青年作为弱势利益相关者AI-Mediated卫生环境:监管漏洞的生命伦理分析。

IF 2.1 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Molly M Serena Gomes, Acadia W Buro
{"title":"青年作为弱势利益相关者AI-Mediated卫生环境:监管漏洞的生命伦理分析。","authors":"Molly M Serena Gomes, Acadia W Buro","doi":"10.1007/s11673-026-10640-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into digital media and health information ecosystems-including large language model chatbots, AI-enabled mHealth applications, and algorithmically curated social media-is reshaping how adolescents encounter and interpret health-related content. While regulatory debates emphasize innovation and efficiency, insufficient attention has been paid to youth as stakeholders whose interests and perspectives are rarely represented in AI governance. This article offers a bioethical analysis of federal and state regulatory approaches to AI in the United States, arguing that frameworks insufficiently address adolescents' developmental interests and exposure to algorithmic risk. Adolescents navigate digital health ecosystems shaped by algorithmic curation and inconsistent credibility signals yet have little voice in governance decisions shaping these environments. Drawing on bioethical principles, including respect for developing autonomy, distributive justice, and nonmaleficence, this analysis demonstrates how disclosure-based models place interpretive burdens on users while carrying developmental stakes for adolescents, and how vulnerability emerges relationally from interactions among developmental, technological, and social factors rather than from deficits within young people. These limitations are compounded by gaps in transparency and accountability across AI-generated and commercially influenced health content. Addressing these challenges requires developmentally responsive, equity-oriented governance, including youth-specific AI impact assessments and mechanisms for youth participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Youth as Underrepresented Stakeholders in AI-Mediated Health Environments: A Bioethical Analysis of Regulatory Gaps.\",\"authors\":\"Molly M Serena Gomes, Acadia W Buro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11673-026-10640-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into digital media and health information ecosystems-including large language model chatbots, AI-enabled mHealth applications, and algorithmically curated social media-is reshaping how adolescents encounter and interpret health-related content. While regulatory debates emphasize innovation and efficiency, insufficient attention has been paid to youth as stakeholders whose interests and perspectives are rarely represented in AI governance. This article offers a bioethical analysis of federal and state regulatory approaches to AI in the United States, arguing that frameworks insufficiently address adolescents' developmental interests and exposure to algorithmic risk. Adolescents navigate digital health ecosystems shaped by algorithmic curation and inconsistent credibility signals yet have little voice in governance decisions shaping these environments. Drawing on bioethical principles, including respect for developing autonomy, distributive justice, and nonmaleficence, this analysis demonstrates how disclosure-based models place interpretive burdens on users while carrying developmental stakes for adolescents, and how vulnerability emerges relationally from interactions among developmental, technological, and social factors rather than from deficits within young people. These limitations are compounded by gaps in transparency and accountability across AI-generated and commercially influenced health content. Addressing these challenges requires developmentally responsive, equity-oriented governance, including youth-specific AI impact assessments and mechanisms for youth participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-026-10640-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-026-10640-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Youth as Underrepresented Stakeholders in AI-Mediated Health Environments: A Bioethical Analysis of Regulatory Gaps.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into digital media and health information ecosystems-including large language model chatbots, AI-enabled mHealth applications, and algorithmically curated social media-is reshaping how adolescents encounter and interpret health-related content. While regulatory debates emphasize innovation and efficiency, insufficient attention has been paid to youth as stakeholders whose interests and perspectives are rarely represented in AI governance. This article offers a bioethical analysis of federal and state regulatory approaches to AI in the United States, arguing that frameworks insufficiently address adolescents' developmental interests and exposure to algorithmic risk. Adolescents navigate digital health ecosystems shaped by algorithmic curation and inconsistent credibility signals yet have little voice in governance decisions shaping these environments. Drawing on bioethical principles, including respect for developing autonomy, distributive justice, and nonmaleficence, this analysis demonstrates how disclosure-based models place interpretive burdens on users while carrying developmental stakes for adolescents, and how vulnerability emerges relationally from interactions among developmental, technological, and social factors rather than from deficits within young people. These limitations are compounded by gaps in transparency and accountability across AI-generated and commercially influenced health content. Addressing these challenges requires developmentally responsive, equity-oriented governance, including youth-specific AI impact assessments and mechanisms for youth participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following: -philosophy- bioethics- economics- social theory- law- public health and epidemiology- anthropology- psychology- feminism- gay and lesbian studies- linguistics and discourse analysis- cultural studies- disability studies- history- literature and literary studies- environmental sciences- theology and religious studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书