海面上的威慑物减少了英国刺网渔业的海雀副渔获量

IF 5.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Thomas W. Horton, Robert Enever, Grant Course, Tom Hooper, Matthew C. Horton, Pete Kibel, Yann Rouxel, Paul St. Pierre, Brendan J. Godley, Philip D. Doherty
{"title":"海面上的威慑物减少了英国刺网渔业的海雀副渔获量","authors":"Thomas W. Horton,&nbsp;Robert Enever,&nbsp;Grant Course,&nbsp;Tom Hooper,&nbsp;Matthew C. Horton,&nbsp;Pete Kibel,&nbsp;Yann Rouxel,&nbsp;Paul St. Pierre,&nbsp;Brendan J. Godley,&nbsp;Philip D. Doherty","doi":"10.1111/con4.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seabird bycatch in gillnet fisheries is a globally pervasive conservation issue, yet evidence for effective, scalable mitigation remains limited. In a gillnet fishery off the United Kingdom (1057 sets), we evaluated two above water deterrents (AWDs); “scarybird” kites (“kites” hereafter) and looming-eyes buoys (LEBs) for reducing seabird bycatch. Both AWDs significantly reduced the chance of auk bycatch occurring (kites = −71%, LEB = −59% lower odds of a bycatch event) and magnitude when it did occur (kites = −62%, LEB = −68% reduction in bycatch per unit effort) relative to controls. Kites had a stronger deterrent effect &lt; 30 m from the device whereas LEBs were moderately effective over a broader range. Bycatch peaked in winter, and where net mesh sizes were 100–120 mm, indicating that targeted deployments of AWDs can maximize conservation benefit, while minimizing operational disruption. Given the ubiquity of gillnet fisheries, simple, low-cost AWDs offer a practical route to reducing bycatch and supporting conservation policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70082","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Above Water Deterrents Reduce Auk Bycatch in Gillnet Fisheries off the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Thomas W. Horton,&nbsp;Robert Enever,&nbsp;Grant Course,&nbsp;Tom Hooper,&nbsp;Matthew C. Horton,&nbsp;Pete Kibel,&nbsp;Yann Rouxel,&nbsp;Paul St. Pierre,&nbsp;Brendan J. Godley,&nbsp;Philip D. Doherty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/con4.70082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Seabird bycatch in gillnet fisheries is a globally pervasive conservation issue, yet evidence for effective, scalable mitigation remains limited. In a gillnet fishery off the United Kingdom (1057 sets), we evaluated two above water deterrents (AWDs); “scarybird” kites (“kites” hereafter) and looming-eyes buoys (LEBs) for reducing seabird bycatch. Both AWDs significantly reduced the chance of auk bycatch occurring (kites = −71%, LEB = −59% lower odds of a bycatch event) and magnitude when it did occur (kites = −62%, LEB = −68% reduction in bycatch per unit effort) relative to controls. Kites had a stronger deterrent effect &lt; 30 m from the device whereas LEBs were moderately effective over a broader range. Bycatch peaked in winter, and where net mesh sizes were 100–120 mm, indicating that targeted deployments of AWDs can maximize conservation benefit, while minimizing operational disruption. Given the ubiquity of gillnet fisheries, simple, low-cost AWDs offer a practical route to reducing bycatch and supporting conservation policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70082\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70082\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

刺网渔业中的海鸟附带捕获是一个全球普遍存在的保护问题,但有效、可扩展的缓解措施的证据仍然有限。在英国附近的刺网渔业(1057套)中,我们评估了两种以上水威慑(awd);“可怕的鸟”风筝(以下简称“风筝”)和若隐若现的眼睛浮标(leb),以减少海鸟的附带捕获。与对照组相比,两种awd都显著降低了海雀副渔获物发生的几率(风筝= - 71%,LEB = - 59%)和发生时的幅度(风筝= - 62%,LEB = - 68%)。风筝在距离装置30米的地方具有更强的威慑作用,而leb在更宽的范围内具有中等效果。副渔获量在冬季达到峰值,网孔尺寸为100-120毫米,这表明有针对性地部署awd可以最大限度地提高保护效益,同时最大限度地减少作业中断。鉴于刺网渔业的普遍存在,简单、低成本的awd为减少副渔获物和支持保护政策提供了一条切实可行的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Above Water Deterrents Reduce Auk Bycatch in Gillnet Fisheries off the United Kingdom

Seabird bycatch in gillnet fisheries is a globally pervasive conservation issue, yet evidence for effective, scalable mitigation remains limited. In a gillnet fishery off the United Kingdom (1057 sets), we evaluated two above water deterrents (AWDs); “scarybird” kites (“kites” hereafter) and looming-eyes buoys (LEBs) for reducing seabird bycatch. Both AWDs significantly reduced the chance of auk bycatch occurring (kites = −71%, LEB = −59% lower odds of a bycatch event) and magnitude when it did occur (kites = −62%, LEB = −68% reduction in bycatch per unit effort) relative to controls. Kites had a stronger deterrent effect < 30 m from the device whereas LEBs were moderately effective over a broader range. Bycatch peaked in winter, and where net mesh sizes were 100–120 mm, indicating that targeted deployments of AWDs can maximize conservation benefit, while minimizing operational disruption. Given the ubiquity of gillnet fisheries, simple, low-cost AWDs offer a practical route to reducing bycatch and supporting conservation policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书