加纳可持续小规模采矿的数字化转型和智能采矿:技术-治理-生计互动的系统回顾

IF 3.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Albert Abraham Arhin, Monica Addison, Nicholas Opoku
{"title":"加纳可持续小规模采矿的数字化转型和智能采矿:技术-治理-生计互动的系统回顾","authors":"Albert Abraham Arhin,&nbsp;Monica Addison,&nbsp;Nicholas Opoku","doi":"10.1007/s00267-026-02595-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Illegal artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM), or galamsey, in Ghana presents persistent environmental, social, and governance challenges despite growing policy attention. Recent literature emphasizes digital and smart mining technologies such as remote sensing, machine learning, and block chain as potential solutions for monitoring, formalisation, and supply chain transparency. However, evidence on their effectiveness remains fragmented and unevenly distributed. This systematic review synthesizes 25 empirical and policy-relevant studies published between 2020 and 2025 to evaluate how digital interventions interact with governance structures and livelihood realities. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the studies were assessed across four domains: technology deployment, environmental sustainability, workforce and socioeconomic impacts, and institutional governance. A four-objective contribution framework (High/Medium/Low) was applied, and the concept of technology–governance–livelihood alignment was introduced to explain why technically viable solutions often fail to produce expected outcomes in practice. The findings indicate that while satellite-based monitoring and machine learning models are technically capable of detecting illegal mining and environmental degradation, their effectiveness is constrained by fragmented institutional mandates, limited enforcement capacity, and socio-economic barriers affecting miners’ participation. Environmental harms, particularly mercury contamination and deforestation, are well-documented, yet workforce and gender impacts remain critically understudied. The review demonstrates that successful ASM interventions require integrated strategies that combine technological innovation with governance reform spanning national regulatory bodies and customary/traditional authoritiesand livelihood-sensitive approaches. Such governance reforms will also need to pay attention to the role of local government assemblies as the development authority of areas. The alignment lens provides a conceptual framework for designing interventions that are technically robust, institutionally feasible, and socially inclusive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":"76 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Transformation and Smart Mining for Sustainable Small-Scale Mining in Ghana: A Systematic Review of Technology–Governance–Livelihood Interactions\",\"authors\":\"Albert Abraham Arhin,&nbsp;Monica Addison,&nbsp;Nicholas Opoku\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00267-026-02595-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Illegal artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM), or galamsey, in Ghana presents persistent environmental, social, and governance challenges despite growing policy attention. Recent literature emphasizes digital and smart mining technologies such as remote sensing, machine learning, and block chain as potential solutions for monitoring, formalisation, and supply chain transparency. However, evidence on their effectiveness remains fragmented and unevenly distributed. This systematic review synthesizes 25 empirical and policy-relevant studies published between 2020 and 2025 to evaluate how digital interventions interact with governance structures and livelihood realities. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the studies were assessed across four domains: technology deployment, environmental sustainability, workforce and socioeconomic impacts, and institutional governance. A four-objective contribution framework (High/Medium/Low) was applied, and the concept of technology–governance–livelihood alignment was introduced to explain why technically viable solutions often fail to produce expected outcomes in practice. The findings indicate that while satellite-based monitoring and machine learning models are technically capable of detecting illegal mining and environmental degradation, their effectiveness is constrained by fragmented institutional mandates, limited enforcement capacity, and socio-economic barriers affecting miners’ participation. Environmental harms, particularly mercury contamination and deforestation, are well-documented, yet workforce and gender impacts remain critically understudied. The review demonstrates that successful ASM interventions require integrated strategies that combine technological innovation with governance reform spanning national regulatory bodies and customary/traditional authoritiesand livelihood-sensitive approaches. Such governance reforms will also need to pay attention to the role of local government assemblies as the development authority of areas. The alignment lens provides a conceptual framework for designing interventions that are technically robust, institutionally feasible, and socially inclusive.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"76 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-026-02595-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-026-02595-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加纳的非法手工和小规模采矿(ASM),或galamsey,尽管受到越来越多的政策关注,但仍面临着持续的环境、社会和治理挑战。最近的文献强调数字和智能采矿技术,如遥感、机器学习和区块链,是监测、形式化和供应链透明度的潜在解决方案。然而,关于其有效性的证据仍然是支离破碎且分布不均的。本系统综述综合了2020年至2025年期间发表的25项实证和政策相关研究,以评估数字干预措施如何与治理结构和生计现实相互作用。根据PRISMA 2020指南,这些研究在四个领域进行了评估:技术部署、环境可持续性、劳动力和社会经济影响以及机构治理。采用了一个四目标贡献框架(高/中/低),并引入了技术-治理-生计协调的概念,以解释为什么技术上可行的解决方案往往不能在实践中产生预期结果。研究结果表明,虽然基于卫星的监测和机器学习模型在技术上能够检测非法采矿和环境退化,但其有效性受到分散的机构授权、有限的执法能力和影响矿工参与的社会经济障碍的限制。环境危害,特别是汞污染和森林砍伐,有充分的记录,但对劳动力和性别影响的研究仍然严重不足。该综述表明,成功的ASM干预措施需要综合战略,将技术创新与跨越国家监管机构和习惯/传统当局的治理改革以及对生计敏感的方法相结合。这种治理改革还需要注意地方政府议会作为地区发展主管机构的作用。校准镜头为设计干预措施提供了一个概念性框架,这些干预措施在技术上是稳健的,在制度上是可行的,并且具有社会包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Transformation and Smart Mining for Sustainable Small-Scale Mining in Ghana: A Systematic Review of Technology–Governance–Livelihood Interactions

Illegal artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM), or galamsey, in Ghana presents persistent environmental, social, and governance challenges despite growing policy attention. Recent literature emphasizes digital and smart mining technologies such as remote sensing, machine learning, and block chain as potential solutions for monitoring, formalisation, and supply chain transparency. However, evidence on their effectiveness remains fragmented and unevenly distributed. This systematic review synthesizes 25 empirical and policy-relevant studies published between 2020 and 2025 to evaluate how digital interventions interact with governance structures and livelihood realities. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, the studies were assessed across four domains: technology deployment, environmental sustainability, workforce and socioeconomic impacts, and institutional governance. A four-objective contribution framework (High/Medium/Low) was applied, and the concept of technology–governance–livelihood alignment was introduced to explain why technically viable solutions often fail to produce expected outcomes in practice. The findings indicate that while satellite-based monitoring and machine learning models are technically capable of detecting illegal mining and environmental degradation, their effectiveness is constrained by fragmented institutional mandates, limited enforcement capacity, and socio-economic barriers affecting miners’ participation. Environmental harms, particularly mercury contamination and deforestation, are well-documented, yet workforce and gender impacts remain critically understudied. The review demonstrates that successful ASM interventions require integrated strategies that combine technological innovation with governance reform spanning national regulatory bodies and customary/traditional authoritiesand livelihood-sensitive approaches. Such governance reforms will also need to pay attention to the role of local government assemblies as the development authority of areas. The alignment lens provides a conceptual framework for designing interventions that are technically robust, institutionally feasible, and socially inclusive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书