在过去60年里,随着排放强度的下降,全球水稻甲烷排放量增加了两倍。

IF 18.1 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
National Science Review Pub Date : 2026-08-29 eCollection Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1093/nsr/nwag555
Qiwen Hu, Tingting Li, Hanzhi Xie, Yao Huang, Josep G Canadell, Jingxian Li, Pete Smith, Wenping Yuan, Wen Zhang, Jianwen Zou, Jing Liu, Jiawen Zhang, Zhangcai Qin, Shilong Piao
{"title":"在过去60年里,随着排放强度的下降,全球水稻甲烷排放量增加了两倍。","authors":"Qiwen Hu, Tingting Li, Hanzhi Xie, Yao Huang, Josep G Canadell, Jingxian Li, Pete Smith, Wenping Yuan, Wen Zhang, Jianwen Zou, Jing Liu, Jiawen Zhang, Zhangcai Qin, Shilong Piao","doi":"10.1093/nsr/nwag555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rice paddies are among the largest anthropogenic sources of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), yet substantial uncertainties persist in the long-term magnitude and spatiotemporal dynamics of the emissions. Here, we show a spatially explicit global estimate of rice CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from 1961 to 2020, leveraging a new high-resolution dataset and two Tier 3 modeling approaches (process-based and machine-learning-based). We find that global emissions have more than tripled over the past six decades, reaching a record high of 38.8 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>-1</sup> in 2020 based on the mean of the two Tier 3 estimates, with both the rate and magnitude substantially higher than those of conventional emission-factor-based inventories. Traditional rice-producing regions (e.g. Asia) dominate the increase due to expanded cultivation and intensified organic inputs, while Africa emerged as a rapidly growing source. Beyond trends in absolute emissions, the CH<sub>4</sub> emission intensity (per unit of rice production) declined across 70% of the global paddy area, mainly reflecting yield-driven efficiency gains. Notably, 44% of global rice production in the 2010s occurred in countries with below-average emission intensity, with China being the largest contributor. By resolving long-term spatial heterogeneity with new data and models, this study provides a robust reassessment of the global rice methane budget and highlights pathways to reconcile food production with climate mitigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18842,"journal":{"name":"National Science Review","volume":"13 19","pages":"nwag555"},"PeriodicalIF":18.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13637625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global rice methane emissions tripled over six decades amid declining emission intensity.\",\"authors\":\"Qiwen Hu, Tingting Li, Hanzhi Xie, Yao Huang, Josep G Canadell, Jingxian Li, Pete Smith, Wenping Yuan, Wen Zhang, Jianwen Zou, Jing Liu, Jiawen Zhang, Zhangcai Qin, Shilong Piao\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nsr/nwag555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rice paddies are among the largest anthropogenic sources of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), yet substantial uncertainties persist in the long-term magnitude and spatiotemporal dynamics of the emissions. Here, we show a spatially explicit global estimate of rice CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from 1961 to 2020, leveraging a new high-resolution dataset and two Tier 3 modeling approaches (process-based and machine-learning-based). We find that global emissions have more than tripled over the past six decades, reaching a record high of 38.8 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> yr<sup>-1</sup> in 2020 based on the mean of the two Tier 3 estimates, with both the rate and magnitude substantially higher than those of conventional emission-factor-based inventories. Traditional rice-producing regions (e.g. Asia) dominate the increase due to expanded cultivation and intensified organic inputs, while Africa emerged as a rapidly growing source. Beyond trends in absolute emissions, the CH<sub>4</sub> emission intensity (per unit of rice production) declined across 70% of the global paddy area, mainly reflecting yield-driven efficiency gains. Notably, 44% of global rice production in the 2010s occurred in countries with below-average emission intensity, with China being the largest contributor. By resolving long-term spatial heterogeneity with new data and models, this study provides a robust reassessment of the global rice methane budget and highlights pathways to reconcile food production with climate mitigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Science Review\",\"volume\":\"13 19\",\"pages\":\"nwag555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13637625/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwag555\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwag555","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

稻田是甲烷(CH4)的最大人为排放源之一,但其排放的长期规模和时空动态存在很大的不确定性。本文利用新的高分辨率数据集和两种Tier 3建模方法(基于过程和基于机器学习),展示了1961年至2020年全球水稻甲烷排放的空间明确估计。我们发现,在过去的60年里,全球排放量增加了两倍多,根据两个Tier 3估算值的平均值,到2020年,全球排放量达到了38.8 Tg CH4 / 1的历史新高,其速率和幅度都大大高于传统的基于排放因子的清单。由于扩大种植和加强有机投入,传统稻米产区(如亚洲)在增加中占主导地位,而非洲则成为快速增长的来源。除了绝对排放的趋势外,全球70%的水稻面积的甲烷排放强度(每单位水稻产量)下降,主要反映了产量驱动的效率提高。值得注意的是,2010年代全球水稻产量的44%发生在排放强度低于平均水平的国家,其中中国是最大的贡献者。通过利用新数据和模型解决长期空间异质性,本研究提供了对全球水稻甲烷收支的可靠重新评估,并强调了调和粮食生产与气候减缓的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global rice methane emissions tripled over six decades amid declining emission intensity.

Rice paddies are among the largest anthropogenic sources of methane (CH4), yet substantial uncertainties persist in the long-term magnitude and spatiotemporal dynamics of the emissions. Here, we show a spatially explicit global estimate of rice CH4 emissions from 1961 to 2020, leveraging a new high-resolution dataset and two Tier 3 modeling approaches (process-based and machine-learning-based). We find that global emissions have more than tripled over the past six decades, reaching a record high of 38.8 Tg CH4 yr-1 in 2020 based on the mean of the two Tier 3 estimates, with both the rate and magnitude substantially higher than those of conventional emission-factor-based inventories. Traditional rice-producing regions (e.g. Asia) dominate the increase due to expanded cultivation and intensified organic inputs, while Africa emerged as a rapidly growing source. Beyond trends in absolute emissions, the CH4 emission intensity (per unit of rice production) declined across 70% of the global paddy area, mainly reflecting yield-driven efficiency gains. Notably, 44% of global rice production in the 2010s occurred in countries with below-average emission intensity, with China being the largest contributor. By resolving long-term spatial heterogeneity with new data and models, this study provides a robust reassessment of the global rice methane budget and highlights pathways to reconcile food production with climate mitigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
National Science Review
National Science Review MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
249
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: National Science Review (NSR; ISSN abbreviation: Natl. Sci. Rev.) is an English-language peer-reviewed multidisciplinary open-access scientific journal published by Oxford University Press under the auspices of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.According to Journal Citation Reports, its 2021 impact factor was 23.178. National Science Review publishes both review articles and perspectives as well as original research in the form of brief communications and research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书