当贸易政策冲击冲击深渊:2025年大豆期货市场的定价、波动和投机

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Yasin Yildirim, Sandro Steinbach
{"title":"当贸易政策冲击冲击深渊:2025年大豆期货市场的定价、波动和投机","authors":"Yasin Yildirim, Sandro Steinbach","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores responses to major trade policy shocks in the soybean futures market in 2025. Using an event‐study framework, we analyse short‐run movements in soybean futures prices, historical volatility, implied volatility and speculative positioning around three major policy shocks: the U.S. tariff announcement targeting China on February 1, the reciprocal tariff announcement on April 2, and Argentina's temporary suspension of soybean export taxes on September 22. Broader in scope, the April reciprocal tariff package was associated with the clearest and strongest response. Futures prices fell by about 6% within two trading days, while implied volatility rose sharply. Following the February announcement, implied volatility increased immediately and then receded, while downward repricing became evident only after China's retaliatory tariffs took effect, suggesting that uncertainty rose before the implications for U.S. export demand became clearer. Argentina's export‐tax suspension, by contrast, was followed by limited repricing, a later decline in implied volatility, and greater speculative positioning relative to commercial hedging needs. The cross‐event comparison suggests that the timing and composition of market adjustment vary with the scope, directness and subsequent evolution of each policy episode.","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Trade Policy Shocks Hit the Pit: Pricing, Volatility and Speculation in the 2025 Soybean Futures Market\",\"authors\":\"Yasin Yildirim, Sandro Steinbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1477-9552.70091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores responses to major trade policy shocks in the soybean futures market in 2025. Using an event‐study framework, we analyse short‐run movements in soybean futures prices, historical volatility, implied volatility and speculative positioning around three major policy shocks: the U.S. tariff announcement targeting China on February 1, the reciprocal tariff announcement on April 2, and Argentina's temporary suspension of soybean export taxes on September 22. Broader in scope, the April reciprocal tariff package was associated with the clearest and strongest response. Futures prices fell by about 6% within two trading days, while implied volatility rose sharply. Following the February announcement, implied volatility increased immediately and then receded, while downward repricing became evident only after China's retaliatory tariffs took effect, suggesting that uncertainty rose before the implications for U.S. export demand became clearer. Argentina's export‐tax suspension, by contrast, was followed by limited repricing, a later decline in implied volatility, and greater speculative positioning relative to commercial hedging needs. The cross‐event comparison suggests that the timing and composition of market adjustment vary with the scope, directness and subsequent evolution of each policy episode.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.70091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了2025年大豆期货市场应对主要贸易政策冲击的对策。利用事件研究框架,我们分析了大豆期货价格的短期走势、历史波动率、隐含波动率和围绕三大政策冲击的投机仓位:美国于2月1日宣布对中国征收关税,4月2日宣布互惠关税,以及阿根廷于9月22日暂停大豆出口税。在更广泛的范围内,4月份的互惠关税一揽子计划得到了最明确和最强烈的回应。期货价格在两个交易日内下跌了约6%,隐含波动率大幅上升。在2月份的声明之后,隐含波动率立即上升,然后回落,而向下重新定价只是在中国的报复性关税生效后才变得明显,这表明不确定性在对美国出口需求的影响变得更加清晰之前就上升了。相比之下,阿根廷暂停出口税之后,出现了有限的重新定价,随后隐含波动率下降,以及相对于商业对冲需求的更多投机头寸。交叉事件比较表明,市场调整的时机和构成随着每次政策事件的范围、直接性和后续演变而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Trade Policy Shocks Hit the Pit: Pricing, Volatility and Speculation in the 2025 Soybean Futures Market
This paper explores responses to major trade policy shocks in the soybean futures market in 2025. Using an event‐study framework, we analyse short‐run movements in soybean futures prices, historical volatility, implied volatility and speculative positioning around three major policy shocks: the U.S. tariff announcement targeting China on February 1, the reciprocal tariff announcement on April 2, and Argentina's temporary suspension of soybean export taxes on September 22. Broader in scope, the April reciprocal tariff package was associated with the clearest and strongest response. Futures prices fell by about 6% within two trading days, while implied volatility rose sharply. Following the February announcement, implied volatility increased immediately and then receded, while downward repricing became evident only after China's retaliatory tariffs took effect, suggesting that uncertainty rose before the implications for U.S. export demand became clearer. Argentina's export‐tax suspension, by contrast, was followed by limited repricing, a later decline in implied volatility, and greater speculative positioning relative to commercial hedging needs. The cross‐event comparison suggests that the timing and composition of market adjustment vary with the scope, directness and subsequent evolution of each policy episode.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment. Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书