好的科学,差的能见度?在算法注意力经济中传播行为营养和身体活动证据。

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Stephen Barrett, Emma Ostermeier-Karim, Jennifer Gale, Kylie Wilson, Michael Wheeler, Courtney Anne West, Emily Denniss, António Palmeira
{"title":"好的科学,差的能见度?在算法注意力经济中传播行为营养和身体活动证据。","authors":"Stephen Barrett, Emma Ostermeier-Karim, Jennifer Gale, Kylie Wilson, Michael Wheeler, Courtney Anne West, Emily Denniss, António Palmeira","doi":"10.1186/s12966-026-01962-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioural nutrition and physical activity research has produced a strong and growing evidence base to inform prevention, treatment, and policy across a wide range of health outcomes. Yet the visibility of this evidence beyond academic audiences does not consistently reflect its scientific quality. Increasingly, dissemination occurs within digital environments shaped by algorithms that prioritise engagement, simplicity, novelty, and emotional salience over nuance and uncertainty. This creates a mismatch between the complexity that characterises behaviour change science and the attention-driven logics that shape what evidence becomes visible.This Comment was prompted by our involvement in developing the NESI (Network of Early Career Researchers and Students of ISBNPA) Podcast and ASPA (Asia-Pacific Society for Physical Activity) Radio, initiatives designed to disseminate credible behavioural science. Despite prioritising high-quality, peer-reviewed research, we encountered persistent challenges in achieving visibility relative to simplified or commercially framed health narratives amplified in digital spaces.We argue that visibility in digital environments is algorithmically mediated in ways that can systematically disadvantage complex, context-dependent evidence characteristic of behavioural nutrition and physical activity research. We explore the risks of equating visibility with impact, including oversimplification and erosion of trust, while contending that disengagement from contemporary communication platforms is not viable for a field committed to translation. We propose reframing dissemination as a collective responsibility of researchers, journals, and professional societies, focused on stewardship, integrity, and principled engagement. Addressing the visibility gap is essential to ensuring that credible evidence remains visible, interpretable, and influential within an attention-driven information ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":50336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13640066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Good science, poor visibility? Communicating behavioural nutrition and physical activity evidence in the algorithmic attention economy.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Barrett, Emma Ostermeier-Karim, Jennifer Gale, Kylie Wilson, Michael Wheeler, Courtney Anne West, Emily Denniss, António Palmeira\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12966-026-01962-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Behavioural nutrition and physical activity research has produced a strong and growing evidence base to inform prevention, treatment, and policy across a wide range of health outcomes. Yet the visibility of this evidence beyond academic audiences does not consistently reflect its scientific quality. Increasingly, dissemination occurs within digital environments shaped by algorithms that prioritise engagement, simplicity, novelty, and emotional salience over nuance and uncertainty. This creates a mismatch between the complexity that characterises behaviour change science and the attention-driven logics that shape what evidence becomes visible.This Comment was prompted by our involvement in developing the NESI (Network of Early Career Researchers and Students of ISBNPA) Podcast and ASPA (Asia-Pacific Society for Physical Activity) Radio, initiatives designed to disseminate credible behavioural science. Despite prioritising high-quality, peer-reviewed research, we encountered persistent challenges in achieving visibility relative to simplified or commercially framed health narratives amplified in digital spaces.We argue that visibility in digital environments is algorithmically mediated in ways that can systematically disadvantage complex, context-dependent evidence characteristic of behavioural nutrition and physical activity research. We explore the risks of equating visibility with impact, including oversimplification and erosion of trust, while contending that disengagement from contemporary communication platforms is not viable for a field committed to translation. We propose reframing dissemination as a collective responsibility of researchers, journals, and professional societies, focused on stewardship, integrity, and principled engagement. Addressing the visibility gap is essential to ensuring that credible evidence remains visible, interpretable, and influential within an attention-driven information ecosystem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13640066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-026-01962-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-026-01962-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行为营养和身体活动研究已经产生了一个强有力的、日益增长的证据基础,为各种健康结果的预防、治疗和政策提供信息。然而,这些证据在学术受众之外的可见性并不能始终反映其科学质量。越来越多的传播发生在由算法塑造的数字环境中,这些算法优先考虑参与度、简单性、新颖性和情感显著性,而不是细微差别和不确定性。这造成了行为改变科学特征的复杂性与决定证据可见性的注意力驱动逻辑之间的不匹配。这一评论是由我们参与开发NESI (ISBNPA早期职业研究人员和学生网络)播客和ASPA(亚太体育活动协会)广播引起的,这些倡议旨在传播可信的行为科学。尽管优先考虑高质量、同行评议的研究,但我们在实现相对于在数字空间中放大的简化或商业框架的健康叙述的可见性方面遇到了持续的挑战。我们认为,数字环境中的可见性是通过算法介导的,这可能会系统性地损害行为营养和身体活动研究中复杂的、依赖于情境的证据特征。我们探讨了将可见性等同于影响力的风险,包括过度简化和信任的侵蚀,同时认为对于致力于翻译的领域来说,脱离当代交流平台是不可可行的。我们建议将传播重新定义为研究人员、期刊和专业协会的集体责任,重点是管理、诚信和有原则的参与。解决可见性差距对于确保可信证据在关注驱动的信息生态系统中保持可见性、可解释性和影响力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Good science, poor visibility? Communicating behavioural nutrition and physical activity evidence in the algorithmic attention economy.

Behavioural nutrition and physical activity research has produced a strong and growing evidence base to inform prevention, treatment, and policy across a wide range of health outcomes. Yet the visibility of this evidence beyond academic audiences does not consistently reflect its scientific quality. Increasingly, dissemination occurs within digital environments shaped by algorithms that prioritise engagement, simplicity, novelty, and emotional salience over nuance and uncertainty. This creates a mismatch between the complexity that characterises behaviour change science and the attention-driven logics that shape what evidence becomes visible.This Comment was prompted by our involvement in developing the NESI (Network of Early Career Researchers and Students of ISBNPA) Podcast and ASPA (Asia-Pacific Society for Physical Activity) Radio, initiatives designed to disseminate credible behavioural science. Despite prioritising high-quality, peer-reviewed research, we encountered persistent challenges in achieving visibility relative to simplified or commercially framed health narratives amplified in digital spaces.We argue that visibility in digital environments is algorithmically mediated in ways that can systematically disadvantage complex, context-dependent evidence characteristic of behavioural nutrition and physical activity research. We explore the risks of equating visibility with impact, including oversimplification and erosion of trust, while contending that disengagement from contemporary communication platforms is not viable for a field committed to translation. We propose reframing dissemination as a collective responsibility of researchers, journals, and professional societies, focused on stewardship, integrity, and principled engagement. Addressing the visibility gap is essential to ensuring that credible evidence remains visible, interpretable, and influential within an attention-driven information ecosystem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (IJBNPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. IJBNPA is devoted to furthering the understanding of the behavioral aspects of diet and physical activity and is unique in its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, including populations, groups and individuals and its inclusion of epidemiology, and behavioral, theoretical and measurement research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书