Jie Liu, Philip Skochinski, Lawrence Hughes, Yamac Dikmelik, Kevin Lascola, Gerard Wysocki
{"title":"双梳光谱与完全控制重复率和量子级联激光频率梳的偏移频率","authors":"Jie Liu, Philip Skochinski, Lawrence Hughes, Yamac Dikmelik, Kevin Lascola, Gerard Wysocki","doi":"10.1002/lpor.71993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantum cascade laser frequency combs (QCL‐FCs) are promising light sources for sensing applications, thanks to their convenient electrical pumping, chip‐scale footprint, high optical power, and relatively broadband emission in the mid‐infrared molecular fingerprint spectral region. However, under free‐running operation, QCL‐FCs exhibit frequency instabilities that limit their use as metrological‐grade sources, primarily due to insufficient control of the repetition rate ( <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>rep</jats:sub> </jats:italic> ) and the carrier envelope offset frequency ( <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>ceo</jats:sub> </jats:italic> ), which are required for unambiguous calibration of the optical frequency axis. Here, precise and independent control of the two comb parameters is demonstrated by combining radio‐frequency (rf) injection for repetition rate control with thermal tuning of the offset frequency. While the thermal tuning of free‐running combs follows the conventional comb model with <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>ceo</jats:sub> </jats:italic> < <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>rep</jats:sub> </jats:italic> , the frequency tuning behavior under rf injection is fundamentally different and requires a modified comb model with an anchor frequency ( <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>0</jats:sub> </jats:italic> ) that is directly related to <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>ceo</jats:sub> </jats:italic> but is located at much higher optical frequency within the emission bandwidth of the comb. Full frequency control of both parameters enables gapless, high‐resolution dual‐comb spectroscopy of N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O over the entire 80 cm <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> comb bandwidth, and provides pathways toward fully controlled QCL‐FC systems that require minimal external hardware and enable precision mid‐infrared spectroscopy.","PeriodicalId":204,"journal":{"name":"Laser & Photonics Reviews","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual‐Comb Spectroscopy With Fully Controlled Repetition Rate and Offset Frequency of Quantum Cascade Laser Frequency Combs\",\"authors\":\"Jie Liu, Philip Skochinski, Lawrence Hughes, Yamac Dikmelik, Kevin Lascola, Gerard Wysocki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lpor.71993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantum cascade laser frequency combs (QCL‐FCs) are promising light sources for sensing applications, thanks to their convenient electrical pumping, chip‐scale footprint, high optical power, and relatively broadband emission in the mid‐infrared molecular fingerprint spectral region. However, under free‐running operation, QCL‐FCs exhibit frequency instabilities that limit their use as metrological‐grade sources, primarily due to insufficient control of the repetition rate ( <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>rep</jats:sub> </jats:italic> ) and the carrier envelope offset frequency ( <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>ceo</jats:sub> </jats:italic> ), which are required for unambiguous calibration of the optical frequency axis. Here, precise and independent control of the two comb parameters is demonstrated by combining radio‐frequency (rf) injection for repetition rate control with thermal tuning of the offset frequency. While the thermal tuning of free‐running combs follows the conventional comb model with <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>ceo</jats:sub> </jats:italic> < <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>rep</jats:sub> </jats:italic> , the frequency tuning behavior under rf injection is fundamentally different and requires a modified comb model with an anchor frequency ( <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>0</jats:sub> </jats:italic> ) that is directly related to <jats:italic> f <jats:sub>ceo</jats:sub> </jats:italic> but is located at much higher optical frequency within the emission bandwidth of the comb. Full frequency control of both parameters enables gapless, high‐resolution dual‐comb spectroscopy of N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O over the entire 80 cm <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> comb bandwidth, and provides pathways toward fully controlled QCL‐FC systems that require minimal external hardware and enable precision mid‐infrared spectroscopy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laser & Photonics Reviews\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laser & Photonics Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.71993\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser & Photonics Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.71993","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
量子级联激光频率梳(QCL - fc)由于其方便的电泵浦、芯片级尺寸、高光功率以及在中红外分子指纹光谱区域的相对宽带发射而成为传感应用的有前途的光源。然而,在自由运行的情况下,QCL‐fc表现出频率不稳定性,这限制了它们作为计量级光源的使用,主要是由于对重复率(f rep)和载波包络偏移频率(f ceo)的控制不足,而这是光频率轴明确校准所必需的。在这里,通过将射频(rf)注入用于重复率控制与偏移频率的热调谐相结合,证明了两个梳参数的精确和独立控制。虽然自由运行的梳的热调谐遵循具有f ceo <; f rep的传统梳模型,但射频注入下的频率调谐行为是根本不同的,并且需要一个改进的梳模型,其锚定频率(f0)与f ceo直接相关,但位于梳的发射带宽内更高的光频率。这两个参数的全频率控制使n2o在整个80 cm - 1梳带宽上的无间隙、高分辨率双梳光谱成为可能,并为完全控制的QCL - FC系统提供了途径,该系统需要最少的外部硬件并实现精确的中红外光谱。
Dual‐Comb Spectroscopy With Fully Controlled Repetition Rate and Offset Frequency of Quantum Cascade Laser Frequency Combs
Quantum cascade laser frequency combs (QCL‐FCs) are promising light sources for sensing applications, thanks to their convenient electrical pumping, chip‐scale footprint, high optical power, and relatively broadband emission in the mid‐infrared molecular fingerprint spectral region. However, under free‐running operation, QCL‐FCs exhibit frequency instabilities that limit their use as metrological‐grade sources, primarily due to insufficient control of the repetition rate ( f rep ) and the carrier envelope offset frequency ( f ceo ), which are required for unambiguous calibration of the optical frequency axis. Here, precise and independent control of the two comb parameters is demonstrated by combining radio‐frequency (rf) injection for repetition rate control with thermal tuning of the offset frequency. While the thermal tuning of free‐running combs follows the conventional comb model with f ceo < f rep , the frequency tuning behavior under rf injection is fundamentally different and requires a modified comb model with an anchor frequency ( f 0 ) that is directly related to f ceo but is located at much higher optical frequency within the emission bandwidth of the comb. Full frequency control of both parameters enables gapless, high‐resolution dual‐comb spectroscopy of N 2 O over the entire 80 cm −1 comb bandwidth, and provides pathways toward fully controlled QCL‐FC systems that require minimal external hardware and enable precision mid‐infrared spectroscopy.
期刊介绍:
Laser & Photonics Reviews is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality Reviews, original Research Articles, and Perspectives in the field of photonics and optics. It covers both theoretical and experimental aspects, including recent groundbreaking research, specific advancements, and innovative applications.
As evidence of its impact and recognition, Laser & Photonics Reviews boasts a remarkable 2022 Impact Factor of 11.0, according to the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics (2023). Moreover, it holds impressive rankings in the InCites Journal Citation Reports: in 2021, it was ranked 6th out of 101 in the field of Optics, 15th out of 161 in Applied Physics, and 12th out of 69 in Condensed Matter Physics.
The journal uses the ISSN numbers 1863-8880 for print and 1863-8899 for online publications.