囊性-实性ADC在鉴别浆液黏液交界性肿瘤与子宫内膜异位症相关卵巢癌的MRI上的差异。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Masanori Ishida, Akihiko Hayakawa, Shigehiro Hayashi, Yoichi Araki, Elly Arizono, Akitoshi Kanagawa, Yukari Wakabayashi, Motoki Nakai, Hirotaka Nishi, Kazuhiro Saito
{"title":"囊性-实性ADC在鉴别浆液黏液交界性肿瘤与子宫内膜异位症相关卵巢癌的MRI上的差异。","authors":"Masanori Ishida, Akihiko Hayakawa, Shigehiro Hayashi, Yoichi Araki, Elly Arizono, Akitoshi Kanagawa, Yukari Wakabayashi, Motoki Nakai, Hirotaka Nishi, Kazuhiro Saito","doi":"10.1177/02841851261495789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSeromucinous borderline tumor (SMBT) and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) may show overlapping magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging may improve their preoperative differentiation.PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the cystic-solid apparent diffusion coefficient difference (ΔADC) for differentiating SMBT from EAOC.Material and MethodsThis retrospective single-center study included 49 patients with pathologically confirmed SMBT (n = 14) or EAOC (n = 35) who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in the cystic and solid components, and ΔADC was calculated as cystic ADC minus solid ADC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed with EAOC as the positive outcome.ResultsSMBT showed lower cystic ADC values and higher solid ADC values than EAOC, resulting in a smaller ΔADC. ΔADC and solid ADC yielded areas under the ROC curve of 0.924 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.817-1.000) and 0.918 (95% CI 0.837-1.000), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.862). At the internally derived ΔADC cutoff of 0.529 ×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, sensitivity was 94.3% (95% CI 80.8-99.3) and specificity was 92.9% (95% CI 66.1-99.8); because the cutoff was derived and evaluated in the same cohort, these performance estimates may be optimistic.ConclusionΔADC showed high diagnostic performance for differentiating SMBT from EAOC, but incremental diagnostic performance over solid ADC was not demonstrated. The internally derived cutoff and associated performance estimates require independent multicenter validation before clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851261495789"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cystic-solid ADC difference on MRI for differentiating seromucinous borderline tumor from endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Masanori Ishida, Akihiko Hayakawa, Shigehiro Hayashi, Yoichi Araki, Elly Arizono, Akitoshi Kanagawa, Yukari Wakabayashi, Motoki Nakai, Hirotaka Nishi, Kazuhiro Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851261495789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundSeromucinous borderline tumor (SMBT) and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) may show overlapping magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging may improve their preoperative differentiation.PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the cystic-solid apparent diffusion coefficient difference (ΔADC) for differentiating SMBT from EAOC.Material and MethodsThis retrospective single-center study included 49 patients with pathologically confirmed SMBT (n = 14) or EAOC (n = 35) who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in the cystic and solid components, and ΔADC was calculated as cystic ADC minus solid ADC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed with EAOC as the positive outcome.ResultsSMBT showed lower cystic ADC values and higher solid ADC values than EAOC, resulting in a smaller ΔADC. ΔADC and solid ADC yielded areas under the ROC curve of 0.924 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.817-1.000) and 0.918 (95% CI 0.837-1.000), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.862). At the internally derived ΔADC cutoff of 0.529 ×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, sensitivity was 94.3% (95% CI 80.8-99.3) and specificity was 92.9% (95% CI 66.1-99.8); because the cutoff was derived and evaluated in the same cohort, these performance estimates may be optimistic.ConclusionΔADC showed high diagnostic performance for differentiating SMBT from EAOC, but incremental diagnostic performance over solid ADC was not demonstrated. The internally derived cutoff and associated performance estimates require independent multicenter validation before clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2841851261495789\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851261495789\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851261495789","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cystic-solid ADC difference on MRI for differentiating seromucinous borderline tumor from endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.

BackgroundSeromucinous borderline tumor (SMBT) and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) may show overlapping magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging may improve their preoperative differentiation.PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the cystic-solid apparent diffusion coefficient difference (ΔADC) for differentiating SMBT from EAOC.Material and MethodsThis retrospective single-center study included 49 patients with pathologically confirmed SMBT (n = 14) or EAOC (n = 35) who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in the cystic and solid components, and ΔADC was calculated as cystic ADC minus solid ADC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed with EAOC as the positive outcome.ResultsSMBT showed lower cystic ADC values and higher solid ADC values than EAOC, resulting in a smaller ΔADC. ΔADC and solid ADC yielded areas under the ROC curve of 0.924 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.817-1.000) and 0.918 (95% CI 0.837-1.000), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.862). At the internally derived ΔADC cutoff of 0.529 ×10-3 mm2/s, sensitivity was 94.3% (95% CI 80.8-99.3) and specificity was 92.9% (95% CI 66.1-99.8); because the cutoff was derived and evaluated in the same cohort, these performance estimates may be optimistic.ConclusionΔADC showed high diagnostic performance for differentiating SMBT from EAOC, but incremental diagnostic performance over solid ADC was not demonstrated. The internally derived cutoff and associated performance estimates require independent multicenter validation before clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书