危重患者脓毒症和严重感染的抗生素治疗持续时间。

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jean-François Timsit, Jason A Roberts, Souha Kanj, Matteo Bassetti, Rafael Canton, Paul Dark, Robert Fowler, Angela Huttner, Marin H Kollef, Scott T Micek, Robert G Sawyer, Michael Thy, Dafna Yahav, Nick Daneman
{"title":"危重患者脓毒症和严重感染的抗生素治疗持续时间。","authors":"Jean-François Timsit, Jason A Roberts, Souha Kanj, Matteo Bassetti, Rafael Canton, Paul Dark, Robert Fowler, Angela Huttner, Marin H Kollef, Scott T Micek, Robert G Sawyer, Michael Thy, Dafna Yahav, Nick Daneman","doi":"10.1093/ajrccm/aamag458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotic treatment duration in critically ill patients has undergone major reevaluation. Historically concerns for short therapy included a lower cure rate and emergence of resistance, whereas prolonged courses raised risks of microbiome disruption, superinfection, Clostridioides difficile colitis, and resistance. Defining optimal duration of therapy in sepsis and severe infections remains challenging due to heterogeneity in host immunity, pathogen virulence, infection site and source control. Mechanistic insights from microbiology and PK/PD highlight how bacterial inoculum, biofilms, mutant selection windows and altered drug distribution in critical illness influence bacterial clearance and resistance selection. Experimental models and PK-optimized dosing strategies underscore the potential to shorten therapy by accelerating pathogen eradication. Across a range of serious infections, randomized trials consistently show that short course therapy (<7 days) is noninferior to longer courses, including bacteremia, intra-abdominal infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Biomarker guided strategies-particularly procalcitonin-based algorithms-might further individualize duration of therapy and safely reduce exposure. Uncertainty remains for S. aureus bacteremia, infections caused by non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, difficult to treat multidrug-resistant organisms, invasive candidiasis and immunocompromised patients. Robust evidence supports markedly reduced duration of therapy for uncomplicated bloodstream infections after effective source control, intra-abdominal infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Infections involving retained prosthetic material or devices often require prolonged therapy or long-term suppressive regimens. Future research must include adequately powered trials across diverse populations, and evaluate rapid diagnostics, host-response profiling, and individualized response-guided strategies. Optimizing antibiotic duration in critically ill patients ultimately requires integrating mechanistic understanding, individual clinical evolution, and stewardship principles to balance potential efficacy and potential harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Duration of antibiotic therapy in sepsis and severe infections in critically ill patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jean-François Timsit, Jason A Roberts, Souha Kanj, Matteo Bassetti, Rafael Canton, Paul Dark, Robert Fowler, Angela Huttner, Marin H Kollef, Scott T Micek, Robert G Sawyer, Michael Thy, Dafna Yahav, Nick Daneman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajrccm/aamag458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibiotic treatment duration in critically ill patients has undergone major reevaluation. Historically concerns for short therapy included a lower cure rate and emergence of resistance, whereas prolonged courses raised risks of microbiome disruption, superinfection, Clostridioides difficile colitis, and resistance. Defining optimal duration of therapy in sepsis and severe infections remains challenging due to heterogeneity in host immunity, pathogen virulence, infection site and source control. Mechanistic insights from microbiology and PK/PD highlight how bacterial inoculum, biofilms, mutant selection windows and altered drug distribution in critical illness influence bacterial clearance and resistance selection. Experimental models and PK-optimized dosing strategies underscore the potential to shorten therapy by accelerating pathogen eradication. Across a range of serious infections, randomized trials consistently show that short course therapy (<7 days) is noninferior to longer courses, including bacteremia, intra-abdominal infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Biomarker guided strategies-particularly procalcitonin-based algorithms-might further individualize duration of therapy and safely reduce exposure. Uncertainty remains for S. aureus bacteremia, infections caused by non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, difficult to treat multidrug-resistant organisms, invasive candidiasis and immunocompromised patients. Robust evidence supports markedly reduced duration of therapy for uncomplicated bloodstream infections after effective source control, intra-abdominal infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Infections involving retained prosthetic material or devices often require prolonged therapy or long-term suppressive regimens. Future research must include adequately powered trials across diverse populations, and evaluate rapid diagnostics, host-response profiling, and individualized response-guided strategies. Optimizing antibiotic duration in critically ill patients ultimately requires integrating mechanistic understanding, individual clinical evolution, and stewardship principles to balance potential efficacy and potential harm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag458\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag458","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

危重病人的抗生素治疗持续时间经历了重大的重新评估。历史上对短期治疗的担忧包括治愈率较低和耐药性的出现,而延长疗程会增加微生物群破坏、重复感染、艰难梭菌结肠炎和耐药性的风险。由于宿主免疫、病原体毒力、感染部位和源控制的异质性,确定败血症和严重感染的最佳治疗时间仍然具有挑战性。来自微生物学和PK/PD的机制见解强调了危重疾病中细菌接种量、生物膜、突变体选择窗口和药物分布的改变如何影响细菌清除和耐药性选择。实验模型和pk优化的给药策略强调了通过加速病原体根除来缩短治疗时间的潜力。在一系列严重感染中,随机试验一致表明短期治疗(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Duration of antibiotic therapy in sepsis and severe infections in critically ill patients.

Antibiotic treatment duration in critically ill patients has undergone major reevaluation. Historically concerns for short therapy included a lower cure rate and emergence of resistance, whereas prolonged courses raised risks of microbiome disruption, superinfection, Clostridioides difficile colitis, and resistance. Defining optimal duration of therapy in sepsis and severe infections remains challenging due to heterogeneity in host immunity, pathogen virulence, infection site and source control. Mechanistic insights from microbiology and PK/PD highlight how bacterial inoculum, biofilms, mutant selection windows and altered drug distribution in critical illness influence bacterial clearance and resistance selection. Experimental models and PK-optimized dosing strategies underscore the potential to shorten therapy by accelerating pathogen eradication. Across a range of serious infections, randomized trials consistently show that short course therapy (<7 days) is noninferior to longer courses, including bacteremia, intra-abdominal infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Biomarker guided strategies-particularly procalcitonin-based algorithms-might further individualize duration of therapy and safely reduce exposure. Uncertainty remains for S. aureus bacteremia, infections caused by non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, difficult to treat multidrug-resistant organisms, invasive candidiasis and immunocompromised patients. Robust evidence supports markedly reduced duration of therapy for uncomplicated bloodstream infections after effective source control, intra-abdominal infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Infections involving retained prosthetic material or devices often require prolonged therapy or long-term suppressive regimens. Future research must include adequately powered trials across diverse populations, and evaluate rapid diagnostics, host-response profiling, and individualized response-guided strategies. Optimizing antibiotic duration in critically ill patients ultimately requires integrating mechanistic understanding, individual clinical evolution, and stewardship principles to balance potential efficacy and potential harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书