表构成和任务需求对不平衡三语者语际同形词加工的影响

IF 2.4 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Ihor Borisovitch Biloushchenko, Ton Dijkstra, Dominiek Sandra
{"title":"表构成和任务需求对不平衡三语者语际同形词加工的影响","authors":"Ihor Borisovitch Biloushchenko, Ton Dijkstra, Dominiek Sandra","doi":"10.1017/s1366728926101916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated how list composition (pure vs. mixed) and task demands (lexical decision vs. go/no-go) affect interlingual homograph (IH) processing in Dutch–English–French unbalanced trilinguals. Across six experiments with English (L2) as the target language, participants responded to identical Dutch-English homographs presented in three types of stimulus lists: a pure English (L2) list, a mixed Dutch–English (L1–L2) list, or a mixed English–French L2–L3 list. Linear mixed-effects analyses on response times and error rates revealed inhibition effects for IH, stronger in mixed lists and even stronger in go/no-go tasks. The results support the predictions of the BIA+ and Multilink+ models, highlighting the roles of list composition, language dominance, and task schema in modulating cross-language lexical activation effects. We argue that response mappings play a crucial role in shaping inhibition during multilingual lexical access.","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of list composition and task demands on interlingual homograph processing in unbalanced trilinguals\",\"authors\":\"Ihor Borisovitch Biloushchenko, Ton Dijkstra, Dominiek Sandra\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1366728926101916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigated how list composition (pure vs. mixed) and task demands (lexical decision vs. go/no-go) affect interlingual homograph (IH) processing in Dutch–English–French unbalanced trilinguals. Across six experiments with English (L2) as the target language, participants responded to identical Dutch-English homographs presented in three types of stimulus lists: a pure English (L2) list, a mixed Dutch–English (L1–L2) list, or a mixed English–French L2–L3 list. Linear mixed-effects analyses on response times and error rates revealed inhibition effects for IH, stronger in mixed lists and even stronger in go/no-go tasks. The results support the predictions of the BIA+ and Multilink+ models, highlighting the roles of list composition, language dominance, and task schema in modulating cross-language lexical activation effects. We argue that response mappings play a crucial role in shaping inhibition during multilingual lexical access.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728926101916\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728926101916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了表构成(纯表与混合表)和任务要求(词汇决策与去/不去表)对荷英法三语不平衡者语际同形词加工的影响。在以英语(L2)为目标语言的六个实验中,参与者对三种类型的刺激列表中呈现的相同的荷兰语-英语同音异义词作出反应:纯英语(L2)列表、荷兰语-英语混合(L1-L2)列表或英语-法语混合(L2 - l3)列表。对反应时间和错误率的线性混合效应分析表明,IH的抑制效应在混合列表中更强,在go/no-go任务中更强。研究结果支持了BIA+和Multilink+模型的预测,强调了列表构成、语言优势和任务图式在调节跨语言词汇激活效应中的作用。我们认为,在多语言词汇获取过程中,反应映射在形成抑制中起着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of list composition and task demands on interlingual homograph processing in unbalanced trilinguals
We investigated how list composition (pure vs. mixed) and task demands (lexical decision vs. go/no-go) affect interlingual homograph (IH) processing in Dutch–English–French unbalanced trilinguals. Across six experiments with English (L2) as the target language, participants responded to identical Dutch-English homographs presented in three types of stimulus lists: a pure English (L2) list, a mixed Dutch–English (L1–L2) list, or a mixed English–French L2–L3 list. Linear mixed-effects analyses on response times and error rates revealed inhibition effects for IH, stronger in mixed lists and even stronger in go/no-go tasks. The results support the predictions of the BIA+ and Multilink+ models, highlighting the roles of list composition, language dominance, and task schema in modulating cross-language lexical activation effects. We argue that response mappings play a crucial role in shaping inhibition during multilingual lexical access.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书