{"title":"恢复生态系统及其组成部分","authors":"Lynn V. Dicks, Clare Fitzsimmons, Sallie Bailey","doi":"10.1111/con4.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conservation regulation largely focuses on protecting threatened species and habitats, yet biodiversity loss continues at alarming rates. Existing regulatory frameworks for nature are insufficient to address the root causes of nature decline, without coupled mechanisms that restore the dynamic ecological and evolutionary processes through which nature itself can thrive and respond to global change. Using the UK as a case study, we examine options to embed “process-based approaches” in nature conservation policy. These approaches support nature in a different way by maintaining evolution, movement, interactions, and biogeochemical cycling to support ecosystem functions and properties. We identify eight recent pioneering examples from terrestrial and marine realms, including the District Level Licensing and Nutrient Neutrality Schemes, Protected Sites Strategies, and Ecosystem-Based Management. Our examples demonstrate the plurality of mechanisms through which process-based conservation can operate at larger landscape or seascape scales. Adopting process-based approaches requires careful navigation of trade‑offs in local contexts to avoid undermining protection of threatened species and habitats. We derive four principles that can enable process-based conservation to work effectively alongside species and habitat protection for long-term ecological recovery anywhere in the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recovering Ecosystems As Well As Their Constituent Parts\",\"authors\":\"Lynn V. Dicks, Clare Fitzsimmons, Sallie Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/con4.70088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Conservation regulation largely focuses on protecting threatened species and habitats, yet biodiversity loss continues at alarming rates. Existing regulatory frameworks for nature are insufficient to address the root causes of nature decline, without coupled mechanisms that restore the dynamic ecological and evolutionary processes through which nature itself can thrive and respond to global change. Using the UK as a case study, we examine options to embed “process-based approaches” in nature conservation policy. These approaches support nature in a different way by maintaining evolution, movement, interactions, and biogeochemical cycling to support ecosystem functions and properties. We identify eight recent pioneering examples from terrestrial and marine realms, including the District Level Licensing and Nutrient Neutrality Schemes, Protected Sites Strategies, and Ecosystem-Based Management. Our examples demonstrate the plurality of mechanisms through which process-based conservation can operate at larger landscape or seascape scales. Adopting process-based approaches requires careful navigation of trade‑offs in local contexts to avoid undermining protection of threatened species and habitats. We derive four principles that can enable process-based conservation to work effectively alongside species and habitat protection for long-term ecological recovery anywhere in the world.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"volume\":\"19 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70088\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conservation Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70088\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Recovering Ecosystems As Well As Their Constituent Parts
Conservation regulation largely focuses on protecting threatened species and habitats, yet biodiversity loss continues at alarming rates. Existing regulatory frameworks for nature are insufficient to address the root causes of nature decline, without coupled mechanisms that restore the dynamic ecological and evolutionary processes through which nature itself can thrive and respond to global change. Using the UK as a case study, we examine options to embed “process-based approaches” in nature conservation policy. These approaches support nature in a different way by maintaining evolution, movement, interactions, and biogeochemical cycling to support ecosystem functions and properties. We identify eight recent pioneering examples from terrestrial and marine realms, including the District Level Licensing and Nutrient Neutrality Schemes, Protected Sites Strategies, and Ecosystem-Based Management. Our examples demonstrate the plurality of mechanisms through which process-based conservation can operate at larger landscape or seascape scales. Adopting process-based approaches requires careful navigation of trade‑offs in local contexts to avoid undermining protection of threatened species and habitats. We derive four principles that can enable process-based conservation to work effectively alongside species and habitat protection for long-term ecological recovery anywhere in the world.
期刊介绍:
Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.