机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁、护垫和健康相关生活质量

IF 0.5 Q4 NURSING
Kansuke Kawaguchi
{"title":"机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁、护垫和健康相关生活质量","authors":"Kansuke Kawaguchi","doi":"10.1111/ijun.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a widely used treatment for prostate cancer but is associated with postoperative urinary incontinence, which may necessitate the use of pads and ultimately affect health-related quality of life. Studies suggest that postoperative urinary incontinence and pad usage may negatively affect cancer-specific and urinary health-related quality of life. However, the relationship between general health-related quality of life and postoperative urinary incontinence remains unclear. This study examined the relationship between the frequency of postoperative urinary incontinence, number of pads used and general health-related quality of life within the first year after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. A prospective survey was conducted preoperatively with 90 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Data were collected preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures included the frequency of urinary incontinence, number of pads and 8-item Short-Form Health Survey scores for general health-related quality of life assessment. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the Short-Form Health Survey scores based on frequency of urinary incontinence and pad usage. Almost all participants experienced frequent urinary incontinence and required multiple pads within 1 month after surgery. Although postoperative urinary incontinence decreased over time, approximately 70.0% of the patients continued to experience urinary incontinence or used pads 1 year after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. However, no significant differences were observed in Short-Form Health Survey scores based on the frequency of urinary incontinence and pad usage used at each postoperative timepoint. These findings suggest that the frequency of postoperative urinary incontinence and pad usage may not be related to general health-related quality of life assessment. Along with long-term continence care, general health-related quality of life assessment may be improved by supporting daily living despite urinary incontinence and pad use.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary Incontinence, Pads and Health-Related Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"Kansuke Kawaguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijun.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a widely used treatment for prostate cancer but is associated with postoperative urinary incontinence, which may necessitate the use of pads and ultimately affect health-related quality of life. Studies suggest that postoperative urinary incontinence and pad usage may negatively affect cancer-specific and urinary health-related quality of life. However, the relationship between general health-related quality of life and postoperative urinary incontinence remains unclear. This study examined the relationship between the frequency of postoperative urinary incontinence, number of pads used and general health-related quality of life within the first year after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. A prospective survey was conducted preoperatively with 90 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Data were collected preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures included the frequency of urinary incontinence, number of pads and 8-item Short-Form Health Survey scores for general health-related quality of life assessment. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the Short-Form Health Survey scores based on frequency of urinary incontinence and pad usage. Almost all participants experienced frequent urinary incontinence and required multiple pads within 1 month after surgery. Although postoperative urinary incontinence decreased over time, approximately 70.0% of the patients continued to experience urinary incontinence or used pads 1 year after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. However, no significant differences were observed in Short-Form Health Survey scores based on the frequency of urinary incontinence and pad usage used at each postoperative timepoint. These findings suggest that the frequency of postoperative urinary incontinence and pad usage may not be related to general health-related quality of life assessment. Along with long-term continence care, general health-related quality of life assessment may be improved by supporting daily living despite urinary incontinence and pad use.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urological Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.70069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.70069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术是一种广泛使用的前列腺癌治疗方法,但与术后尿失禁相关,可能需要使用护垫,最终影响与健康相关的生活质量。研究表明,术后尿失禁和尿垫的使用可能会对癌症特异性和泌尿健康相关的生活质量产生负面影响。然而,总体健康相关生活质量与术后尿失禁之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究探讨了机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后一年内术后尿失禁的频率、使用的护垫数量与总体健康相关生活质量之间的关系。对90例接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的患者进行了术前前瞻性调查。术前和术后1、3、6、9和12个月采用自我管理问卷收集数据。结果测量包括尿失禁的频率、尿垫的数量和8项健康调查短表评分,用于总体健康相关生活质量评估。采用协方差分析比较基于尿失禁频率和尿垫使用的简短健康调查得分。几乎所有的参与者在术后1个月内都出现了频繁的尿失禁并需要多次尿垫。虽然术后尿失禁随着时间的推移而减少,但在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后1年,大约70.0%的患者继续出现尿失禁或使用尿垫。然而,基于术后每个时间点尿失禁频率和尿垫使用情况的简短健康调查得分没有观察到显著差异。这些发现提示术后尿失禁的频率和尿垫的使用可能与一般健康相关的生活质量评估无关。随着长期的尿失禁护理,一般健康相关的生活质量评估可以通过支持尿失禁和尿垫使用的日常生活来改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Urinary Incontinence, Pads and Health-Related Quality of Life After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is a widely used treatment for prostate cancer but is associated with postoperative urinary incontinence, which may necessitate the use of pads and ultimately affect health-related quality of life. Studies suggest that postoperative urinary incontinence and pad usage may negatively affect cancer-specific and urinary health-related quality of life. However, the relationship between general health-related quality of life and postoperative urinary incontinence remains unclear. This study examined the relationship between the frequency of postoperative urinary incontinence, number of pads used and general health-related quality of life within the first year after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. A prospective survey was conducted preoperatively with 90 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Data were collected preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively using a self-administered questionnaire. Outcome measures included the frequency of urinary incontinence, number of pads and 8-item Short-Form Health Survey scores for general health-related quality of life assessment. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the Short-Form Health Survey scores based on frequency of urinary incontinence and pad usage. Almost all participants experienced frequent urinary incontinence and required multiple pads within 1 month after surgery. Although postoperative urinary incontinence decreased over time, approximately 70.0% of the patients continued to experience urinary incontinence or used pads 1 year after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. However, no significant differences were observed in Short-Form Health Survey scores based on the frequency of urinary incontinence and pad usage used at each postoperative timepoint. These findings suggest that the frequency of postoperative urinary incontinence and pad usage may not be related to general health-related quality of life assessment. Along with long-term continence care, general health-related quality of life assessment may be improved by supporting daily living despite urinary incontinence and pad use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书