单细胞ICP-MS:整个工作流程中分析偏差的回顾

IF 6.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Ketolly N.S. Leal, Alan J. Stewart, Carlos H.I. Ramos, Marco A.Z. Arruda
{"title":"单细胞ICP-MS:整个工作流程中分析偏差的回顾","authors":"Ketolly N.S. Leal, Alan J. Stewart, Carlos H.I. Ramos, Marco A.Z. Arruda","doi":"10.1016/j.aca.2026.346325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single-cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS) has become an important tool for measuring elemental content in individual cells and revealing heterogeneity that is lost in bulk analysis. However, the reliability of these measurements is not determined by instrumental sensitivity alone. In practice, each stage of the workflow, from sample preparation and aerosol generation to transport efficiency, transient signal acquisition, and event discrimination, can alter the number of detected events and the calculated elemental mass per cell. This review discusses SC-ICP-MS from this workflow-centered perspective, focusing on the analytical bias introduced during sample handling, cell transport, instrumental acquisition, and data treatment. Attention is given to microflow introduction systems, collision/reaction cell strategies, ICP-MS/MS, ICP-TOF-MS, dwell-time selection, and Gaussian- and Poisson-based approaches for threshold definition. We also discuss how these factors affect the interpretation of endogenous elements, exogenous tracers, metal-labelled biomolecules, and particulate species in biological systems. Rather than treating single-cell distributions as direct representations of intracellular composition, we argue that the analytical workflow used to generate them should be considered when interpreting the data. This perspective is essential for improving comparability between studies and for moving SC-ICP-MS towards more reliable functional single-cell metallomics.","PeriodicalId":240,"journal":{"name":"Analytica Chimica Acta","volume":"150 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-Cell ICP-MS: A Review of Analytical Bias Across the Workflow\",\"authors\":\"Ketolly N.S. Leal, Alan J. Stewart, Carlos H.I. Ramos, Marco A.Z. Arruda\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aca.2026.346325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Single-cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS) has become an important tool for measuring elemental content in individual cells and revealing heterogeneity that is lost in bulk analysis. However, the reliability of these measurements is not determined by instrumental sensitivity alone. In practice, each stage of the workflow, from sample preparation and aerosol generation to transport efficiency, transient signal acquisition, and event discrimination, can alter the number of detected events and the calculated elemental mass per cell. This review discusses SC-ICP-MS from this workflow-centered perspective, focusing on the analytical bias introduced during sample handling, cell transport, instrumental acquisition, and data treatment. Attention is given to microflow introduction systems, collision/reaction cell strategies, ICP-MS/MS, ICP-TOF-MS, dwell-time selection, and Gaussian- and Poisson-based approaches for threshold definition. We also discuss how these factors affect the interpretation of endogenous elements, exogenous tracers, metal-labelled biomolecules, and particulate species in biological systems. Rather than treating single-cell distributions as direct representations of intracellular composition, we argue that the analytical workflow used to generate them should be considered when interpreting the data. This perspective is essential for improving comparability between studies and for moving SC-ICP-MS towards more reliable functional single-cell metallomics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytica Chimica Acta\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytica Chimica Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2026.346325\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2026.346325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单细胞电感耦合等离子体质谱(SC-ICP-MS)已成为测量单个细胞中元素含量和揭示在批量分析中丢失的异质性的重要工具。然而,这些测量的可靠性并不是由仪器灵敏度单独决定的。在实践中,工作流程的每个阶段,从样品制备和气溶胶产生到传输效率、瞬态信号采集和事件识别,都可以改变检测到的事件数量和每个细胞计算的元素质量。本文从以工作流程为中心的角度讨论了SC-ICP-MS,重点讨论了样品处理、细胞运输、仪器采集和数据处理过程中引入的分析偏差。重点关注微流引入系统、碰撞/反应池策略、ICP-MS/MS、ICP-TOF-MS、停留时间选择以及基于高斯和泊松的阈值定义方法。我们还讨论了这些因素如何影响生物系统中内源元素、外源示踪剂、金属标记生物分子和颗粒物种的解释。与其将单细胞分布视为细胞内组成的直接表示,我们认为在解释数据时应考虑用于生成它们的分析工作流。这一观点对于提高研究之间的可比性以及将SC-ICP-MS推向更可靠的功能单细胞金属组学至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-Cell ICP-MS: A Review of Analytical Bias Across the Workflow
Single-cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SC-ICP-MS) has become an important tool for measuring elemental content in individual cells and revealing heterogeneity that is lost in bulk analysis. However, the reliability of these measurements is not determined by instrumental sensitivity alone. In practice, each stage of the workflow, from sample preparation and aerosol generation to transport efficiency, transient signal acquisition, and event discrimination, can alter the number of detected events and the calculated elemental mass per cell. This review discusses SC-ICP-MS from this workflow-centered perspective, focusing on the analytical bias introduced during sample handling, cell transport, instrumental acquisition, and data treatment. Attention is given to microflow introduction systems, collision/reaction cell strategies, ICP-MS/MS, ICP-TOF-MS, dwell-time selection, and Gaussian- and Poisson-based approaches for threshold definition. We also discuss how these factors affect the interpretation of endogenous elements, exogenous tracers, metal-labelled biomolecules, and particulate species in biological systems. Rather than treating single-cell distributions as direct representations of intracellular composition, we argue that the analytical workflow used to generate them should be considered when interpreting the data. This perspective is essential for improving comparability between studies and for moving SC-ICP-MS towards more reliable functional single-cell metallomics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analytica Chimica Acta
Analytica Chimica Acta 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1081
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Analytica Chimica Acta has an open access mirror journal Analytica Chimica Acta: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Analytica Chimica Acta provides a forum for the rapid publication of original research, and critical, comprehensive reviews dealing with all aspects of fundamental and applied modern analytical chemistry. The journal welcomes the submission of research papers which report studies concerning the development of new and significant analytical methodologies. In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny will be placed on the degree of novelty and impact of the research and the extent to which it adds to the existing body of knowledge in analytical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书