{"title":"幼儿对图形领域中符号-指称关系的自发理解。","authors":"Gregor Kachel, Daniel B M Haun, Manuel Bohn","doi":"10.1093/chidev/aacag179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Young children's communicative skills in language and gesture are well documented, yet much less is known about their -ability to interpret graphical symbols. Across three coordinated studies using identical procedures, we examined children's spontaneous comprehension of unfamiliar graphic symbols in a simple object-choice task spanning a broad range of symbol-referent relationships. Each study included four conditions in which reference was established through direct representation, part-whole relations, analogies in size, number, and form, or gestalt principles such as orientation, alignment, and figure-ground organization. Participants were 304 German-speaking children continuously sampled from age 3 to 7 (Study 1, N = 106, 51 female; Study 2, N = 99, 49 female; Study 3, N = 99, 55 female). Children reliably used direct representations to identify target objects before age 3, whereas group-level success in less iconic conditions emerged later but consistently before school entry. Across conditions involving abstract analogical correspondences, results indicate converging developments in symbolic competence around age 4. Together, these studies trace children's developing ability to understand graphical reference across a continuum from iconic to abstract and offer one of the most systematic investigations to date of how young children derive meaning from unfamiliar graphic symbols.</p>","PeriodicalId":10109,"journal":{"name":"Child development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young children's spontaneous comprehension of symbol-referent relationships in the graphic domain.\",\"authors\":\"Gregor Kachel, Daniel B M Haun, Manuel Bohn\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/chidev/aacag179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Young children's communicative skills in language and gesture are well documented, yet much less is known about their -ability to interpret graphical symbols. Across three coordinated studies using identical procedures, we examined children's spontaneous comprehension of unfamiliar graphic symbols in a simple object-choice task spanning a broad range of symbol-referent relationships. Each study included four conditions in which reference was established through direct representation, part-whole relations, analogies in size, number, and form, or gestalt principles such as orientation, alignment, and figure-ground organization. Participants were 304 German-speaking children continuously sampled from age 3 to 7 (Study 1, N = 106, 51 female; Study 2, N = 99, 49 female; Study 3, N = 99, 55 female). Children reliably used direct representations to identify target objects before age 3, whereas group-level success in less iconic conditions emerged later but consistently before school entry. Across conditions involving abstract analogical correspondences, results indicate converging developments in symbolic competence around age 4. Together, these studies trace children's developing ability to understand graphical reference across a continuum from iconic to abstract and offer one of the most systematic investigations to date of how young children derive meaning from unfamiliar graphic symbols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacag179\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacag179","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Young children's spontaneous comprehension of symbol-referent relationships in the graphic domain.
Young children's communicative skills in language and gesture are well documented, yet much less is known about their -ability to interpret graphical symbols. Across three coordinated studies using identical procedures, we examined children's spontaneous comprehension of unfamiliar graphic symbols in a simple object-choice task spanning a broad range of symbol-referent relationships. Each study included four conditions in which reference was established through direct representation, part-whole relations, analogies in size, number, and form, or gestalt principles such as orientation, alignment, and figure-ground organization. Participants were 304 German-speaking children continuously sampled from age 3 to 7 (Study 1, N = 106, 51 female; Study 2, N = 99, 49 female; Study 3, N = 99, 55 female). Children reliably used direct representations to identify target objects before age 3, whereas group-level success in less iconic conditions emerged later but consistently before school entry. Across conditions involving abstract analogical correspondences, results indicate converging developments in symbolic competence around age 4. Together, these studies trace children's developing ability to understand graphical reference across a continuum from iconic to abstract and offer one of the most systematic investigations to date of how young children derive meaning from unfamiliar graphic symbols.
期刊介绍:
As the flagship journal of the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD), Child Development has published articles, essays, reviews, and tutorials on various topics in the field of child development since 1930. Spanning many disciplines, the journal provides the latest research, not only for researchers and theoreticians, but also for child psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, psychiatric social workers, specialists in early childhood education, educational psychologists, special education teachers, and other researchers. In addition to six issues per year of Child Development, subscribers to the journal also receive a full subscription to Child Development Perspectives and Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.