{"title":"当贸易政策冲击冲击深渊:2025年大豆期货市场的定价、波动和投机","authors":"Yasin Yildirim, Sandro Steinbach","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores responses to major trade policy shocks in the soybean futures market in 2025. Using an event‐study framework, we analyse short‐run movements in soybean futures prices, historical volatility, implied volatility and speculative positioning around three major policy shocks: the U.S. tariff announcement targeting China on February 1, the reciprocal tariff announcement on April 2, and Argentina's temporary suspension of soybean export taxes on September 22. Broader in scope, the April reciprocal tariff package was associated with the clearest and strongest response. Futures prices fell by about 6% within two trading days, while implied volatility rose sharply. Following the February announcement, implied volatility increased immediately and then receded, while downward repricing became evident only after China's retaliatory tariffs took effect, suggesting that uncertainty rose before the implications for U.S. export demand became clearer. Argentina's export‐tax suspension, by contrast, was followed by limited repricing, a later decline in implied volatility, and greater speculative positioning relative to commercial hedging needs. The cross‐event comparison suggests that the timing and composition of market adjustment vary with the scope, directness and subsequent evolution of each policy episode.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Trade Policy Shocks Hit the Pit: Pricing, Volatility and Speculation in the 2025 Soybean Futures Market\",\"authors\":\"Yasin Yildirim, Sandro Steinbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1477-9552.70091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores responses to major trade policy shocks in the soybean futures market in 2025. Using an event‐study framework, we analyse short‐run movements in soybean futures prices, historical volatility, implied volatility and speculative positioning around three major policy shocks: the U.S. tariff announcement targeting China on February 1, the reciprocal tariff announcement on April 2, and Argentina's temporary suspension of soybean export taxes on September 22. Broader in scope, the April reciprocal tariff package was associated with the clearest and strongest response. Futures prices fell by about 6% within two trading days, while implied volatility rose sharply. Following the February announcement, implied volatility increased immediately and then receded, while downward repricing became evident only after China's retaliatory tariffs took effect, suggesting that uncertainty rose before the implications for U.S. export demand became clearer. Argentina's export‐tax suspension, by contrast, was followed by limited repricing, a later decline in implied volatility, and greater speculative positioning relative to commercial hedging needs. The cross‐event comparison suggests that the timing and composition of market adjustment vary with the scope, directness and subsequent evolution of each policy episode.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
When Trade Policy Shocks Hit the Pit: Pricing, Volatility and Speculation in the 2025 Soybean Futures Market
This paper explores responses to major trade policy shocks in the soybean futures market in 2025. Using an event‐study framework, we analyse short‐run movements in soybean futures prices, historical volatility, implied volatility and speculative positioning around three major policy shocks: the U.S. tariff announcement targeting China on February 1, the reciprocal tariff announcement on April 2, and Argentina's temporary suspension of soybean export taxes on September 22. Broader in scope, the April reciprocal tariff package was associated with the clearest and strongest response. Futures prices fell by about 6% within two trading days, while implied volatility rose sharply. Following the February announcement, implied volatility increased immediately and then receded, while downward repricing became evident only after China's retaliatory tariffs took effect, suggesting that uncertainty rose before the implications for U.S. export demand became clearer. Argentina's export‐tax suspension, by contrast, was followed by limited repricing, a later decline in implied volatility, and greater speculative positioning relative to commercial hedging needs. The cross‐event comparison suggests that the timing and composition of market adjustment vary with the scope, directness and subsequent evolution of each policy episode.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment.
Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.