正交屈曲约束支撑框架组合式钢结构双向振动台试验

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2027-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-06 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.123910
Emily Williamson, Michael Morano, Chris P. Pantelides, Tara Hutchinson, Brandt Saxey
{"title":"正交屈曲约束支撑框架组合式钢结构双向振动台试验","authors":"Emily Williamson,&nbsp;Michael Morano,&nbsp;Chris P. Pantelides,&nbsp;Tara Hutchinson,&nbsp;Brandt Saxey","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.123910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The experimental performance of a full-scale three-story steel building, referred to as the Modular Test Bed Building (MTB<sup>2</sup>), subjected to earthquake motions while configured with orthogonal Buckling Restrained Braced Frames (BRBFs) is presented. The MTB<sup>2</sup> was designed and built such that select components would remain elastic to facilitate their reuse in future shake table tests of structural and non-structural components and systems. In the configuration presented herein, BRBFs are used as the lateral force resisting system (LFRS) in both orthogonal directions. The building was subjected to multiple earthquake input motions of increasing intensity under uni-directional (1D) and bi-directional (2D) excitations. Robust response of the BRBFs was observed, controlling the transient maximum drift ratio to 0.75% and the residual drift ratio to a maximum of 0.05%. The maximum BRB tensile strain reached 4.8 times the yield strain. Assessment of BRB fatigue performance showed minimal damage and was consistent with visual observations. This study reinforced the AISC 341–22 requirement that corner columns, which are part of intersecting orthogonal BRBFs, should be designed considering 100% of the seismic force in both directions. In general, based on the experimental results from three different input ground motions, this requirement may be conservative depending on the particular motion. No damage to columns, beams, connections or gusset plates was observed, which demonstrates that similarly designed buildings with intersecting orthogonal BRBFs are expected to be seismically resilient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"370 ","pages":"Article 123910"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2027-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bi-directional shake table tests of a modular steel building with orthogonal buckling restrained braced frames\",\"authors\":\"Emily Williamson,&nbsp;Michael Morano,&nbsp;Chris P. Pantelides,&nbsp;Tara Hutchinson,&nbsp;Brandt Saxey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.123910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The experimental performance of a full-scale three-story steel building, referred to as the Modular Test Bed Building (MTB<sup>2</sup>), subjected to earthquake motions while configured with orthogonal Buckling Restrained Braced Frames (BRBFs) is presented. The MTB<sup>2</sup> was designed and built such that select components would remain elastic to facilitate their reuse in future shake table tests of structural and non-structural components and systems. In the configuration presented herein, BRBFs are used as the lateral force resisting system (LFRS) in both orthogonal directions. The building was subjected to multiple earthquake input motions of increasing intensity under uni-directional (1D) and bi-directional (2D) excitations. Robust response of the BRBFs was observed, controlling the transient maximum drift ratio to 0.75% and the residual drift ratio to a maximum of 0.05%. The maximum BRB tensile strain reached 4.8 times the yield strain. Assessment of BRB fatigue performance showed minimal damage and was consistent with visual observations. This study reinforced the AISC 341–22 requirement that corner columns, which are part of intersecting orthogonal BRBFs, should be designed considering 100% of the seismic force in both directions. In general, based on the experimental results from three different input ground motions, this requirement may be conservative depending on the particular motion. No damage to columns, beams, connections or gusset plates was observed, which demonstrates that similarly designed buildings with intersecting orthogonal BRBFs are expected to be seismically resilient.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"370 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123910\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2027-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626018249\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029626018249","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了采用正交屈曲约束支撑框架(BRBFs)的全尺寸三层钢结构建筑模块化试验台(MTB2)在地震作用下的试验性能。MTB2的设计和制造使选定的部件保持弹性,以便在今后对结构和非结构部件和系统进行振动台试验时重用。在本文提出的结构中,brbf在两个正交方向上都用作抗侧力系统(LFRS)。该建筑在单向(1D)和双向(2D)激励下承受了多次强度不断增加的地震输入运动。观察到brbf的鲁棒响应,将瞬态最大漂移比控制在0.75%,剩余漂移比控制在最大0.05%。BRB的最大拉伸应变达到屈服应变的4.8倍。BRB疲劳性能评估显示最小的损伤,并与视觉观察一致。本研究加强了AISC 341-22的要求,角柱作为相交正交brbf的一部分,设计时应考虑100%的双向地震力。一般来说,根据三种不同输入地震动的实验结果,这一要求可能是保守的,取决于特定的震动。没有观察到柱、梁、连接处或扣板损坏,这表明类似设计的正交brbf相交的建筑物有望具有抗震能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bi-directional shake table tests of a modular steel building with orthogonal buckling restrained braced frames
The experimental performance of a full-scale three-story steel building, referred to as the Modular Test Bed Building (MTB2), subjected to earthquake motions while configured with orthogonal Buckling Restrained Braced Frames (BRBFs) is presented. The MTB2 was designed and built such that select components would remain elastic to facilitate their reuse in future shake table tests of structural and non-structural components and systems. In the configuration presented herein, BRBFs are used as the lateral force resisting system (LFRS) in both orthogonal directions. The building was subjected to multiple earthquake input motions of increasing intensity under uni-directional (1D) and bi-directional (2D) excitations. Robust response of the BRBFs was observed, controlling the transient maximum drift ratio to 0.75% and the residual drift ratio to a maximum of 0.05%. The maximum BRB tensile strain reached 4.8 times the yield strain. Assessment of BRB fatigue performance showed minimal damage and was consistent with visual observations. This study reinforced the AISC 341–22 requirement that corner columns, which are part of intersecting orthogonal BRBFs, should be designed considering 100% of the seismic force in both directions. In general, based on the experimental results from three different input ground motions, this requirement may be conservative depending on the particular motion. No damage to columns, beams, connections or gusset plates was observed, which demonstrates that similarly designed buildings with intersecting orthogonal BRBFs are expected to be seismically resilient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书