a tendency to persist in depleted patches. These findings highlight how trait anxiety shapes emotional experience and social behaviour in daily life and reveal how fluctuations in negative affect can influence sequential decision-making under uncertainty.
期刊介绍:
Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review.
The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.