{"title":"人工智能在纳米颗粒给药系统设计和开发中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Razan Haddad","doi":"10.1155/adpp/5531134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly emerged as a powerful tool for accelerating the design and optimization of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems (NDDSs). By analyzing complex multidimensional datasets, AI models can predict nanoparticle physicochemical properties, biodistribution, and safety profiles more efficiently than traditional experimental approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (ID: 1148160). Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink) were searched up to January 2025. Studies applying AI approaches, including machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid modeling to nanoparticle design, optimization, biodistribution prediction, or nanotoxicology, were included. Extracted data included nanoparticle platform, AI methodology, prediction targets, validation strategies, and reported performance metrics. Methodological quality was assessed using a framework integrating TRIPOD-AI and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 unique studies met the established eligibility criteria and were included in the final qualitative analysis. The applications of machine learning or deep-learning methods and models were demonstrated across the various nanoparticle-based platforms to predict the formulation properties, biodistribution, nano-bio interactions, therapeutic materials discovery, and nanoparticle toxicity. The models augmented by artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the physiologically based pharmacokinetic area manifested promising prediction ability for biodistribution, while the abilities differed among the datasets and the prediction endpoints. Nine studies incorporated in vitro or in vivo biological/experimental validation, whereas only four of the 17 included studies used independent external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI has significant potential to enhance nanoparticle formulation optimization, biodistribution modeling, and toxicity prediction. Nevertheless, translation into clinical practice remains constrained by small datasets, limited external validation, and inconsistent reporting standards. Future research should prioritize standardized datasets, transparent AI models, and prospective validation to advance AI-enabled nanomedicine toward clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7369,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"2026 ","pages":"5531134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence in the Design and Development of Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Razan Haddad\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/adpp/5531134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly emerged as a powerful tool for accelerating the design and optimization of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems (NDDSs). By analyzing complex multidimensional datasets, AI models can predict nanoparticle physicochemical properties, biodistribution, and safety profiles more efficiently than traditional experimental approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (ID: 1148160). Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink) were searched up to January 2025. Studies applying AI approaches, including machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid modeling to nanoparticle design, optimization, biodistribution prediction, or nanotoxicology, were included. Extracted data included nanoparticle platform, AI methodology, prediction targets, validation strategies, and reported performance metrics. Methodological quality was assessed using a framework integrating TRIPOD-AI and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 unique studies met the established eligibility criteria and were included in the final qualitative analysis. The applications of machine learning or deep-learning methods and models were demonstrated across the various nanoparticle-based platforms to predict the formulation properties, biodistribution, nano-bio interactions, therapeutic materials discovery, and nanoparticle toxicity. The models augmented by artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the physiologically based pharmacokinetic area manifested promising prediction ability for biodistribution, while the abilities differed among the datasets and the prediction endpoints. Nine studies incorporated in vitro or in vivo biological/experimental validation, whereas only four of the 17 included studies used independent external validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI has significant potential to enhance nanoparticle formulation optimization, biodistribution modeling, and toxicity prediction. Nevertheless, translation into clinical practice remains constrained by small datasets, limited external validation, and inconsistent reporting standards. Future research should prioritize standardized datasets, transparent AI models, and prospective validation to advance AI-enabled nanomedicine toward clinical implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"2026 \",\"pages\":\"5531134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/adpp/5531134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Pharmacological and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/adpp/5531134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:人工智能(AI)已迅速成为加速设计和优化基于纳米颗粒的药物递送系统(ndds)的强大工具。通过分析复杂的多维数据集,人工智能模型可以比传统的实验方法更有效地预测纳米颗粒的物理化学性质、生物分布和安全性。方法:本系统评价遵循PRISMA 2020指南进行,并在PROSPERO注册(ID: 1148160)。5个电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、ScienceDirect和SpringerLink)被检索至2025年1月。包括将人工智能方法应用于纳米颗粒设计、优化、生物分布预测或纳米毒理学的研究,包括机器学习、深度学习和混合建模。提取的数据包括纳米粒子平台、人工智能方法、预测目标、验证策略和报告的性能指标。使用TRIPOD-AI和乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)评估领域相结合的框架评估方法学质量。结果:共有17项独特的研究符合既定的资格标准,并被纳入最终的定性分析。机器学习或深度学习方法和模型的应用在各种基于纳米颗粒的平台上进行了演示,以预测配方特性、生物分布、纳米-生物相互作用、治疗材料发现和纳米颗粒毒性。在基于生理的药代动力学领域,人工智能技术增强的模型显示出良好的生物分布预测能力,但不同数据集和预测终点的预测能力存在差异。9项研究纳入了体外或体内生物/实验验证,而17项纳入的研究中只有4项使用了独立的外部验证。结论:人工智能在纳米颗粒配方优化、生物分布建模和毒性预测方面具有重要潜力。然而,转化为临床实践仍然受到小数据集、有限的外部验证和不一致的报告标准的限制。未来的研究应优先考虑标准化的数据集、透明的人工智能模型和前瞻性验证,以推动人工智能纳米医学走向临床应用。
Artificial Intelligence in the Design and Development of Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly emerged as a powerful tool for accelerating the design and optimization of nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems (NDDSs). By analyzing complex multidimensional datasets, AI models can predict nanoparticle physicochemical properties, biodistribution, and safety profiles more efficiently than traditional experimental approaches.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (ID: 1148160). Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink) were searched up to January 2025. Studies applying AI approaches, including machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid modeling to nanoparticle design, optimization, biodistribution prediction, or nanotoxicology, were included. Extracted data included nanoparticle platform, AI methodology, prediction targets, validation strategies, and reported performance metrics. Methodological quality was assessed using a framework integrating TRIPOD-AI and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal domains.
Results: A total of 17 unique studies met the established eligibility criteria and were included in the final qualitative analysis. The applications of machine learning or deep-learning methods and models were demonstrated across the various nanoparticle-based platforms to predict the formulation properties, biodistribution, nano-bio interactions, therapeutic materials discovery, and nanoparticle toxicity. The models augmented by artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the physiologically based pharmacokinetic area manifested promising prediction ability for biodistribution, while the abilities differed among the datasets and the prediction endpoints. Nine studies incorporated in vitro or in vivo biological/experimental validation, whereas only four of the 17 included studies used independent external validation.
Conclusions: AI has significant potential to enhance nanoparticle formulation optimization, biodistribution modeling, and toxicity prediction. Nevertheless, translation into clinical practice remains constrained by small datasets, limited external validation, and inconsistent reporting standards. Future research should prioritize standardized datasets, transparent AI models, and prospective validation to advance AI-enabled nanomedicine toward clinical implementation.