无铅起搏器植入后心包积液的风险分层-多中心研究。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yuya Komai, Hitoshi Minamiguchi, Masayuki Ishimura, Yuichiro Sakamoto, Masahiro Nakano, Takatsugu Kajiyama, Miyo Nakano, Toshinori Chiba, Satoko Ryuzaki, Yukiko Takanashi, Yusei Nishikawa, Takashi Kanda, Mikiko Matsumura, Naoki Mori, Yuma Hamanaka, Takashige Sakio, Yuki Shibuya, Daisuke Yoshimoto, Yuko Uemura, Shoko Narumi, Yoshio Kobayashi, Yusuke Kondo
{"title":"无铅起搏器植入后心包积液的风险分层-多中心研究。","authors":"Yuya Komai, Hitoshi Minamiguchi, Masayuki Ishimura, Yuichiro Sakamoto, Masahiro Nakano, Takatsugu Kajiyama, Miyo Nakano, Toshinori Chiba, Satoko Ryuzaki, Yukiko Takanashi, Yusei Nishikawa, Takashi Kanda, Mikiko Matsumura, Naoki Mori, Yuma Hamanaka, Takashige Sakio, Yuki Shibuya, Daisuke Yoshimoto, Yuko Uemura, Shoko Narumi, Yoshio Kobayashi, Yusuke Kondo","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-25-1061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) is a known complication associated with the use of leadless pacemakers (LPMs). The risk score (RS) is a useful tool for risk stratification. This study evaluated the utility of risk stratification using the RS in Japanese patients who received the Micra LPM.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 443 patients who received Micra LPMs that were implanted at 4 institutions between August 2017 and August 2024. Patients were risk stratified using the RS into 3 groups: low risk (score ≤0), intermediate risk (score 1), and high risk (score ≥2). PPEs were observed in 9.0% (20/221), 11.7% (9/77) and 17.9% (26/145) of patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P=0.041). In multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was a significant risk factor (P=0.014) for PPE, whereas prior cardiac surgery significantly reduced the risk of PPE (P=0.023). Older age, being female, and hemodialysis were not identified as risk factors. Subsequently, we modified the RS (mRS). Using the mRS, PPEs were observed in 8.8% (27/306), 16.5% (14/85), and 26.9% (14/52) of patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The original RS is useful for PPE risk stratification after Micra LPM implantation. However, the mRS provides better risk discrimination and may therefore be a more suitable tool for use in the Japanese population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Stratification for Pericardial Effusion After Leadless Pacemaker Implantation - Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuya Komai, Hitoshi Minamiguchi, Masayuki Ishimura, Yuichiro Sakamoto, Masahiro Nakano, Takatsugu Kajiyama, Miyo Nakano, Toshinori Chiba, Satoko Ryuzaki, Yukiko Takanashi, Yusei Nishikawa, Takashi Kanda, Mikiko Matsumura, Naoki Mori, Yuma Hamanaka, Takashige Sakio, Yuki Shibuya, Daisuke Yoshimoto, Yuko Uemura, Shoko Narumi, Yoshio Kobayashi, Yusuke Kondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circj.CJ-25-1061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) is a known complication associated with the use of leadless pacemakers (LPMs). The risk score (RS) is a useful tool for risk stratification. This study evaluated the utility of risk stratification using the RS in Japanese patients who received the Micra LPM.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively enrolled 443 patients who received Micra LPMs that were implanted at 4 institutions between August 2017 and August 2024. Patients were risk stratified using the RS into 3 groups: low risk (score ≤0), intermediate risk (score 1), and high risk (score ≥2). PPEs were observed in 9.0% (20/221), 11.7% (9/77) and 17.9% (26/145) of patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P=0.041). In multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was a significant risk factor (P=0.014) for PPE, whereas prior cardiac surgery significantly reduced the risk of PPE (P=0.023). Older age, being female, and hemodialysis were not identified as risk factors. Subsequently, we modified the RS (mRS). Using the mRS, PPEs were observed in 8.8% (27/306), 16.5% (14/85), and 26.9% (14/52) of patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The original RS is useful for PPE risk stratification after Micra LPM implantation. However, the mRS provides better risk discrimination and may therefore be a more suitable tool for use in the Japanese population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-25-1061\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-25-1061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后心包积液(PPE)是已知的与使用无铅起搏器(lpm)相关的并发症。风险评分(RS)是一种有用的风险分层工具。本研究评估了在接受Micra LPM的日本患者中使用RS进行风险分层的效用。方法和结果:我们回顾性纳入443例2017年8月至2024年8月期间在4家机构接受Micra lpm植入的患者。采用RS对患者进行风险分层,分为低危(评分≤0)、中危(评分1)、高危(评分≥2)3组。低、中、高危组患者发生ppe的比例分别为9.0%(20/221)、11.7%(9/77)和17.9% (26/145)(P=0.041)。在多变量分析中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病是PPE的重要危险因素(P=0.014),而既往心脏手术可显著降低PPE的风险(P=0.023)。年龄较大、女性和血液透析不被认为是危险因素。随后,我们对RS (mRS)进行了修改。使用mRS,在低、中、高危组中分别有8.8%(27/306)、16.5%(14/85)和26.9%(14/52)的患者观察到PPE。(结论:原始RS可用于Micra LPM植入后PPE风险分层。然而,mr提供了更好的风险区分,因此可能是一个更适合在日本人群中使用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Stratification for Pericardial Effusion After Leadless Pacemaker Implantation - Multicenter Study.

Background: Postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) is a known complication associated with the use of leadless pacemakers (LPMs). The risk score (RS) is a useful tool for risk stratification. This study evaluated the utility of risk stratification using the RS in Japanese patients who received the Micra LPM.

Methods and results: We retrospectively enrolled 443 patients who received Micra LPMs that were implanted at 4 institutions between August 2017 and August 2024. Patients were risk stratified using the RS into 3 groups: low risk (score ≤0), intermediate risk (score 1), and high risk (score ≥2). PPEs were observed in 9.0% (20/221), 11.7% (9/77) and 17.9% (26/145) of patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P=0.041). In multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was a significant risk factor (P=0.014) for PPE, whereas prior cardiac surgery significantly reduced the risk of PPE (P=0.023). Older age, being female, and hemodialysis were not identified as risk factors. Subsequently, we modified the RS (mRS). Using the mRS, PPEs were observed in 8.8% (27/306), 16.5% (14/85), and 26.9% (14/52) of patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P<0.001).

Conclusions: The original RS is useful for PPE risk stratification after Micra LPM implantation. However, the mRS provides better risk discrimination and may therefore be a more suitable tool for use in the Japanese population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书