对自然积极发展的环境影响评价再思考

IF 6.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-03 DOI:10.1002/fee.70068
Holly Kirk, Dale Wright, Georgia E Garrard, Casey Visintin, Matthew Selinske, Sarah A Bekessy
{"title":"对自然积极发展的环境影响评价再思考","authors":"Holly Kirk,&nbsp;Dale Wright,&nbsp;Georgia E Garrard,&nbsp;Casey Visintin,&nbsp;Matthew Selinske,&nbsp;Sarah A Bekessy","doi":"10.1002/fee.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Achieving “nature positive” development within existing regulatory frameworks will be challenging. Halting and reversing biodiversity loss requires protection, restoration, and enhancement of ecosystems alongside a fundamental shift in how biodiversity is valued and quantifiable improvements are assessed. A new approach is needed because traditional Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) focused on mitigating negative impacts will not promote positive outcomes. We propose an additional EIA pathway that assesses the potential for biodiversity gains at development sites, reframing biodiversity as an asset to be enhanced, rather than as a problem to avoid. By adding the identification of biodiversity-enhancing opportunities to development planning, this approach encourages actions that support sustainable and resilient ecosystems, providing a clearer link to the social and economic benefits that can also be accumulated. Through two hypothetical case studies, we illustrate how this nature positive pathway identifies biodiversity potential. We also discuss how developers may be incentivized to align with the global nature positive agenda</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Environmental Impact Assessment for nature positive development\",\"authors\":\"Holly Kirk,&nbsp;Dale Wright,&nbsp;Georgia E Garrard,&nbsp;Casey Visintin,&nbsp;Matthew Selinske,&nbsp;Sarah A Bekessy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fee.70068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Achieving “nature positive” development within existing regulatory frameworks will be challenging. Halting and reversing biodiversity loss requires protection, restoration, and enhancement of ecosystems alongside a fundamental shift in how biodiversity is valued and quantifiable improvements are assessed. A new approach is needed because traditional Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) focused on mitigating negative impacts will not promote positive outcomes. We propose an additional EIA pathway that assesses the potential for biodiversity gains at development sites, reframing biodiversity as an asset to be enhanced, rather than as a problem to avoid. By adding the identification of biodiversity-enhancing opportunities to development planning, this approach encourages actions that support sustainable and resilient ecosystems, providing a clearer link to the social and economic benefits that can also be accumulated. Through two hypothetical case studies, we illustrate how this nature positive pathway identifies biodiversity potential. We also discuss how developers may be incentivized to align with the global nature positive agenda</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"24 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70068\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.70068\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/9/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.70068","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现有监管框架内实现“自然积极”发展将是一项挑战。制止和扭转生物多样性丧失需要保护、恢复和加强生态系统,同时从根本上改变生物多样性的价值和可量化的改善评估方式。需要一种新的方法,因为传统的侧重于减轻负面影响的环境影响评估(eia)不会促进积极的结果。我们提出了一个额外的环境影响评估途径,评估开发地点生物多样性收益的潜力,将生物多样性重新定义为需要加强的资产,而不是需要避免的问题。通过在发展规划中增加对增强生物多样性机会的识别,这种方法鼓励采取行动,支持可持续和有复原力的生态系统,从而更明确地将生态系统与可积累的社会和经济效益联系起来。通过两个假设的案例研究,我们说明了这种自然积极途径如何识别生物多样性潜力。我们还讨论了如何激励开发人员与全球自然积极议程保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking Environmental Impact Assessment for nature positive development

Achieving “nature positive” development within existing regulatory frameworks will be challenging. Halting and reversing biodiversity loss requires protection, restoration, and enhancement of ecosystems alongside a fundamental shift in how biodiversity is valued and quantifiable improvements are assessed. A new approach is needed because traditional Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) focused on mitigating negative impacts will not promote positive outcomes. We propose an additional EIA pathway that assesses the potential for biodiversity gains at development sites, reframing biodiversity as an asset to be enhanced, rather than as a problem to avoid. By adding the identification of biodiversity-enhancing opportunities to development planning, this approach encourages actions that support sustainable and resilient ecosystems, providing a clearer link to the social and economic benefits that can also be accumulated. Through two hypothetical case studies, we illustrate how this nature positive pathway identifies biodiversity potential. We also discuss how developers may be incentivized to align with the global nature positive agenda.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书