限制性高渗盐水复苏与大鼠失血性休克后肠道损伤减少有关,并与MALAT1、miR-145-5p和BNIP3表达的协调变化有关。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Frontiers in Surgery Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2026.1920366
Hongfei Ma, Yang Zhang, Jie Yang, Tianshan Wu, Gongbing Zhu, Xinwen Yang
{"title":"限制性高渗盐水复苏与大鼠失血性休克后肠道损伤减少有关,并与MALAT1、miR-145-5p和BNIP3表达的协调变化有关。","authors":"Hongfei Ma, Yang Zhang, Jie Yang, Tianshan Wu, Gongbing Zhu, Xinwen Yang","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2026.1920366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion contributes to barrier failure and secondary organ injury after hemorrhagic shock. It is not known whether restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation alters the resulting intestinal injury or the accompanying non-coding RNA response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to normal control, hemorrhagic shock, conventional 0.9% saline resuscitation (CFR), restrictive 7.5% hypertonic saline resuscitation (RFR), or superior mesenteric artery ischemia-reperfusion control groups. Hemorrhagic shock was induced by controlled blood withdrawal to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 35-40 mmHg for 60 min. CFR targeted an MAP of approximately 80 mmHg, whereas RFR targeted an MAP of approximately 60 mmHg. Three-hour survival was recorded. Coagulation, serum IL-6 and TNF-α, qRT-PCR, Western blotting, H&E staining, and TUNEL were assessed in assay-specific subsets. Public GEO datasets were analyzed for exploratory transcriptomic context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hour survival was 75% in RFR and 60% in CFR (two-sided Fisher exact test, <i>P</i> = 0.501). In the coagulation cohort, prothrombin time (PT) and thrombin time (TT) were shorter in RFR than in CFR after Dunn-Holm adjustment; no differences were observed for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), and prothrombin activity (PA). RFR had lower serum IL-6 and TNF-α, better-preserved ileal morphology, and lower TUNEL positivity in representative fields than CFR. MALAT1 was lower, while miR-145-5p and Bnip3/BNIP3 were higher in RFR. Exploratory analyses of public datasets confirmed that Malat1 and Bnip3 are expressed in the intestinal cell populations relevant to ischemia-reperfusion injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under the present experimental conditions, restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation was associated with a less severe acute intestinal injury phenotype than conventional isotonic resuscitation. The coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 do not establish a linear regulatory axis and require functional validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"13 ","pages":"1920366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation is associated with less intestinal injury after hemorrhagic shock in rats and with coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 expression.\",\"authors\":\"Hongfei Ma, Yang Zhang, Jie Yang, Tianshan Wu, Gongbing Zhu, Xinwen Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsurg.2026.1920366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion contributes to barrier failure and secondary organ injury after hemorrhagic shock. It is not known whether restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation alters the resulting intestinal injury or the accompanying non-coding RNA response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to normal control, hemorrhagic shock, conventional 0.9% saline resuscitation (CFR), restrictive 7.5% hypertonic saline resuscitation (RFR), or superior mesenteric artery ischemia-reperfusion control groups. Hemorrhagic shock was induced by controlled blood withdrawal to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 35-40 mmHg for 60 min. CFR targeted an MAP of approximately 80 mmHg, whereas RFR targeted an MAP of approximately 60 mmHg. Three-hour survival was recorded. Coagulation, serum IL-6 and TNF-α, qRT-PCR, Western blotting, H&E staining, and TUNEL were assessed in assay-specific subsets. Public GEO datasets were analyzed for exploratory transcriptomic context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hour survival was 75% in RFR and 60% in CFR (two-sided Fisher exact test, <i>P</i> = 0.501). In the coagulation cohort, prothrombin time (PT) and thrombin time (TT) were shorter in RFR than in CFR after Dunn-Holm adjustment; no differences were observed for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), and prothrombin activity (PA). RFR had lower serum IL-6 and TNF-α, better-preserved ileal morphology, and lower TUNEL positivity in representative fields than CFR. MALAT1 was lower, while miR-145-5p and Bnip3/BNIP3 were higher in RFR. Exploratory analyses of public datasets confirmed that Malat1 and Bnip3 are expressed in the intestinal cell populations relevant to ischemia-reperfusion injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under the present experimental conditions, restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation was associated with a less severe acute intestinal injury phenotype than conventional isotonic resuscitation. The coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 do not establish a linear regulatory axis and require functional validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1920366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662056/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1920366\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1920366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肠缺血再灌注可导致失血性休克后屏障功能衰竭和继发性器官损伤。目前尚不清楚限制性高渗盐水复苏是否会改变由此产生的肠道损伤或伴随的非编码RNA反应。方法:雄性sd - dawley大鼠100只,随机分为正常对照组、失血性休克组、0.9%生理盐水常规复苏组、7.5%限制性高渗生理盐水复苏组和肠系膜上动脉缺血再灌注对照组。通过控制抽血使平均动脉压(MAP)维持在35-40 mmHg 60分钟,诱导失血性休克。CFR针对的MAP约为80 mmHg,而RFR针对的MAP约为60 mmHg。记录存活3小时。对血凝、血清IL-6和TNF-α、qRT-PCR、Western blotting、H&E染色和TUNEL进行检测特异性亚群评估。对公共GEO数据集进行探索性转录组学背景分析。结果:RFR组3小时生存率为75%,CFR组为60%(双侧Fisher精确检验,P = 0.501)。在凝血队列中,经Dunn-Holm调整后的RFR凝血酶原时间(PT)和凝血酶时间(TT)均短于CFR;在活化的部分凝血活素时间(APTT)、国际标准化比率(INR)和凝血酶原活性(PA)方面未观察到差异。与CFR相比,RFR血清IL-6和TNF-α较低,回肠形态保存较好,代表性领域TUNEL阳性较低。在RFR中,MALAT1较低,而miR-145-5p和Bnip3/ Bnip3较高。对公开数据集的探索性分析证实,Malat1和Bnip3在与缺血再灌注损伤相关的肠细胞群中表达。结论:在本实验条件下,限制性高渗盐水复苏与常规等渗复苏相比,急性肠损伤表型较轻。MALAT1、miR-145-5p和BNIP3的协同变化没有建立线性调控轴,需要功能验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation is associated with less intestinal injury after hemorrhagic shock in rats and with coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 expression.

