Thomas W. Horton, Robert Enever, Grant Course, Tom Hooper, Matthew C. Horton, Pete Kibel, Yann Rouxel, Paul St. Pierre, Brendan J. Godley, Philip D. Doherty
{"title":"海面上的威慑物减少了英国刺网渔业的海雀副渔获量","authors":"Thomas W. Horton, Robert Enever, Grant Course, Tom Hooper, Matthew C. Horton, Pete Kibel, Yann Rouxel, Paul St. Pierre, Brendan J. Godley, Philip D. Doherty","doi":"10.1111/con4.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seabird bycatch in gillnet fisheries is a globally pervasive conservation issue, yet evidence for effective, scalable mitigation remains limited. In a gillnet fishery off the United Kingdom (1057 sets), we evaluated two above water deterrents (AWDs); “scarybird” kites (“kites” hereafter) and looming-eyes buoys (LEBs) for reducing seabird bycatch. Both AWDs significantly reduced the chance of auk bycatch occurring (kites = −71%, LEB = −59% lower odds of a bycatch event) and magnitude when it did occur (kites = −62%, LEB = −68% reduction in bycatch per unit effort) relative to controls. Kites had a stronger deterrent effect < 30 m from the device whereas LEBs were moderately effective over a broader range. Bycatch peaked in winter, and where net mesh sizes were 100–120 mm, indicating that targeted deployments of AWDs can maximize conservation benefit, while minimizing operational disruption. Given the ubiquity of gillnet fisheries, simple, low-cost AWDs offer a practical route to reducing bycatch and supporting conservation policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70082","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Above Water Deterrents Reduce Auk Bycatch in Gillnet Fisheries off the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Thomas W. Horton, Robert Enever, Grant Course, Tom Hooper, Matthew C. Horton, Pete Kibel, Yann Rouxel, Paul St. Pierre, Brendan J. Godley, Philip D. Doherty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/con4.70082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Seabird bycatch in gillnet fisheries is a globally pervasive conservation issue, yet evidence for effective, scalable mitigation remains limited. In a gillnet fishery off the United Kingdom (1057 sets), we evaluated two above water deterrents (AWDs); “scarybird” kites (“kites” hereafter) and looming-eyes buoys (LEBs) for reducing seabird bycatch. Both AWDs significantly reduced the chance of auk bycatch occurring (kites = −71%, LEB = −59% lower odds of a bycatch event) and magnitude when it did occur (kites = −62%, LEB = −68% reduction in bycatch per unit effort) relative to controls. Kites had a stronger deterrent effect < 30 m from the device whereas LEBs were moderately effective over a broader range. Bycatch peaked in winter, and where net mesh sizes were 100–120 mm, indicating that targeted deployments of AWDs can maximize conservation benefit, while minimizing operational disruption. Given the ubiquity of gillnet fisheries, simple, low-cost AWDs offer a practical route to reducing bycatch and supporting conservation policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70082\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70082\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70082","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Above Water Deterrents Reduce Auk Bycatch in Gillnet Fisheries off the United Kingdom
Seabird bycatch in gillnet fisheries is a globally pervasive conservation issue, yet evidence for effective, scalable mitigation remains limited. In a gillnet fishery off the United Kingdom (1057 sets), we evaluated two above water deterrents (AWDs); “scarybird” kites (“kites” hereafter) and looming-eyes buoys (LEBs) for reducing seabird bycatch. Both AWDs significantly reduced the chance of auk bycatch occurring (kites = −71%, LEB = −59% lower odds of a bycatch event) and magnitude when it did occur (kites = −62%, LEB = −68% reduction in bycatch per unit effort) relative to controls. Kites had a stronger deterrent effect < 30 m from the device whereas LEBs were moderately effective over a broader range. Bycatch peaked in winter, and where net mesh sizes were 100–120 mm, indicating that targeted deployments of AWDs can maximize conservation benefit, while minimizing operational disruption. Given the ubiquity of gillnet fisheries, simple, low-cost AWDs offer a practical route to reducing bycatch and supporting conservation policy.
期刊介绍:
Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.