三稳健性面板估计

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Journal of Applied Econometrics Pub Date : 2026-10-02 Epub Date: 2026-05-27 DOI:10.1002/jae.70061
Susan Athey, Guido Imbens, Zhaonan Qu, Davide Viviano
{"title":"三稳健性面板估计","authors":"Susan Athey,&nbsp;Guido Imbens,&nbsp;Zhaonan Qu,&nbsp;Davide Viviano","doi":"10.1002/jae.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper studies estimation of causal effects in a panel data setting. We introduce a new estimator, the Triply Robust Panel (TROP) estimator, that combines <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>i</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ (i) $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> a flexible model for the potential outcomes based on a low-rank factor structure on top of a two-way-fixed effect specification, with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>i</mi>\n <mi>i</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ (ii) $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> unit weights intended to upweight units similar to the treated units and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>i</mi>\n <mi>i</mi>\n <mi>i</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ (iii) $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> time weights intended to upweight time periods close to the treated time periods. We study the performance of the estimator in a set of simulations designed to closely match several commonly studied real data sets. We find that there is substantial variation in the performance of the estimators across the settings considered. The proposed estimator outperforms Two-Way-Fixed-Effect (TWFE) or Difference-In-Differences (DID), Synthetic Control (SC), Matrix Completion (MC) and Synthetic-Difference-In-Differences (SDID) estimators. We investigate what features of the data generating process lead to this superior performance and assess the relative importance of the three components of the proposed estimator. We have two recommendations. Our preferred strategy is that researchers use simulations closely matched to the data they are interested in, along the lines discussed in this paper, to investigate which estimators work well in their particular setting. A simpler approach is to use more robust estimators such as SDID or the new TROP estimator, which we find to substantially outperform TWFE/DID estimators in many empirically relevant settings.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","volume":"41 6","pages":"745-760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triply Robust Panel Estimators\",\"authors\":\"Susan Athey,&nbsp;Guido Imbens,&nbsp;Zhaonan Qu,&nbsp;Davide Viviano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jae.70061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This paper studies estimation of causal effects in a panel data setting. We introduce a new estimator, the Triply Robust Panel (TROP) estimator, that combines <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ (i) $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> a flexible model for the potential outcomes based on a low-rank factor structure on top of a two-way-fixed effect specification, with <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ (ii) $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> unit weights intended to upweight units similar to the treated units and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n <mi>i</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ (iii) $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> time weights intended to upweight time periods close to the treated time periods. We study the performance of the estimator in a set of simulations designed to closely match several commonly studied real data sets. We find that there is substantial variation in the performance of the estimators across the settings considered. The proposed estimator outperforms Two-Way-Fixed-Effect (TWFE) or Difference-In-Differences (DID), Synthetic Control (SC), Matrix Completion (MC) and Synthetic-Difference-In-Differences (SDID) estimators. We investigate what features of the data generating process lead to this superior performance and assess the relative importance of the three components of the proposed estimator. We have two recommendations. Our preferred strategy is that researchers use simulations closely matched to the data they are interested in, along the lines discussed in this paper, to investigate which estimators work well in their particular setting. A simpler approach is to use more robust estimators such as SDID or the new TROP estimator, which we find to substantially outperform TWFE/DID estimators in many empirically relevant settings.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"41 6\",\"pages\":\"745-760\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jae.70061\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jae.70061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了面板数据设置中因果效应的估计。我们引入了一个新的估计器,三重稳健面板(TROP)估计器,它结合了(i) $$ (i) $$基于双向固定效应规范之上的低秩因子结构的潜在结果的灵活模型;(I I) $$ (ii) $$单位权重旨在增加与处理单位相似的单位权重,(I I I) $$ (iii) $$时间权重旨在增加接近处理时间的时间段权重周期。我们在一组模拟中研究了估计器的性能,这些模拟被设计成与几个常用的真实数据集紧密匹配。我们发现,在考虑的设置中,估计器的性能有很大的变化。该估计器优于双向固定效应(TWFE)或差中差(DID)、综合控制(SC)、矩阵补全(MC)和综合差中差(SDID)估计器。我们研究了数据生成过程的哪些特征导致了这种优越的性能,并评估了所提出的估计器的三个组成部分的相对重要性。我们有两个建议。我们的首选策略是研究人员使用与他们感兴趣的数据密切匹配的模拟,沿着本文中讨论的路线,调查哪些估计器在他们的特定设置中工作得很好。一种更简单的方法是使用更健壮的估计器,如SDID或新的TROP估计器,我们发现在许多经验相关的设置中,它们实质上优于TWFE/DID估计器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Triply Robust Panel Estimators

This paper studies estimation of causal effects in a panel data setting. We introduce a new estimator, the Triply Robust Panel (TROP) estimator, that combines ( i ) $$ (i) $$ a flexible model for the potential outcomes based on a low-rank factor structure on top of a two-way-fixed effect specification, with ( i i ) $$ (ii) $$ unit weights intended to upweight units similar to the treated units and ( i i i ) $$ (iii) $$ time weights intended to upweight time periods close to the treated time periods. We study the performance of the estimator in a set of simulations designed to closely match several commonly studied real data sets. We find that there is substantial variation in the performance of the estimators across the settings considered. The proposed estimator outperforms Two-Way-Fixed-Effect (TWFE) or Difference-In-Differences (DID), Synthetic Control (SC), Matrix Completion (MC) and Synthetic-Difference-In-Differences (SDID) estimators. We investigate what features of the data generating process lead to this superior performance and assess the relative importance of the three components of the proposed estimator. We have two recommendations. Our preferred strategy is that researchers use simulations closely matched to the data they are interested in, along the lines discussed in this paper, to investigate which estimators work well in their particular setting. A simpler approach is to use more robust estimators such as SDID or the new TROP estimator, which we find to substantially outperform TWFE/DID estimators in many empirically relevant settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Econometrics is an international journal published bi-monthly, plus 1 additional issue (total 7 issues). It aims to publish articles of high quality dealing with the application of existing as well as new econometric techniques to a wide variety of problems in economics and related subjects, covering topics in measurement, estimation, testing, forecasting, and policy analysis. The emphasis is on the careful and rigorous application of econometric techniques and the appropriate interpretation of the results. The economic content of the articles is stressed. A special feature of the Journal is its emphasis on the replicability of results by other researchers. To achieve this aim, authors are expected to make available a complete set of the data used as well as any specialised computer programs employed through a readily accessible medium, preferably in a machine-readable form. The use of microcomputers in applied research and transferability of data is emphasised. The Journal also features occasional sections of short papers re-evaluating previously published papers. The intention of the Journal of Applied Econometrics is to provide an outlet for innovative, quantitative research in economics which cuts across areas of specialisation, involves transferable techniques, and is easily replicable by other researchers. Contributions that introduce statistical methods that are applicable to a variety of economic problems are actively encouraged. The Journal also aims to publish review and survey articles that make recent developments in the field of theoretical and applied econometrics more readily accessible to applied economists in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书