木竹提取物的植物化学特性及生物活性研究。

IF 2.9 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Zeyneb Karakus, Cengiz Sarikurkcu, Arzuhan Sihoglu
{"title":"木竹提取物的植物化学特性及生物活性研究。","authors":"Zeyneb Karakus, Cengiz Sarikurkcu, Arzuhan Sihoglu","doi":"10.1002/cbdv.71812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study investigated how solvent choice affects the extraction of bioactive phytochemicals from Stachys pinardii. Methanol and aqueous extracts of aerial parts were obtained using ultrasound-assisted extraction and analyzed for phytochemical content, antioxidant capacity, and enzyme inhibition. The methanol extract showed higher total phenolic (52.56 mg GAEs/g) and flavonoid contents (18.19 mg REs/g) than the aqueous extract (15.62 mg GAEs/g and 8.25 mg REs/g). Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) analysis identified verbascoside and chlorogenic acid as major compounds in methanol, while aqueous extract was richer in caffeic acid and hydroxycinnamic derivatives. Despite lower phenolic content, the aqueous extract demonstrated stronger antioxidant activity across 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays, with lower IC<sub>50</sub>/EC<sub>50</sub> values. It also exhibited superior enzyme inhibitory effects, particularly against α-amylase (2.52 mg/mL) and α-glucosidase (1.58 mg/mL), although its inhibitory activity remained lower than that of the standard acarbose. Overall, solvent polarity significantly influences both phytochemical composition and biological activity. The aqueous extract, despite its lower total quantified phenolic content, shows promising multifunctional bioactivity. Further studies should focus on bioactivity-guided fractionation and mechanistic insights into individual compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":9878,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry & Biodiversity","volume":"23 10","pages":"e71812"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13641687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activity of Stachys pinardii Extracts.\",\"authors\":\"Zeyneb Karakus, Cengiz Sarikurkcu, Arzuhan Sihoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cbdv.71812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study investigated how solvent choice affects the extraction of bioactive phytochemicals from Stachys pinardii. Methanol and aqueous extracts of aerial parts were obtained using ultrasound-assisted extraction and analyzed for phytochemical content, antioxidant capacity, and enzyme inhibition. The methanol extract showed higher total phenolic (52.56 mg GAEs/g) and flavonoid contents (18.19 mg REs/g) than the aqueous extract (15.62 mg GAEs/g and 8.25 mg REs/g). Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) analysis identified verbascoside and chlorogenic acid as major compounds in methanol, while aqueous extract was richer in caffeic acid and hydroxycinnamic derivatives. Despite lower phenolic content, the aqueous extract demonstrated stronger antioxidant activity across 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays, with lower IC<sub>50</sub>/EC<sub>50</sub> values. It also exhibited superior enzyme inhibitory effects, particularly against α-amylase (2.52 mg/mL) and α-glucosidase (1.58 mg/mL), although its inhibitory activity remained lower than that of the standard acarbose. Overall, solvent polarity significantly influences both phytochemical composition and biological activity. The aqueous extract, despite its lower total quantified phenolic content, shows promising multifunctional bioactivity. Further studies should focus on bioactivity-guided fractionation and mechanistic insights into individual compounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry & Biodiversity\",\"volume\":\"23 10\",\"pages\":\"e71812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13641687/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry & Biodiversity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.71812\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry & Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.71812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了溶剂选择对桃红植物活性物质提取的影响。采用超声辅助提取法提取空气部位的甲醇和水提物,分析其植物化学成分、抗氧化能力和酶抑制能力。甲醇提取物的总酚含量(52.56 mg GAEs/g)和类黄酮含量(18.19 mg REs/g)高于水提物(15.62 mg GAEs/g和8.25 mg REs/g)。液相色谱-电喷雾电离-串联质谱(LC-ESI-MS/MS)分析鉴定甲醇中毛蕊花苷和绿原酸为主要化合物,而水提物中含有较多的咖啡酸和羟基肉桂酸衍生物。尽管酚类物质含量较低,但水提物在2,2-二苯基-1-吡啶肼(DPPH)、2,2'-氮唑-(3-乙基苯并噻唑-6-磺酸)(ABTS)、铜离子还原抗氧化能力(CUPRAC)和铁离子还原抗氧化能力(FRAP)试验中表现出较强的抗氧化活性,IC50/EC50值较低。对α-淀粉酶(2.52 mg/mL)和α-葡萄糖苷酶(1.58 mg/mL)的抑制效果较好,但其抑制活性仍低于标准阿卡波糖。总的来说,溶剂极性显著影响植物化学成分和生物活性。水提物,尽管其总定量酚含量较低,但显示出良好的多功能生物活性。进一步的研究应集中在生物活性引导的分离和对单个化合物的机制见解上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phytochemical Characterization and Biological Activity of Stachys pinardii Extracts.

The study investigated how solvent choice affects the extraction of bioactive phytochemicals from Stachys pinardii. Methanol and aqueous extracts of aerial parts were obtained using ultrasound-assisted extraction and analyzed for phytochemical content, antioxidant capacity, and enzyme inhibition. The methanol extract showed higher total phenolic (52.56 mg GAEs/g) and flavonoid contents (18.19 mg REs/g) than the aqueous extract (15.62 mg GAEs/g and 8.25 mg REs/g). Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) analysis identified verbascoside and chlorogenic acid as major compounds in methanol, while aqueous extract was richer in caffeic acid and hydroxycinnamic derivatives. Despite lower phenolic content, the aqueous extract demonstrated stronger antioxidant activity across 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2'-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays, with lower IC50/EC50 values. It also exhibited superior enzyme inhibitory effects, particularly against α-amylase (2.52 mg/mL) and α-glucosidase (1.58 mg/mL), although its inhibitory activity remained lower than that of the standard acarbose. Overall, solvent polarity significantly influences both phytochemical composition and biological activity. The aqueous extract, despite its lower total quantified phenolic content, shows promising multifunctional bioactivity. Further studies should focus on bioactivity-guided fractionation and mechanistic insights into individual compounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemistry & Biodiversity
Chemistry & Biodiversity 环境科学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
475
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Chemistry & Biodiversity serves as a high-quality publishing forum covering a wide range of biorelevant topics for a truly international audience. This journal publishes both field-specific and interdisciplinary contributions on all aspects of biologically relevant chemistry research in the form of full-length original papers, short communications, invited reviews, and commentaries. It covers all research fields straddling the border between the chemical and biological sciences, with the ultimate goal of broadening our understanding of how nature works at a molecular level. Since 2017, Chemistry & Biodiversity is published in an online-only format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书