利益相关者对乌干达远程医疗接受和经验的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 2.8
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2026-10-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0007047
Irene Semakula, Sande Slivesteri, Benjamin Mwesige, Mukooza Edward, Benedict Akimana, Vincent Micheal Kiberu
{"title":"利益相关者对乌干达远程医疗接受和经验的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"Irene Semakula, Sande Slivesteri, Benjamin Mwesige, Mukooza Edward, Benedict Akimana, Vincent Micheal Kiberu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0007047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Uganda and other low- and middle-income countries, access to healthcare is constrained by shortages of health workers, long travel distances, and inadequate infrastructure. Telemedicine offers a potential solution, but its effectiveness depends on how key stakeholders perceive, accept, and experience it. This study explored the acceptance and experiences of telemedicine by policymakers, healthcare providers, and service users in Kampala, Uganda. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted between November 2024 and February 2025 at four sites in Kampala: Rocket Health, Uganda Cancer Institute, Butabika National Referral Mental Hospital, and the Ministry of Health. Participants were purposively selected to ensure direct experience with telemedicine. Data was collected through 15 key informant interviews with policymakers and healthcare providers and three focus group discussions with service users (patients and caregivers) who had accessed telemedicine within the previous year. Interviews and discussions were conducted in English or Luganda, audio-recorded with consent, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach, supported by NVivo 12 software. Three main themes emerged: perceived benefits, perceived challenges, and recommendations for improving telemedicine. Participants described telemedicine as convenient, reducing travel and contributing to cost and time savings. It also enhanced continuity of care, flexibility, privacy, and autonomy. These benefits were particularly evident among people with disabilities and digitally literate urban users. However, challenges included poor internet connectivity, limited infrastructure, low digital literacy, concerns about diagnostic accuracy without physical examination, and variable levels of trust, with some participants preferring in-person interaction. Telemedicine was perceived as acceptable and useful. However, its broader adoption is limited by structural, technical, and trust-related barriers. Addressing these challenges will require investment in infrastructure, strengthened digital literacy, provider training, increased public awareness, and a robust national telemedicine policy to support equitable and sustainable integration into healthcare delivery in Uganda.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"6 10","pages":"e0007047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13645091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stakeholder perspectives on telemedicine acceptance and experiences in Uganda: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Irene Semakula, Sande Slivesteri, Benjamin Mwesige, Mukooza Edward, Benedict Akimana, Vincent Micheal Kiberu\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0007047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Uganda and other low- and middle-income countries, access to healthcare is constrained by shortages of health workers, long travel distances, and inadequate infrastructure. Telemedicine offers a potential solution, but its effectiveness depends on how key stakeholders perceive, accept, and experience it. This study explored the acceptance and experiences of telemedicine by policymakers, healthcare providers, and service users in Kampala, Uganda. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted between November 2024 and February 2025 at four sites in Kampala: Rocket Health, Uganda Cancer Institute, Butabika National Referral Mental Hospital, and the Ministry of Health. Participants were purposively selected to ensure direct experience with telemedicine. Data was collected through 15 key informant interviews with policymakers and healthcare providers and three focus group discussions with service users (patients and caregivers) who had accessed telemedicine within the previous year. Interviews and discussions were conducted in English or Luganda, audio-recorded with consent, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach, supported by NVivo 12 software. Three main themes emerged: perceived benefits, perceived challenges, and recommendations for improving telemedicine. Participants described telemedicine as convenient, reducing travel and contributing to cost and time savings. It also enhanced continuity of care, flexibility, privacy, and autonomy. These benefits were particularly evident among people with disabilities and digitally literate urban users. However, challenges included poor internet connectivity, limited infrastructure, low digital literacy, concerns about diagnostic accuracy without physical examination, and variable levels of trust, with some participants preferring in-person interaction. Telemedicine was perceived as acceptable and useful. However, its broader adoption is limited by structural, technical, and trust-related barriers. Addressing these challenges will require investment in infrastructure, strengthened digital literacy, provider training, increased public awareness, and a robust national telemedicine policy to support equitable and sustainable integration into healthcare delivery in Uganda.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"6 10\",\"pages\":\"e0007047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13645091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stakeholder perspectives on telemedicine acceptance and experiences in Uganda: A qualitative study.

In Uganda and other low- and middle-income countries, access to healthcare is constrained by shortages of health workers, long travel distances, and inadequate infrastructure. Telemedicine offers a potential solution, but its effectiveness depends on how key stakeholders perceive, accept, and experience it. This study explored the acceptance and experiences of telemedicine by policymakers, healthcare providers, and service users in Kampala, Uganda. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted between November 2024 and February 2025 at four sites in Kampala: Rocket Health, Uganda Cancer Institute, Butabika National Referral Mental Hospital, and the Ministry of Health. Participants were purposively selected to ensure direct experience with telemedicine. Data was collected through 15 key informant interviews with policymakers and healthcare providers and three focus group discussions with service users (patients and caregivers) who had accessed telemedicine within the previous year. Interviews and discussions were conducted in English or Luganda, audio-recorded with consent, and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach, supported by NVivo 12 software. Three main themes emerged: perceived benefits, perceived challenges, and recommendations for improving telemedicine. Participants described telemedicine as convenient, reducing travel and contributing to cost and time savings. It also enhanced continuity of care, flexibility, privacy, and autonomy. These benefits were particularly evident among people with disabilities and digitally literate urban users. However, challenges included poor internet connectivity, limited infrastructure, low digital literacy, concerns about diagnostic accuracy without physical examination, and variable levels of trust, with some participants preferring in-person interaction. Telemedicine was perceived as acceptable and useful. However, its broader adoption is limited by structural, technical, and trust-related barriers. Addressing these challenges will require investment in infrastructure, strengthened digital literacy, provider training, increased public awareness, and a robust national telemedicine policy to support equitable and sustainable integration into healthcare delivery in Uganda.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书