Kameel Khabaz, Nicole J Newman-Hung, Ruiwen Ding, Derek Pham, Nicholas J Jackson, William Hsu, Nicholas M Bernthal, Lauren E Wessel
{"title":"基于机器学习的上肢软组织肉瘤复发和生存预测。","authors":"Kameel Khabaz, Nicole J Newman-Hung, Ruiwen Ding, Derek Pham, Nicholas J Jackson, William Hsu, Nicholas M Bernthal, Lauren E Wessel","doi":"10.1002/jso.70422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Upper extremity soft tissue sarcomas (UE STS) present unique management challenges; existing prognostic nomograms were developed from mixed anatomic cohorts. This study develops anatomically specific machine learning (ML) models to predict UE-STS outcomes and benchmarks them against established tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Time-to-event models for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS) were developed in 188 patients treated at a single sarcoma center, treating death as a competing risk. Five survival algorithms were compared within a nested cross-validation framework. Discrimination was benchmarked against the Sarculator, PERSARC, and MSKCC nomograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year event rates were 24% (LR), 20% (DM), and 13% (death) over a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Best-performing models achieved competing-risks concordance indices of 0.79 (LR), 0.67 (DM), and 0.75 (OS). Parsimonious models performed comparably. Discrimination was similar to Sarculator and PERSARC and higher than the MSKCC nomogram for LR (C-index 0.90 vs. 0.68). Predicted-risk groups separated clearly on cumulative-incidence and survival curves (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of anatomy-specific, time-to-event risk modeling in UE STS, achieving discrimination comparable to established nomograms despite a smaller cohort. Multicenter cohorts and multidimensional data may strengthen future efforts. External validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning-Based Recurrence and Survival Prediction in a Large Institutional Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Kameel Khabaz, Nicole J Newman-Hung, Ruiwen Ding, Derek Pham, Nicholas J Jackson, William Hsu, Nicholas M Bernthal, Lauren E Wessel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.70422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Upper extremity soft tissue sarcomas (UE STS) present unique management challenges; existing prognostic nomograms were developed from mixed anatomic cohorts. This study develops anatomically specific machine learning (ML) models to predict UE-STS outcomes and benchmarks them against established tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Time-to-event models for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS) were developed in 188 patients treated at a single sarcoma center, treating death as a competing risk. Five survival algorithms were compared within a nested cross-validation framework. Discrimination was benchmarked against the Sarculator, PERSARC, and MSKCC nomograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year event rates were 24% (LR), 20% (DM), and 13% (death) over a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Best-performing models achieved competing-risks concordance indices of 0.79 (LR), 0.67 (DM), and 0.75 (OS). Parsimonious models performed comparably. Discrimination was similar to Sarculator and PERSARC and higher than the MSKCC nomogram for LR (C-index 0.90 vs. 0.68). Predicted-risk groups separated clearly on cumulative-incidence and survival curves (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of anatomy-specific, time-to-event risk modeling in UE STS, achieving discrimination comparable to established nomograms despite a smaller cohort. Multicenter cohorts and multidimensional data may strengthen future efforts. External validation is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70422\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine Learning-Based Recurrence and Survival Prediction in a Large Institutional Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Cohort.
Background and objectives: Upper extremity soft tissue sarcomas (UE STS) present unique management challenges; existing prognostic nomograms were developed from mixed anatomic cohorts. This study develops anatomically specific machine learning (ML) models to predict UE-STS outcomes and benchmarks them against established tools.
Methods: Time-to-event models for local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS) were developed in 188 patients treated at a single sarcoma center, treating death as a competing risk. Five survival algorithms were compared within a nested cross-validation framework. Discrimination was benchmarked against the Sarculator, PERSARC, and MSKCC nomograms.
Results: Five-year event rates were 24% (LR), 20% (DM), and 13% (death) over a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Best-performing models achieved competing-risks concordance indices of 0.79 (LR), 0.67 (DM), and 0.75 (OS). Parsimonious models performed comparably. Discrimination was similar to Sarculator and PERSARC and higher than the MSKCC nomogram for LR (C-index 0.90 vs. 0.68). Predicted-risk groups separated clearly on cumulative-incidence and survival curves (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: These results demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of anatomy-specific, time-to-event risk modeling in UE STS, achieving discrimination comparable to established nomograms despite a smaller cohort. Multicenter cohorts and multidimensional data may strengthen future efforts. External validation is warranted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.