增殖性狼疮性肾炎伴低水平蛋白尿的长期预后和治疗:日本的一项多中心回顾性研究

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Takeshi Zoshima, Misaki Yoshida, Shiori Nakagawa, Ichiro Mizushima, Yasunori Iwata
{"title":"增殖性狼疮性肾炎伴低水平蛋白尿的长期预后和治疗:日本的一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"Takeshi Zoshima, Misaki Yoshida, Shiori Nakagawa, Ichiro Mizushima, Yasunori Iwata","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2026-002098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The long-term prognosis of patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (class III/IV) and low-level proteinuria remains unclear. Moreover, as some clinical trials have excluded them, the efficacy of some immunosuppressants for this subset of patients has not been strictly confirmed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the renal and overall survival and treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including 137 Japanese patients with biopsy-confirmed proliferative lupus nephritis from 11 hospitals. Based on previous reports, proteinuria of ≤1 g/gCr was defined as low-level proteinuria. The endpoints were kidney failure (KF) or death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the high-level proteinuria group (proteinuria >1 g/gCr), the low-level proteinuria group (62 cases (45.3%)) had better baseline renal functions and histology and included more patients initially treated with glucocorticoids (GCs) alone (26 (41.9%) vs 18 (24.0%), p=0.04). Maintenance therapy was similar between groups. After a median of 93 months, the low-level proteinuria group had a lower incidence of KF or death than the high-level proteinuria group (3 (4.8%) vs 22 (29.3%), p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant difference in the incidence of these outcomes between groups. Similarly, patients with low-level proteinuria initially treated with GCs alone exhibited a better long-term prognosis than those with high-level proteinuria. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that KF or death was associated with high levels of proteinuria but not with GCs alone for the initial treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with low-level proteinuria have a favourable long-term prognosis and are treated with less initial immunosuppressant use, suggesting a distinct clinical subgroup of proliferative lupus nephritis. Renal biopsy in the early phase with low-level proteinuria may lead to early diagnosis and treatment. A treatment strategy tailored to patients with low-level proteinuria may be required.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13599897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes and treatments for proliferative lupus nephritis with low-level proteinuria: a multicentre retrospective study in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Zoshima, Misaki Yoshida, Shiori Nakagawa, Ichiro Mizushima, Yasunori Iwata\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/lupus-2026-002098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The long-term prognosis of patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (class III/IV) and low-level proteinuria remains unclear. Moreover, as some clinical trials have excluded them, the efficacy of some immunosuppressants for this subset of patients has not been strictly confirmed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the renal and overall survival and treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including 137 Japanese patients with biopsy-confirmed proliferative lupus nephritis from 11 hospitals. Based on previous reports, proteinuria of ≤1 g/gCr was defined as low-level proteinuria. The endpoints were kidney failure (KF) or death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the high-level proteinuria group (proteinuria >1 g/gCr), the low-level proteinuria group (62 cases (45.3%)) had better baseline renal functions and histology and included more patients initially treated with glucocorticoids (GCs) alone (26 (41.9%) vs 18 (24.0%), p=0.04). Maintenance therapy was similar between groups. After a median of 93 months, the low-level proteinuria group had a lower incidence of KF or death than the high-level proteinuria group (3 (4.8%) vs 22 (29.3%), p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant difference in the incidence of these outcomes between groups. Similarly, patients with low-level proteinuria initially treated with GCs alone exhibited a better long-term prognosis than those with high-level proteinuria. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that KF or death was associated with high levels of proteinuria but not with GCs alone for the initial treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with low-level proteinuria have a favourable long-term prognosis and are treated with less initial immunosuppressant use, suggesting a distinct clinical subgroup of proliferative lupus nephritis. Renal biopsy in the early phase with low-level proteinuria may lead to early diagnosis and treatment. A treatment strategy tailored to patients with low-level proteinuria may be required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13599897/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lupus Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2026-002098\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2026-002098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:增殖性狼疮性肾炎(III/IV级)伴低水平蛋白尿患者的长期预后尚不清楚。此外,由于一些临床试验已将其排除在外,一些免疫抑制剂对这部分患者的疗效尚未得到严格证实。在这项研究中,我们的目的是探讨肾脏和总体生存和治疗。方法:我们对来自日本11家医院的137例活检证实的增生性狼疮性肾炎患者进行了回顾性研究。根据以往的报道,蛋白尿≤1 g/gCr被定义为低水平蛋白尿。终点为肾衰竭(KF)或死亡。结果:低水平蛋白尿组(62例(45.3%))与高水平蛋白尿组(蛋白尿1 g/gCr)相比,具有更好的基线肾功能和组织学,并且包括更多最初单独使用糖皮质激素(GCs)治疗的患者(26例(41.9%)vs 18例(24.0%),p=0.04)。各组间维持治疗相似。中位时间为93个月后,低水平蛋白尿组的KF或死亡发生率低于高水平蛋白尿组(3例(4.8%)vs 22例(29.3%))。结论:低水平蛋白尿患者具有良好的长期预后,并且初始免疫抑制剂使用较少,提示增殖性狼疮性肾炎是一个独特的临床亚组。低水平蛋白尿的早期肾活检可能导致早期诊断和治疗。可能需要针对低水平蛋白尿患者量身定制的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term outcomes and treatments for proliferative lupus nephritis with low-level proteinuria: a multicentre retrospective study in Japan.

Objective: The long-term prognosis of patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (class III/IV) and low-level proteinuria remains unclear. Moreover, as some clinical trials have excluded them, the efficacy of some immunosuppressants for this subset of patients has not been strictly confirmed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the renal and overall survival and treatments.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including 137 Japanese patients with biopsy-confirmed proliferative lupus nephritis from 11 hospitals. Based on previous reports, proteinuria of ≤1 g/gCr was defined as low-level proteinuria. The endpoints were kidney failure (KF) or death.

Results: Compared with the high-level proteinuria group (proteinuria >1 g/gCr), the low-level proteinuria group (62 cases (45.3%)) had better baseline renal functions and histology and included more patients initially treated with glucocorticoids (GCs) alone (26 (41.9%) vs 18 (24.0%), p=0.04). Maintenance therapy was similar between groups. After a median of 93 months, the low-level proteinuria group had a lower incidence of KF or death than the high-level proteinuria group (3 (4.8%) vs 22 (29.3%), p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant difference in the incidence of these outcomes between groups. Similarly, patients with low-level proteinuria initially treated with GCs alone exhibited a better long-term prognosis than those with high-level proteinuria. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that KF or death was associated with high levels of proteinuria but not with GCs alone for the initial treatment.

Conclusions: Patients with low-level proteinuria have a favourable long-term prognosis and are treated with less initial immunosuppressant use, suggesting a distinct clinical subgroup of proliferative lupus nephritis. Renal biopsy in the early phase with low-level proteinuria may lead to early diagnosis and treatment. A treatment strategy tailored to patients with low-level proteinuria may be required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书