破坏儿童性剥削:一个警世故事

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Child & Family Social Work Pub Date : 2026-10-06 Epub Date: 2026-01-08 DOI:10.1111/cfs.70120
Gemma McKibbin, Cathy Humphreys, Luz Viviana Sastre Gomez, Genevieve Bloxsom, Sophie Dixon
{"title":"破坏儿童性剥削:一个警世故事","authors":"Gemma McKibbin,&nbsp;Cathy Humphreys,&nbsp;Luz Viviana Sastre Gomez,&nbsp;Genevieve Bloxsom,&nbsp;Sophie Dixon","doi":"10.1111/cfs.70120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Child sexual exploitation (CSE) is a problem growing exponentially, especially for children living in residential out-of-home care, a disproportionate number who are Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. Practitioners supporting sexually exploited children are ideally placed to provide insight into promising ways to exit the abuse. This study aimed to develop a model for exiting children living in residential care from CSE, guided by the research question: <i>How does practice experience inform the development of a model to exit children from CSE?</i> Individual interviews with 24 workers from five community service organizations, and five child protection workers, along with two additional focus groups with residential care staff were undertaken in 2024. The inductive analysis revealed a ‘constructed composite’: a CSE Exit model. There are five components: (1) child at the centre, (2) therapeutic work with the child, (3) soft disruption, (4) hard disruption and (5) exit from sexual exploitation. The model is framed by four enablers: authorizing environment, information sharing and multiagency work, coordination by expert CSE practitioners and knowledgeable workforce. A ‘cautionary tale’ emerged about the importance of doing therapeutic, culturally responsive work with a child before attempting hard disruption, otherwise further distress and trauma may result.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10025,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Social Work","volume":"31 4","pages":"2109-2121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disrupting Child Sexual Exploitation: A Cautionary Tale\",\"authors\":\"Gemma McKibbin,&nbsp;Cathy Humphreys,&nbsp;Luz Viviana Sastre Gomez,&nbsp;Genevieve Bloxsom,&nbsp;Sophie Dixon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cfs.70120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Child sexual exploitation (CSE) is a problem growing exponentially, especially for children living in residential out-of-home care, a disproportionate number who are Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. Practitioners supporting sexually exploited children are ideally placed to provide insight into promising ways to exit the abuse. This study aimed to develop a model for exiting children living in residential care from CSE, guided by the research question: <i>How does practice experience inform the development of a model to exit children from CSE?</i> Individual interviews with 24 workers from five community service organizations, and five child protection workers, along with two additional focus groups with residential care staff were undertaken in 2024. The inductive analysis revealed a ‘constructed composite’: a CSE Exit model. There are five components: (1) child at the centre, (2) therapeutic work with the child, (3) soft disruption, (4) hard disruption and (5) exit from sexual exploitation. The model is framed by four enablers: authorizing environment, information sharing and multiagency work, coordination by expert CSE practitioners and knowledgeable workforce. A ‘cautionary tale’ emerged about the importance of doing therapeutic, culturally responsive work with a child before attempting hard disruption, otherwise further distress and trauma may result.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"2109-2121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Family Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.70120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.70120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童性剥削(CSE)是一个呈指数增长的问题,特别是对于住在住家外照料的儿童,其中不成比例的儿童是土著和/或托雷斯海峡岛民。支持遭受性剥削的儿童的从业人员最适合为摆脱虐待提供有希望的方法。本研究的目的是在研究问题“实践经验如何为退出CSE儿童模型的开发提供信息”的指导下,为退出CSE儿童开发一个模型。2024年,对来自5个社区服务组织的24名工作人员和5名儿童保护工作者进行了个别访谈,并对另外2个寄宿护理人员进行了焦点小组访谈。归纳分析揭示了一个“构建的组合”:一个CSE退出模型。有五个组成部分:(1)以儿童为中心,(2)与儿童的治疗工作,(3)软干扰,(4)硬干扰和(5)退出性剥削。该模型由四个促成因素构成:授权环境、信息共享和多机构工作、专家CSE实践者和知识渊博的工作人员的协调。一个“警世故事”出现了,它告诉我们,在试图强行破坏之前,与孩子一起做治疗性的、与文化相关的工作是很重要的,否则可能会导致进一步的痛苦和创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disrupting Child Sexual Exploitation: A Cautionary Tale

Child sexual exploitation (CSE) is a problem growing exponentially, especially for children living in residential out-of-home care, a disproportionate number who are Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. Practitioners supporting sexually exploited children are ideally placed to provide insight into promising ways to exit the abuse. This study aimed to develop a model for exiting children living in residential care from CSE, guided by the research question: How does practice experience inform the development of a model to exit children from CSE? Individual interviews with 24 workers from five community service organizations, and five child protection workers, along with two additional focus groups with residential care staff were undertaken in 2024. The inductive analysis revealed a ‘constructed composite’: a CSE Exit model. There are five components: (1) child at the centre, (2) therapeutic work with the child, (3) soft disruption, (4) hard disruption and (5) exit from sexual exploitation. The model is framed by four enablers: authorizing environment, information sharing and multiagency work, coordination by expert CSE practitioners and knowledgeable workforce. A ‘cautionary tale’ emerged about the importance of doing therapeutic, culturally responsive work with a child before attempting hard disruption, otherwise further distress and trauma may result.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Child and Family Social Work provides a forum where researchers, practitioners, policy-makers and managers in the field of child and family social work exchange knowledge, increase understanding and develop notions of good practice. In its promotion of research and practice, which is both disciplined and articulate, the Journal is dedicated to advancing the wellbeing and welfare of children and their families throughout the world. Child and Family Social Work publishes original and distinguished contributions on matters of research, theory, policy and practice in the field of social work with children and their families. The Journal gives international definition to the discipline and practice of child and family social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书