Abdullah Muhammad Moosa, Nusrat Sultana, Mahdi Muhammad Moosa, Md Miraiz Hossain
{"title":"基于孟加拉语作者归属数据集的停顿词文体作用分析","authors":"Abdullah Muhammad Moosa, Nusrat Sultana, Mahdi Muhammad Moosa, Md Miraiz Hossain","doi":"10.1155/int/2588181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stop-word removal is a common preprocessing step in natural language processing, but in authorship attribution, frequent function words may preserve important stylistic information. For Bangla, the effect of stop-word removal remains insufficiently examined, particularly beyond literary corpora and under consistent comparisons between classical and neural models. This study introduces the Bangla Authorship Recognition Dataset of 10 Authors (BARD10), a curated dataset of 2337 postlevel texts from 10 contemporary Bangla authors, and evaluates it alongside the literary benchmark Bangla Authorship Attribution Dataset (BAAD16). We compare four model families: support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), an embedding-based multilayer perceptron (MLP), and BanglaBERT, a Bangla-adapted bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model, under stop-word–retained and stop-word–removed conditions. For the classical models, we further examine word-level, character-level, and subword-level term frequency–inverse document frequency (TF–IDF) representations. Across both datasets, sparse TF–IDF features combined with linear SVM achieve the strongest overall performance, reaching a macro-F1 of 0.9956 on BAAD16 and 0.9232 ± 0.0086 on BARD10. BanglaBERT remains competitive but does not surpass the best sparse-feature configurations. The results show that the effect of stop-word removal is not uniform across models, tokenization settings, or datasets. In particular, stop-words often preserve useful authorial information in BARD10, indicating their importance in contemporary online Bangla writing. A word-level Δ-recall analysis further shows that individual stop-word effects are heterogeneous and author-dependent. These findings suggest that Bangla stop-words should not be treated as uniformly disposable preprocessing noise and that interpretable sparse-feature baselines remain essential reference points for Bangla authorship attribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":14089,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/int/2588181","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BARD10: A Bangla Authorship Attribution Dataset for Analyzing the Stylistic Role of Stop-Words\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Muhammad Moosa, Nusrat Sultana, Mahdi Muhammad Moosa, Md Miraiz Hossain\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/int/2588181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Stop-word removal is a common preprocessing step in natural language processing, but in authorship attribution, frequent function words may preserve important stylistic information. For Bangla, the effect of stop-word removal remains insufficiently examined, particularly beyond literary corpora and under consistent comparisons between classical and neural models. This study introduces the Bangla Authorship Recognition Dataset of 10 Authors (BARD10), a curated dataset of 2337 postlevel texts from 10 contemporary Bangla authors, and evaluates it alongside the literary benchmark Bangla Authorship Attribution Dataset (BAAD16). We compare four model families: support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), an embedding-based multilayer perceptron (MLP), and BanglaBERT, a Bangla-adapted bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model, under stop-word–retained and stop-word–removed conditions. For the classical models, we further examine word-level, character-level, and subword-level term frequency–inverse document frequency (TF–IDF) representations. Across both datasets, sparse TF–IDF features combined with linear SVM achieve the strongest overall performance, reaching a macro-F1 of 0.9956 on BAAD16 and 0.9232 ± 0.0086 on BARD10. BanglaBERT remains competitive but does not surpass the best sparse-feature configurations. The results show that the effect of stop-word removal is not uniform across models, tokenization settings, or datasets. In particular, stop-words often preserve useful authorial information in BARD10, indicating their importance in contemporary online Bangla writing. A word-level Δ-recall analysis further shows that individual stop-word effects are heterogeneous and author-dependent. These findings suggest that Bangla stop-words should not be treated as uniformly disposable preprocessing noise and that interpretable sparse-feature baselines remain essential reference points for Bangla authorship attribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intelligent Systems\",\"volume\":\"2026 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/int/2588181\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intelligent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/int/2588181\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/int/2588181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
BARD10: A Bangla Authorship Attribution Dataset for Analyzing the Stylistic Role of Stop-Words
Stop-word removal is a common preprocessing step in natural language processing, but in authorship attribution, frequent function words may preserve important stylistic information. For Bangla, the effect of stop-word removal remains insufficiently examined, particularly beyond literary corpora and under consistent comparisons between classical and neural models. This study introduces the Bangla Authorship Recognition Dataset of 10 Authors (BARD10), a curated dataset of 2337 postlevel texts from 10 contemporary Bangla authors, and evaluates it alongside the literary benchmark Bangla Authorship Attribution Dataset (BAAD16). We compare four model families: support vector machine (SVM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), an embedding-based multilayer perceptron (MLP), and BanglaBERT, a Bangla-adapted bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model, under stop-word–retained and stop-word–removed conditions. For the classical models, we further examine word-level, character-level, and subword-level term frequency–inverse document frequency (TF–IDF) representations. Across both datasets, sparse TF–IDF features combined with linear SVM achieve the strongest overall performance, reaching a macro-F1 of 0.9956 on BAAD16 and 0.9232 ± 0.0086 on BARD10. BanglaBERT remains competitive but does not surpass the best sparse-feature configurations. The results show that the effect of stop-word removal is not uniform across models, tokenization settings, or datasets. In particular, stop-words often preserve useful authorial information in BARD10, indicating their importance in contemporary online Bangla writing. A word-level Δ-recall analysis further shows that individual stop-word effects are heterogeneous and author-dependent. These findings suggest that Bangla stop-words should not be treated as uniformly disposable preprocessing noise and that interpretable sparse-feature baselines remain essential reference points for Bangla authorship attribution.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Intelligent Systems serves as a forum for individuals interested in tapping into the vast theories based on intelligent systems construction. With its peer-reviewed format, the journal explores several fascinating editorials written by today''s experts in the field. Because new developments are being introduced each day, there''s much to be learned — examination, analysis creation, information retrieval, man–computer interactions, and more. The International Journal of Intelligent Systems uses charts and illustrations to demonstrate these ground-breaking issues, and encourages readers to share their thoughts and experiences.