Vivek Shrivastav, Mani K Chettri, Hemam D. Singh, Britan Singh, Rupak Mukherjee
{"title":"天体物理和实验室冲击中无碰撞等离子体的维贝尔不稳定性","authors":"Vivek Shrivastav, Mani K Chettri, Hemam D. Singh, Britan Singh, Rupak Mukherjee","doi":"10.1002/ctpp.70147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We present a systematic cold-fluid analysis of the purely transverse Weibel (current-filamentation) instability across four regimes: non-relativistic (NR) single-species, NR multi-species, relativistic single-species and relativistic multi-species (electron–positron and electron–proton). Beginning from the linearized fluid equations, we derive the dispersion relations in each regime and extract scaling laws for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>γ</mi>\n <mi>max</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\gamma}_{\\mathrm{max}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>k</mi>\n <mi>max</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>ω</mi>\n <mi>pi</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {k}_{\\mathrm{max}}={\\omega}_{pi}/c $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. The main contributions are: (i) explicit regime-transition criteria in the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mfenced>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>v</mi>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mi>i</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>m</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\left({v}_0/c,{m}_i/{m}_e\\right) $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> parameter space; (ii) contour maps of relativistic suppression and mass-ratio dependence serving as diagnostic charts and (iii) an assessment of where the purely transverse mode dominates over competing instabilities. Relativistic corrections suppress <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>γ</mi>\n <mi>max</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\gamma}_{\\mathrm{max}} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> by up to 40% above <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>v</mi>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>≈</mo>\n <mn>0.2</mn>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {v}_0\\approx 0.2c $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, peaking near <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>v</mi>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </msub>\n <mo>≈</mo>\n <mn>0.9</mn>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {v}_0\\approx 0.9c $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. For the tabletop laser experiment of Bai et al., the predicted ion skin depth <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <mi>i</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>≈</mo>\n <mn>31.7</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>μm</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {d}_i\\approx 31.7\\kern0.16em \\upmu \\mathrm{m} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> agrees with the observed filament spacing to within 2%, and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>B</mi>\n <mi>sat</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>≈</mo>\n <mn>2.3</mn>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <msup>\n <mn>10</mn>\n <mn>4</mn>\n </msup>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>T</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {B}_{\\mathrm{sat}}\\approx 2.3\\times {10}^4\\kern0.5em \\mathrm{T} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is consistent with the measured <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≈</mo>\n <mn>5000</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>T</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\approx 5000\\kern0.5em \\mathrm{T} $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> under kinetic suppression. Two MMS burst-mode bow shock crossings confirm <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>k</mi>\n <mi>max</mi>\n </msub>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <mi>i</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {k}_{\\mathrm{max}}{d}_i=1 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> from FGM/FPI PySPEDAS data. A multi-environment scatter plot spanning 21 orders of magnitude in <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>n</mi>\n <mi>i</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {n}_i $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, from laser-plasma to young SNR scales, shows all points within a factor of 3 of the 1:1 line.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10700,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Plasma Physics","volume":"66 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weibel Instability in Collisionless Plasmas Across Astrophysical and Laboratory Shocks\",\"authors\":\"Vivek Shrivastav, Mani K Chettri, Hemam D. Singh, Britan Singh, Rupak Mukherjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ctpp.70147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>We present a systematic cold-fluid analysis of the purely transverse Weibel (current-filamentation) instability across four regimes: non-relativistic (NR) single-species, NR multi-species, relativistic single-species and relativistic multi-species (electron–positron and electron–proton). Beginning from the linearized fluid equations, we derive the dispersion relations in each regime and extract scaling laws for <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>γ</mi>\\n <mi>max</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {\\\\gamma}_{\\\\mathrm{max}} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n <mi>max</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>ω</mi>\\n <mi>pi</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <mi>c</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {k}_{\\\\mathrm{max}}={\\\\omega}_{pi}/c $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. The main contributions are: (i) explicit regime-transition criteria in the <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mfenced>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>v</mi>\\n <mn>0</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <mi>c</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>m</mi>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>/</mo>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>m</mi>\\n <mi>e</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n </mfenced>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\left({v}_0/c,{m}_i/{m}_e\\\\right) $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> parameter space; (ii) contour maps of relativistic suppression and mass-ratio dependence serving as diagnostic charts and (iii) an assessment of where the purely transverse mode dominates over competing instabilities. Relativistic corrections suppress <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>γ</mi>\\n <mi>max</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {\\\\gamma}_{\\\\mathrm{max}} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> by up to 40% above <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>v</mi>\\n <mn>0</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>≈</mo>\\n <mn>0.2</mn>\\n <mi>c</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {v}_0\\\\approx 0.2c $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, peaking near <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>v</mi>\\n <mn>0</mn>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>≈</mo>\\n <mn>0.9</mn>\\n <mi>c</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {v}_0\\\\approx 0.9c $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>. For the tabletop laser experiment of Bai et al., the predicted ion skin depth <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>≈</mo>\\n <mn>31.7</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mi>μm</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {d}_i\\\\approx 31.7\\\\kern0.16em \\\\upmu \\\\mathrm{m} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> agrees with the observed filament spacing to within 2%, and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>B</mi>\\n <mi>sat</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>≈</mo>\\n <mn>2.3</mn>\\n <mo>×</mo>\\n <msup>\\n <mn>10</mn>\\n <mn>4</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mi>T</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {B}_{\\\\mathrm{sat}}\\\\approx 2.3\\\\times {10}^4\\\\kern0.5em \\\\mathrm{T} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> is consistent with the measured <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>≈</mo>\\n <mn>5000</mn>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mi>T</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\approx 5000\\\\kern0.5em \\\\mathrm{T} $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> under kinetic suppression. Two MMS burst-mode bow shock crossings confirm <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>k</mi>\\n <mi>max</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>d</mi>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n </msub>\\n <mo>=</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {k}_{\\\\mathrm{max}}{d}_i=1 $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> from FGM/FPI PySPEDAS data. A multi-environment scatter plot spanning 21 orders of magnitude in <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>n</mi>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {n}_i $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, from laser-plasma to young SNR scales, shows all points within a factor of 3 of the 1:1 line.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contributions to Plasma Physics\",\"volume\":\"66 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contributions to Plasma Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctpp.70147\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Plasma Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctpp.70147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们提出了一个系统的冷流体分析纯横向维贝尔(电流丝)不稳定性在四种制度:非相对论(NR)单种,NR多种,相对论单种和相对论多种(电子-正电子和电子-质子)。从线性化的流体方程出发,我们推导了每个区域的色散关系,并提取了γ Max $$ {\gamma}_{\mathrm{max}} $$和k Max = ω PI / c的标度规律$$ {k}_{\mathrm{max}}={\omega}_{pi}/c $$。主要贡献有:(i) v 0 / c中明确的制度过渡标准;M I / M e $$ \left({v}_0/c,{m}_i/{m}_e\right) $$参数空间;(ii)作为诊断图表的相对论抑制和质量比依赖的等高线图和(iii)纯横向模式在竞争不稳定性中占主导地位的评估。相对论修正抑制γ max $$ {\gamma}_{\mathrm{max}} $$高达40% above v 0 ≈ 0.2 c $$ {v}_0\approx 0.2c $$ , peaking near v 0 ≈ 0.9 c $$ {v}_0\approx 0.9c $$ . For the tabletop laser experiment of Bai et al., the predicted ion skin depth d i ≈ 31.7 μm $$ {d}_i\approx 31.7\kern0.16em \upmu \mathrm{m} $$ agrees with the observed filament spacing to within 2%, and B sat ≈ 2.3 × 10 4 T $$ {B}_{\mathrm{sat}}\approx 2.3\times {10}^4\kern0.5em \mathrm{T} $$ is consistent with the measured ≈ 5000 T $$ \approx 5000\kern0.5em \mathrm{T} $$ under kinetic suppression. Two MMS burst-mode bow shock crossings confirm k max d i = 1 $$ {k}_{\mathrm{max}}{d}_i=1 $$ from FGM/FPI PySPEDAS data. A multi-environment scatter plot spanning 21 orders of magnitude in n i $$ {n}_i $$ , from laser-plasma to young SNR scales, shows all points within a factor of 3 of the 1:1 line.
Weibel Instability in Collisionless Plasmas Across Astrophysical and Laboratory Shocks
We present a systematic cold-fluid analysis of the purely transverse Weibel (current-filamentation) instability across four regimes: non-relativistic (NR) single-species, NR multi-species, relativistic single-species and relativistic multi-species (electron–positron and electron–proton). Beginning from the linearized fluid equations, we derive the dispersion relations in each regime and extract scaling laws for and . The main contributions are: (i) explicit regime-transition criteria in the parameter space; (ii) contour maps of relativistic suppression and mass-ratio dependence serving as diagnostic charts and (iii) an assessment of where the purely transverse mode dominates over competing instabilities. Relativistic corrections suppress by up to 40% above , peaking near . For the tabletop laser experiment of Bai et al., the predicted ion skin depth agrees with the observed filament spacing to within 2%, and is consistent with the measured under kinetic suppression. Two MMS burst-mode bow shock crossings confirm from FGM/FPI PySPEDAS data. A multi-environment scatter plot spanning 21 orders of magnitude in , from laser-plasma to young SNR scales, shows all points within a factor of 3 of the 1:1 line.