奥本海姆氏Lehrbuch多发性神经炎,1894-1923:病因扩展中的术语稳定性。

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Albert Grüger
{"title":"奥本海姆氏Lehrbuch多发性神经炎,1894-1923:病因扩展中的术语稳定性。","authors":"Albert Grüger","doi":"10.1080/0964704X.2026.2739353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The substitution of <i>polyneuropathy</i> for <i>polyneuritis</i> renamed an entire category of peripheral-nerve disease, yet the moment of exchange has never been dated against the successive editions of a single authority. This study tests terminological continuity within the seven editions of Hermann Oppenheim's influential <i>Lehrbuch der Nervenkrankheiten</i> (1894-1923). Repository optical character recognition (OCR; ABBYY FineReader) across all 11 physical volumes was searched for <i>Polyneuropath-</i> forms. Seven predefined 49-page windows were separately subjected to repeat OCR as a technical cross-check; the etiological sections and selected passages were checked against facsimiles. Serial comparison of the chapter heading, etiological framing, and pathological description was performed, and the etiological causes named in each edition were coded inductively. No target form was identified in any edition, whereas positive controls were consistently recovered. The chapter heading, core etiological statement, and principal pathological formulation remained stable across all seven editions. The source matrix shows that the catalog of named etiological entries expanded from 31 to 54, while the clinicopathological framework persisted unchanged. A direct title-level contrast appears in English by 1938. <i>Polyneuritis</i> remained a durable clinicopathological umbrella whose etiological range could grow without lexical replacement. The findings support non-adoption of <i>Polyneuropathie</i> within this textbook tradition through 1923 and document terminological inertia as a form of epistemic conservatism.</p>","PeriodicalId":49997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polyneuritis in Oppenheim's <i>Lehrbuch</i>, 1894-1923: Terminological stability amid etiological expansion.\",\"authors\":\"Albert Grüger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0964704X.2026.2739353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The substitution of <i>polyneuropathy</i> for <i>polyneuritis</i> renamed an entire category of peripheral-nerve disease, yet the moment of exchange has never been dated against the successive editions of a single authority. This study tests terminological continuity within the seven editions of Hermann Oppenheim's influential <i>Lehrbuch der Nervenkrankheiten</i> (1894-1923). Repository optical character recognition (OCR; ABBYY FineReader) across all 11 physical volumes was searched for <i>Polyneuropath-</i> forms. Seven predefined 49-page windows were separately subjected to repeat OCR as a technical cross-check; the etiological sections and selected passages were checked against facsimiles. Serial comparison of the chapter heading, etiological framing, and pathological description was performed, and the etiological causes named in each edition were coded inductively. No target form was identified in any edition, whereas positive controls were consistently recovered. The chapter heading, core etiological statement, and principal pathological formulation remained stable across all seven editions. The source matrix shows that the catalog of named etiological entries expanded from 31 to 54, while the clinicopathological framework persisted unchanged. A direct title-level contrast appears in English by 1938. <i>Polyneuritis</i> remained a durable clinicopathological umbrella whose etiological range could grow without lexical replacement. The findings support non-adoption of <i>Polyneuropathie</i> within this textbook tradition through 1923 and document terminological inertia as a form of epistemic conservatism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2026.2739353\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2026.2739353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polyneuritis in Oppenheim's Lehrbuch, 1894-1923: Terminological stability amid etiological expansion.

The substitution of polyneuropathy for polyneuritis renamed an entire category of peripheral-nerve disease, yet the moment of exchange has never been dated against the successive editions of a single authority. This study tests terminological continuity within the seven editions of Hermann Oppenheim's influential Lehrbuch der Nervenkrankheiten (1894-1923). Repository optical character recognition (OCR; ABBYY FineReader) across all 11 physical volumes was searched for Polyneuropath- forms. Seven predefined 49-page windows were separately subjected to repeat OCR as a technical cross-check; the etiological sections and selected passages were checked against facsimiles. Serial comparison of the chapter heading, etiological framing, and pathological description was performed, and the etiological causes named in each edition were coded inductively. No target form was identified in any edition, whereas positive controls were consistently recovered. The chapter heading, core etiological statement, and principal pathological formulation remained stable across all seven editions. The source matrix shows that the catalog of named etiological entries expanded from 31 to 54, while the clinicopathological framework persisted unchanged. A direct title-level contrast appears in English by 1938. Polyneuritis remained a durable clinicopathological umbrella whose etiological range could grow without lexical replacement. The findings support non-adoption of Polyneuropathie within this textbook tradition through 1923 and document terminological inertia as a form of epistemic conservatism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of the Neurosciences is the leading communication platform dealing with the historical roots of the basic and applied neurosciences. Its domains cover historical perspectives and developments, including biographical studies, disorders, institutions, documents, and instrumentation in neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropsychology, and the behavioral neurosciences. The history of ideas, changes in society and medicine, and the connections with other disciplines (e.g., the arts, philosophy, psychology) are welcome. In addition to original, full-length papers, the journal welcomes informative short communications, letters to the editors, book reviews, and contributions to its NeuroWords and Neurognostics columns. All manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by an Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, full- and short-length papers are subject to peer review (double blind, if requested) by at least 2 anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书