不仅仅是感觉压力:青少年日常生活中的应对、情绪和身体功能。

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Tian Lan, Mingjun Xie, Yuanyuan Li, Meijing Chen, Danhua Lin
{"title":"不仅仅是感觉压力:青少年日常生活中的应对、情绪和身体功能。","authors":"Tian Lan, Mingjun Xie, Yuanyuan Li, Meijing Chen, Danhua Lin","doi":"10.1111/aphw.70235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Daily stress is a pervasive experience during adolescence and is linked to emotional and physical health, yet few studies have examined multiple coping strategies in relation to different domains of emotional and somatic functioning within the same daily context. This study used a daily diary approach to examine whether coping strategies moderate associations between daily stress and adolescents' positive affect, negative affect, and somatic symptoms. Data were drawn from a 7-day daily diary study of 208 Chinese adolescents. Participants reported stress, affect, somatic symptoms, and coping strategies. Multilevel models disaggregated within-person and between-person associations and tested moderation effects. At the within-person level, higher-than-usual daily stress was associated with lower positive affect and higher negative affect on the same day. Emotion-focused coping amplified these associations, whereas affiliation-focused coping attenuated them; task-focused coping was nonsignificant. At the between-person level, higher average stress was related to poorer emotional and somatic functioning. Emotion-focused coping amplified these associations, and task-focused coping strengthened the association between stress and lower positive affect. Lagged associations were generally weaker. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing within-person processes from between-person differences in understanding adolescents' responses to daily stress. Coping strategies play distinct roles in shaping emotional and physical functioning in daily life and may represent targets for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":"18 5","pages":"e70235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not just feeling stressed: Coping, emotional, and somatic functioning in adolescents' daily lives.\",\"authors\":\"Tian Lan, Mingjun Xie, Yuanyuan Li, Meijing Chen, Danhua Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aphw.70235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Daily stress is a pervasive experience during adolescence and is linked to emotional and physical health, yet few studies have examined multiple coping strategies in relation to different domains of emotional and somatic functioning within the same daily context. This study used a daily diary approach to examine whether coping strategies moderate associations between daily stress and adolescents' positive affect, negative affect, and somatic symptoms. Data were drawn from a 7-day daily diary study of 208 Chinese adolescents. Participants reported stress, affect, somatic symptoms, and coping strategies. Multilevel models disaggregated within-person and between-person associations and tested moderation effects. At the within-person level, higher-than-usual daily stress was associated with lower positive affect and higher negative affect on the same day. Emotion-focused coping amplified these associations, whereas affiliation-focused coping attenuated them; task-focused coping was nonsignificant. At the between-person level, higher average stress was related to poorer emotional and somatic functioning. Emotion-focused coping amplified these associations, and task-focused coping strengthened the association between stress and lower positive affect. Lagged associations were generally weaker. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing within-person processes from between-person differences in understanding adolescents' responses to daily stress. Coping strategies play distinct roles in shaping emotional and physical functioning in daily life and may represent targets for intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied psychology. Health and well-being\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"e70235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied psychology. Health and well-being\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70235\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

日常压力是青春期普遍存在的经历,与情绪和身体健康有关,但很少有研究调查在相同的日常环境中,与情绪和身体功能的不同领域相关的多种应对策略。本研究采用每日日记的方法来检验应对策略是否调节日常压力与青少年的积极影响、消极影响和躯体症状之间的关联。数据来自208名中国青少年的7天每日日记研究。参与者报告了压力、影响、躯体症状和应对策略。多层次模型分解了人与人之间和人与人之间的关联,并测试了调节效应。在个人层面上,高于平时的日常压力与当天较低的积极影响和较高的消极影响相关。以情绪为中心的应对放大了这些关联,而以隶属关系为中心的应对则减弱了它们;以任务为中心的应对不显著。在人与人之间的水平上,较高的平均压力与较差的情绪和身体功能有关。以情绪为中心的应对放大了这些联系,而以任务为中心的应对加强了压力与较低积极情绪之间的联系。滞后关联通常较弱。这些发现强调了在理解青少年对日常压力的反应时,区分个人内部过程和个人之间差异的重要性。应对策略在塑造日常生活中的情绪和身体功能方面发挥着独特的作用,可能是干预的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Not just feeling stressed: Coping, emotional, and somatic functioning in adolescents' daily lives.

Daily stress is a pervasive experience during adolescence and is linked to emotional and physical health, yet few studies have examined multiple coping strategies in relation to different domains of emotional and somatic functioning within the same daily context. This study used a daily diary approach to examine whether coping strategies moderate associations between daily stress and adolescents' positive affect, negative affect, and somatic symptoms. Data were drawn from a 7-day daily diary study of 208 Chinese adolescents. Participants reported stress, affect, somatic symptoms, and coping strategies. Multilevel models disaggregated within-person and between-person associations and tested moderation effects. At the within-person level, higher-than-usual daily stress was associated with lower positive affect and higher negative affect on the same day. Emotion-focused coping amplified these associations, whereas affiliation-focused coping attenuated them; task-focused coping was nonsignificant. At the between-person level, higher average stress was related to poorer emotional and somatic functioning. Emotion-focused coping amplified these associations, and task-focused coping strengthened the association between stress and lower positive affect. Lagged associations were generally weaker. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing within-person processes from between-person differences in understanding adolescents' responses to daily stress. Coping strategies play distinct roles in shaping emotional and physical functioning in daily life and may represent targets for intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书