{"title":"改良Broström骨膜瓣增强术治疗复发性慢性踝关节不稳的疗效。","authors":"Jong Jin Moon, Myeong Jun Song, Jun Young Lee","doi":"10.4055/cios26081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the modified Broström procedure (MBP) is widely accepted as the standard surgical treatment for chronic ankle instability (CAI), recurrent instability remains a clinical challenge, particularly in patients with poor tissue quality or high functional demands. To overcome these limitations, periosteal flap augmentation has been proposed as a biological alternative for patients with recurrent CAI after failed MBP. This study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision MBP with periosteal flap augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen patients (mean age, 29.5 years; range, 18-45 years) who underwent revision MBP combined with periosteal flap augmentation between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow-up duration was 23.7 months (18-32 months). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Karlsson-Peterson score. Radiographic evaluation included talar tilt angle and anterior talar displacement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 23.7 months (18-32 months), all clinical scores improved significantly (VAS: 5.9 to 1.6; AOFAS: 64.1 to 90.6; Karlsson-Peterson: 50.7 to 90.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Radiographic stability also improved significantly (talar tilt: 10.7° to 4.9°; anterior displacement: 8.9 mm to 4.1 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). No recurrent instability was observed. Three patients had minor wound complications, all of which resolved with conservative treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revision MBP with periosteal flap augmentation showed favorable short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with recurrent CAI after failed MBP. This technique may serve as a useful autologous reinforcement option in selected revision cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"18 5","pages":"944-949"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Revision Modified Broström Procedure with Periosteal Flap Augmentation in Patients with Recurrent Chronic Ankle Instability.\",\"authors\":\"Jong Jin Moon, Myeong Jun Song, Jun Young Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4055/cios26081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although the modified Broström procedure (MBP) is widely accepted as the standard surgical treatment for chronic ankle instability (CAI), recurrent instability remains a clinical challenge, particularly in patients with poor tissue quality or high functional demands. To overcome these limitations, periosteal flap augmentation has been proposed as a biological alternative for patients with recurrent CAI after failed MBP. This study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision MBP with periosteal flap augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen patients (mean age, 29.5 years; range, 18-45 years) who underwent revision MBP combined with periosteal flap augmentation between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow-up duration was 23.7 months (18-32 months). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Karlsson-Peterson score. Radiographic evaluation included talar tilt angle and anterior talar displacement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a mean follow-up of 23.7 months (18-32 months), all clinical scores improved significantly (VAS: 5.9 to 1.6; AOFAS: 64.1 to 90.6; Karlsson-Peterson: 50.7 to 90.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Radiographic stability also improved significantly (talar tilt: 10.7° to 4.9°; anterior displacement: 8.9 mm to 4.1 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). No recurrent instability was observed. Three patients had minor wound complications, all of which resolved with conservative treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Revision MBP with periosteal flap augmentation showed favorable short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with recurrent CAI after failed MBP. This technique may serve as a useful autologous reinforcement option in selected revision cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"944-949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662236/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios26081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios26081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of Revision Modified Broström Procedure with Periosteal Flap Augmentation in Patients with Recurrent Chronic Ankle Instability.
Background: Although the modified Broström procedure (MBP) is widely accepted as the standard surgical treatment for chronic ankle instability (CAI), recurrent instability remains a clinical challenge, particularly in patients with poor tissue quality or high functional demands. To overcome these limitations, periosteal flap augmentation has been proposed as a biological alternative for patients with recurrent CAI after failed MBP. This study evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision MBP with periosteal flap augmentation.
Methods: Fourteen patients (mean age, 29.5 years; range, 18-45 years) who underwent revision MBP combined with periosteal flap augmentation between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow-up duration was 23.7 months (18-32 months). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Karlsson-Peterson score. Radiographic evaluation included talar tilt angle and anterior talar displacement.
Results: At a mean follow-up of 23.7 months (18-32 months), all clinical scores improved significantly (VAS: 5.9 to 1.6; AOFAS: 64.1 to 90.6; Karlsson-Peterson: 50.7 to 90.0; p < 0.001). Radiographic stability also improved significantly (talar tilt: 10.7° to 4.9°; anterior displacement: 8.9 mm to 4.1 mm; p < 0.001). No recurrent instability was observed. Three patients had minor wound complications, all of which resolved with conservative treatment.
Conclusions: Revision MBP with periosteal flap augmentation showed favorable short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with recurrent CAI after failed MBP. This technique may serve as a useful autologous reinforcement option in selected revision cases.