{"title":"精英高等教育中的酷儿制度里程碑:普林斯顿大学和男女同校的酷儿视角(1960-1980)","authors":"Ezelle Sanford III, Judy Jarvis, Eric Anglero","doi":"10.1111/1468-0424.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A new archive of oral history interviews from LGBTQIA-identified alumni, faculty and staff reveals the complex ways that queer and transgender students understood, experienced and remembered the long transition from single-sex to coeducation at Princeton University. Engaging with this oral history collection, as well as literatures on single-sex higher education, and queer and trans activism, this institutional case study ‘troubles’ Princeton's history of coeducation and recounts the concurrent history of queer activism at the university. Such a perspective reveals that (1) some transgender students took advantage of the institution's single-sex education prior to the inclusion of cisgender women, although they could not outwardly express their true gender as students; (2) Princeton's admission of cisgender women opened, at least in part, spaces for queer students to form community, become a visible constituency, and later demand recognition and protection and (3) Princeton's male-dominant ‘masculine tradition’ persisted, even in newly formed queer spaces<sup>1</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":46382,"journal":{"name":"Gender and History","volume":"38 3","pages":"921-933"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-0424.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Queering Institutional Milestones in Elite Higher Education: Queer Perspectives on Princeton University and Coeducation (1960–1980)\",\"authors\":\"Ezelle Sanford III, Judy Jarvis, Eric Anglero\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-0424.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A new archive of oral history interviews from LGBTQIA-identified alumni, faculty and staff reveals the complex ways that queer and transgender students understood, experienced and remembered the long transition from single-sex to coeducation at Princeton University. Engaging with this oral history collection, as well as literatures on single-sex higher education, and queer and trans activism, this institutional case study ‘troubles’ Princeton's history of coeducation and recounts the concurrent history of queer activism at the university. Such a perspective reveals that (1) some transgender students took advantage of the institution's single-sex education prior to the inclusion of cisgender women, although they could not outwardly express their true gender as students; (2) Princeton's admission of cisgender women opened, at least in part, spaces for queer students to form community, become a visible constituency, and later demand recognition and protection and (3) Princeton's male-dominant ‘masculine tradition’ persisted, even in newly formed queer spaces<sup>1</sup>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender and History\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"921-933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-0424.70006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender and History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0424.70006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and History","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0424.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Queering Institutional Milestones in Elite Higher Education: Queer Perspectives on Princeton University and Coeducation (1960–1980)
A new archive of oral history interviews from LGBTQIA-identified alumni, faculty and staff reveals the complex ways that queer and transgender students understood, experienced and remembered the long transition from single-sex to coeducation at Princeton University. Engaging with this oral history collection, as well as literatures on single-sex higher education, and queer and trans activism, this institutional case study ‘troubles’ Princeton's history of coeducation and recounts the concurrent history of queer activism at the university. Such a perspective reveals that (1) some transgender students took advantage of the institution's single-sex education prior to the inclusion of cisgender women, although they could not outwardly express their true gender as students; (2) Princeton's admission of cisgender women opened, at least in part, spaces for queer students to form community, become a visible constituency, and later demand recognition and protection and (3) Princeton's male-dominant ‘masculine tradition’ persisted, even in newly formed queer spaces1.
期刊介绍:
Gender & History is now established as the major international journal for research and writing on the history of femininity and masculinity and of gender relations. Spanning epochs and continents, Gender & History examines changing conceptions of gender, and maps the dialogue between femininities, masculinities and their historical contexts. The journal publishes rigorous and readable articles both on particular episodes in gender history and on broader methodological questions which have ramifications for the discipline as a whole.