Background: Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion contributes to barrier failure and secondary organ injury after hemorrhagic shock. It is not known whether restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation alters the resulting intestinal injury or the accompanying non-coding RNA response.

Methods: One hundred male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to normal control, hemorrhagic shock, conventional 0.9% saline resuscitation (CFR), restrictive 7.5% hypertonic saline resuscitation (RFR), or superior mesenteric artery ischemia-reperfusion control groups. Hemorrhagic shock was induced by controlled blood withdrawal to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 35-40 mmHg for 60 min. CFR targeted an MAP of approximately 80 mmHg, whereas RFR targeted an MAP of approximately 60 mmHg. Three-hour survival was recorded. Coagulation, serum IL-6 and TNF-α, qRT-PCR, Western blotting, H&E staining, and TUNEL were assessed in assay-specific subsets. Public GEO datasets were analyzed for exploratory transcriptomic context.

Results: Three-hour survival was 75% in RFR and 60% in CFR (two-sided Fisher exact test, P = 0.501). In the coagulation cohort, prothrombin time (PT) and thrombin time (TT) were shorter in RFR than in CFR after Dunn-Holm adjustment; no differences were observed for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), and prothrombin activity (PA). RFR had lower serum IL-6 and TNF-α, better-preserved ileal morphology, and lower TUNEL positivity in representative fields than CFR. MALAT1 was lower, while miR-145-5p and Bnip3/BNIP3 were higher in RFR. Exploratory analyses of public datasets confirmed that Malat1 and Bnip3 are expressed in the intestinal cell populations relevant to ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Conclusion: Under the present experimental conditions, restrictive hypertonic saline resuscitation was associated with a less severe acute intestinal injury phenotype than conventional isotonic resuscitation. The coordinated changes in MALAT1, miR-145-5p, and BNIP3 do not establish a linear regulatory axis and require functional validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Surgery
Frontiers in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles. Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书