Tiffany P Hwa, Christian Jung, Archer R Schaeffer, Natalie Riebe, Shreya Bathula, Jason A Brant, Jianjing Kuang, William J Bologna, Catherine V Palmer
{"title":"发声时间对音素感知的影响及其对语言不可知论听力评估的启示。","authors":"Tiffany P Hwa, Christian Jung, Archer R Schaeffer, Natalie Riebe, Shreya Bathula, Jason A Brant, Jianjing Kuang, William J Bologna, Catherine V Palmer","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of native language on phoneme perception in normal-hearing (NH) adults representing the three most commonly spoken languages in the United States (English, Spanish, and Mandarin Chinese).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study was performed at a tertiary care institution. Ninety-five NH young adults completed Experiment 1: 36 native English, 32 native Mandarin, and 27 native Spanish speakers, with an average age of 21.5 years, recruited from a university population. A subset of 30 NH participants drawn from the Experiment 1 cohort (10 per language group) completed Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) same-different paradigm was developed using paired stimuli drawn from an 11-step continuum spanning English /d/-/t/ voice onset time (VOT). Pairs were categorized as subtle, intermediate, or pronounced based on degree of VOT contrast. Experiment 2 utilized a 3AFC odd-one-out paradigm with 16 tasks, with an expanded stimulus library. The stimuli were consonant-vowel (CV) and VCV phrases that were inclusive of voicing contrast but also place, manner, and vowel contrasts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall performance in Experiment 1 did not differ significantly across language groups (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.81, <i>p</i> = .090). However, when stratified by degree of VOT contrast, a significant group effect emerged for intermediate VOT pairs (χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.59, <i>p</i> = .023), driven by differences between Mandarin and Spanish speakers (χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.59, <i>p</i> = .0059, Bonferroni corrected). No significant differences were observed between English speakers and either of the other groups. In Experiment 2, all three language groups achieved 100% accuracy across phoneme pairs spanning multiple contrast types, with no language-related differences detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While native language affects discrimination of intermediate VOT contrasts in NH adults, performance converges when using a broader set of stimuli. These results provide preliminary support for discrimination-based approaches to speech perception assessment and highlight the importance of stimulus selection and task design in minimizing language-related bias. Further studies are required to evaluate sensitivity and clinical applicability in more challenging listening environments and with hard of hearing populations.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33470986.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Voice Onset Time on Phoneme Perception and Implications for a Language-Agnostic Hearing Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany P Hwa, Christian Jung, Archer R Schaeffer, Natalie Riebe, Shreya Bathula, Jason A Brant, Jianjing Kuang, William J Bologna, Catherine V Palmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of native language on phoneme perception in normal-hearing (NH) adults representing the three most commonly spoken languages in the United States (English, Spanish, and Mandarin Chinese).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study was performed at a tertiary care institution. Ninety-five NH young adults completed Experiment 1: 36 native English, 32 native Mandarin, and 27 native Spanish speakers, with an average age of 21.5 years, recruited from a university population. A subset of 30 NH participants drawn from the Experiment 1 cohort (10 per language group) completed Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) same-different paradigm was developed using paired stimuli drawn from an 11-step continuum spanning English /d/-/t/ voice onset time (VOT). Pairs were categorized as subtle, intermediate, or pronounced based on degree of VOT contrast. Experiment 2 utilized a 3AFC odd-one-out paradigm with 16 tasks, with an expanded stimulus library. The stimuli were consonant-vowel (CV) and VCV phrases that were inclusive of voicing contrast but also place, manner, and vowel contrasts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall performance in Experiment 1 did not differ significantly across language groups (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.81, <i>p</i> = .090). However, when stratified by degree of VOT contrast, a significant group effect emerged for intermediate VOT pairs (χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.59, <i>p</i> = .023), driven by differences between Mandarin and Spanish speakers (χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.59, <i>p</i> = .0059, Bonferroni corrected). No significant differences were observed between English speakers and either of the other groups. In Experiment 2, all three language groups achieved 100% accuracy across phoneme pairs spanning multiple contrast types, with no language-related differences detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While native language affects discrimination of intermediate VOT contrasts in NH adults, performance converges when using a broader set of stimuli. These results provide preliminary support for discrimination-based approaches to speech perception assessment and highlight the importance of stimulus selection and task design in minimizing language-related bias. Further studies are required to evaluate sensitivity and clinical applicability in more challenging listening environments and with hard of hearing populations.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33470986.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是评估母语对正常听力成年人(NH)音素感知的影响,这些成年人代表了美国三种最常用的口语(英语、西班牙语和普通话)。方法:在一家三级医疗机构进行前瞻性横断面研究。95名NH年轻人完成了实验1:36名母语为英语的人,32名母语为普通话的人,27名母语为西班牙语的人,平均年龄21.5岁,从大学人口中招募。从实验1队列中抽取30名NH参与者(每个语言组10名)完成实验2。实验1采用英语/d/-/t/语音起始时间(VOT) 11步连续体的配对刺激,建立了一种双选项强迫选择相同-不同范式。根据VOT对比的程度,对被分类为细微的、中间的或明显的。实验2采用3AFC奇一出范式,有16个任务,并扩展了刺激库。刺激是辅音-元音(CV)和VCV短语,包括发音对比,也包括地点、方式和元音对比。结果:实验1的整体表现在不同语言组之间没有显著差异(χ2 = 4.81, p = 0.090)。然而,当按VOT对比程度分层时,由于普通话和西班牙语使用者之间的差异(χ2 = 7.59, p = 0.0059, Bonferroni纠正),中间VOT对出现了显著的群体效应(χ2 = 7.59, p = 0.023)。在说英语的人和其他两组人之间没有观察到明显的差异。在实验2中,所有三个语言组在跨越多种对比类型的音素对上都达到了100%的准确率,没有发现与语言相关的差异。结论:虽然母语会影响NH成人对中间VOT对比的辨别,但当使用更广泛的刺激时,表现会趋同。这些结果为基于歧视的语音感知评估方法提供了初步支持,并强调了刺激选择和任务设计在减少语言相关偏见方面的重要性。需要进一步的研究来评估在更具挑战性的听力环境和重听人群中的敏感性和临床适用性。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33470986。
Impact of Voice Onset Time on Phoneme Perception and Implications for a Language-Agnostic Hearing Assessment.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of native language on phoneme perception in normal-hearing (NH) adults representing the three most commonly spoken languages in the United States (English, Spanish, and Mandarin Chinese).
Method: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed at a tertiary care institution. Ninety-five NH young adults completed Experiment 1: 36 native English, 32 native Mandarin, and 27 native Spanish speakers, with an average age of 21.5 years, recruited from a university population. A subset of 30 NH participants drawn from the Experiment 1 cohort (10 per language group) completed Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) same-different paradigm was developed using paired stimuli drawn from an 11-step continuum spanning English /d/-/t/ voice onset time (VOT). Pairs were categorized as subtle, intermediate, or pronounced based on degree of VOT contrast. Experiment 2 utilized a 3AFC odd-one-out paradigm with 16 tasks, with an expanded stimulus library. The stimuli were consonant-vowel (CV) and VCV phrases that were inclusive of voicing contrast but also place, manner, and vowel contrasts.
Results: Overall performance in Experiment 1 did not differ significantly across language groups (χ2 = 4.81, p = .090). However, when stratified by degree of VOT contrast, a significant group effect emerged for intermediate VOT pairs (χ2 = 7.59, p = .023), driven by differences between Mandarin and Spanish speakers (χ2 = 7.59, p = .0059, Bonferroni corrected). No significant differences were observed between English speakers and either of the other groups. In Experiment 2, all three language groups achieved 100% accuracy across phoneme pairs spanning multiple contrast types, with no language-related differences detected.
Conclusions: While native language affects discrimination of intermediate VOT contrasts in NH adults, performance converges when using a broader set of stimuli. These results provide preliminary support for discrimination-based approaches to speech perception assessment and highlight the importance of stimulus selection and task design in minimizing language-related bias. Further studies are required to evaluate sensitivity and clinical applicability in more challenging listening environments and with hard of hearing populations.
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.