股票分析师对农业综合企业和食糖企业每股收益预测的准确性

IF 4.7 3区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Carlos O. Trejo-Pech, Karen L. DeLong, Robert Johansson
{"title":"股票分析师对农业综合企业和食糖企业每股收益预测的准确性","authors":"Carlos O. Trejo-Pech,&nbsp;Karen L. DeLong,&nbsp;Robert Johansson","doi":"10.1111/agec.70149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluates equity analysts’ earnings forecasts, comparing United States (U.S.) sugar-using firms (SUF), and a selected group of agribusinesses (AGB). Aspects of U.S. sugar policy, reinitiated in 1982, help to ensure a reliable and predictable domestic supply of SUF's primary ingredient, sugar. U.S. sugar policy requires the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to generate publicly available sugar supply and demand forecasts through its <i>World Agriculture Supply and Demand Estimates</i> (<i>WASDE</i>) report, introduced in 1992 and expanded in 2008 to include Mexican sugar forecasts. Therefore, we examined whether the reinitiation of U.S. sugar policy, the initiation of <i>WASDE</i> sugar forecasts, and the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) for sugar trade benefited SUF by improving equity analysts’ earnings per share (EPS) forecasting accuracy for these firms. This analysis, mainly based on difference-in-differences and event-study regression, focused on EPS forecast accuracy from 1976 to 2025. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that improvements in SUF EPS forecast accuracy were statistically associated with the reinitiation of U.S. sugar policy in 1982 and, to a lesser extent, with the implementation of the NAFTA sugar provision in 2008. More broadly, our analysis suggests that, given its role as a price- and supply-stabilizer, U.S. sugar policy might have caused a structural shift in the U.S. sugar industry, providing a more predictable business environment, and that its legacy may remain present in the contemporary forecasting environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50837,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Economics","volume":"57 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70149","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Accuracy of Equity Analysts’ Earnings Per Share Forecasts of Agribusinesses and Sugar-Using Firms\",\"authors\":\"Carlos O. Trejo-Pech,&nbsp;Karen L. DeLong,&nbsp;Robert Johansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/agec.70149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study evaluates equity analysts’ earnings forecasts, comparing United States (U.S.) sugar-using firms (SUF), and a selected group of agribusinesses (AGB). Aspects of U.S. sugar policy, reinitiated in 1982, help to ensure a reliable and predictable domestic supply of SUF's primary ingredient, sugar. U.S. sugar policy requires the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to generate publicly available sugar supply and demand forecasts through its <i>World Agriculture Supply and Demand Estimates</i> (<i>WASDE</i>) report, introduced in 1992 and expanded in 2008 to include Mexican sugar forecasts. Therefore, we examined whether the reinitiation of U.S. sugar policy, the initiation of <i>WASDE</i> sugar forecasts, and the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) for sugar trade benefited SUF by improving equity analysts’ earnings per share (EPS) forecasting accuracy for these firms. This analysis, mainly based on difference-in-differences and event-study regression, focused on EPS forecast accuracy from 1976 to 2025. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that improvements in SUF EPS forecast accuracy were statistically associated with the reinitiation of U.S. sugar policy in 1982 and, to a lesser extent, with the implementation of the NAFTA sugar provision in 2008. More broadly, our analysis suggests that, given its role as a price- and supply-stabilizer, U.S. sugar policy might have caused a structural shift in the U.S. sugar industry, providing a more predictable business environment, and that its legacy may remain present in the contemporary forecasting environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/agec.70149\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.70149\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/agec.70149","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了股票分析师的收益预测,比较了美国(U.S.)食糖公司(SUF)和一组选定的农业综合企业(AGB)。1982年重新启动的美国食糖政策有助于确保SUF主要原料糖的可靠和可预测的国内供应。美国的食糖政策要求美国农业部(USDA)通过其1992年推出的世界农业供需估计(WASDE)报告生成可公开获取的食糖供需预测。该报告于2008年进行了扩展,纳入了墨西哥食糖预测。因此,我们研究了美国食糖政策的重新启动、WASDE食糖预测的启动以及北美自由贸易协定(NAFTA)对食糖贸易的实施是否通过提高股票分析师对这些公司的每股收益(EPS)预测准确性而使SUF受益。本文主要采用差异中的差异回归和事件研究回归方法对1976 - 2025年EPS的预测精度进行了分析。与我们的假设一致,我们发现SUF EPS预测准确性的提高在统计上与1982年美国糖政策的重新启动有关,并且在较小程度上与2008年北美自由贸易协定糖条款的实施有关。更广泛地说,我们的分析表明,鉴于其作为价格和供应稳定器的作用,美国食糖政策可能已经导致了美国食糖行业的结构性转变,提供了一个更可预测的商业环境,其遗产可能仍然存在于当代预测环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Accuracy of Equity Analysts’ Earnings Per Share Forecasts of Agribusinesses and Sugar-Using Firms

This study evaluates equity analysts’ earnings forecasts, comparing United States (U.S.) sugar-using firms (SUF), and a selected group of agribusinesses (AGB). Aspects of U.S. sugar policy, reinitiated in 1982, help to ensure a reliable and predictable domestic supply of SUF's primary ingredient, sugar. U.S. sugar policy requires the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to generate publicly available sugar supply and demand forecasts through its World Agriculture Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report, introduced in 1992 and expanded in 2008 to include Mexican sugar forecasts. Therefore, we examined whether the reinitiation of U.S. sugar policy, the initiation of WASDE sugar forecasts, and the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) for sugar trade benefited SUF by improving equity analysts’ earnings per share (EPS) forecasting accuracy for these firms. This analysis, mainly based on difference-in-differences and event-study regression, focused on EPS forecast accuracy from 1976 to 2025. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found that improvements in SUF EPS forecast accuracy were statistically associated with the reinitiation of U.S. sugar policy in 1982 and, to a lesser extent, with the implementation of the NAFTA sugar provision in 2008. More broadly, our analysis suggests that, given its role as a price- and supply-stabilizer, U.S. sugar policy might have caused a structural shift in the U.S. sugar industry, providing a more predictable business environment, and that its legacy may remain present in the contemporary forecasting environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Economics
Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.90%
发文量
62
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Economics aims to disseminate the most important research results and policy analyses in our discipline, from all regions of the world. Topical coverage ranges from consumption and nutrition to land use and the environment, at every scale of analysis from households to markets and the macro-economy. Applicable methodologies include econometric estimation and statistical hypothesis testing, optimization and simulation models, descriptive reviews and policy analyses. We particularly encourage submission of empirical work that can be replicated and tested by others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书