预测巴西一家医院癌症患者30天的意外再入院:一种机器学习方法。

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AO2210
Nickolas Stabellini, Marilia Melo Favalesso, Claudia Szlejf, Cesar Gomes Miguel, Roberto Carmagnani Pestana, Hanna Kim, Gabriela de Carvalho Ferreira, Kristin A Waite, Alberto J Montero, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Edson Amaro Junior, Nelson Hamerschlak
{"title":"预测巴西一家医院癌症患者30天的意外再入院:一种机器学习方法。","authors":"Nickolas Stabellini, Marilia Melo Favalesso, Claudia Szlejf, Cesar Gomes Miguel, Roberto Carmagnani Pestana, Hanna Kim, Gabriela de Carvalho Ferreira, Kristin A Waite, Alberto J Montero, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Edson Amaro Junior, Nelson Hamerschlak","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AO2210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop Machine Learning models to predict 30-day unplanned readmissions in cancer patients treated at a private hospital in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included admission records of hospitalizations lasting >24 hours, with a corresponding diagnosis of a solid malignancy. The primary outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission. We tested five supervised Machine Learning algorithms to develop predictive models: a \"48-hour\" model, which used data from the first 48 hours after admission, and a \"discharge\" model, which used data from the entire hospitalization. The optimal models were selected based on their median performance (area under the ROC curve [AUC], precision, recall, F1, and Fβ-Score). Model explainability was assessed using SHAP scores (SS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 3,728 admissions from 1,573 cancer patients, with an unplanned 30-day readmission rate of 21.13%. The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated the best-balanced performance for the 48-hour model (AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.71), whereas LightGBM performed best for the discharge model (AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.72). In both models, the top predictor was prior emergency department visits in the past six months (SS=0.074 and 0.053, respectively). The top 10 predictors included: laboratory values (including lymphocyte count, Gamma-glutamyl transferase, Red Cell Distribution Width, hemoglobin, sodium, monocyte count, hematocrit, and urea), vital signs, and emergency index admission in both models, with colon cancer ranking among the top predictors in the 48-hour model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The models underscored the significance of prior emergency department visits, laboratory values, and vital signs as key predictors of 30-day unplanned readmission. The timing of laboratory and vitals influenced their predictive strength. Implementing these models could help providers develop personalized care strategies to reduce readmission risk. External validation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"24 ","pages":"eAO2210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting 30-day unplanned readmissions in patients with cancer in a Brazilian hospital: a Machine Learning approach.\",\"authors\":\"Nickolas Stabellini, Marilia Melo Favalesso, Claudia Szlejf, Cesar Gomes Miguel, Roberto Carmagnani Pestana, Hanna Kim, Gabriela de Carvalho Ferreira, Kristin A Waite, Alberto J Montero, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Edson Amaro Junior, Nelson Hamerschlak\",\"doi\":\"10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AO2210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop Machine Learning models to predict 30-day unplanned readmissions in cancer patients treated at a private hospital in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included admission records of hospitalizations lasting >24 hours, with a corresponding diagnosis of a solid malignancy. The primary outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission. We tested five supervised Machine Learning algorithms to develop predictive models: a \\\"48-hour\\\" model, which used data from the first 48 hours after admission, and a \\\"discharge\\\" model, which used data from the entire hospitalization. The optimal models were selected based on their median performance (area under the ROC curve [AUC], precision, recall, F1, and Fβ-Score). Model explainability was assessed using SHAP scores (SS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 3,728 admissions from 1,573 cancer patients, with an unplanned 30-day readmission rate of 21.13%. The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated the best-balanced performance for the 48-hour model (AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.71), whereas LightGBM performed best for the discharge model (AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.72). In both models, the top predictor was prior emergency department visits in the past six months (SS=0.074 and 0.053, respectively). The top 10 predictors included: laboratory values (including lymphocyte count, Gamma-glutamyl transferase, Red Cell Distribution Width, hemoglobin, sodium, monocyte count, hematocrit, and urea), vital signs, and emergency index admission in both models, with colon cancer ranking among the top predictors in the 48-hour model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The models underscored the significance of prior emergency department visits, laboratory values, and vital signs as key predictors of 30-day unplanned readmission. The timing of laboratory and vitals influenced their predictive strength. Implementing these models could help providers develop personalized care strategies to reduce readmission risk. External validation is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Einstein-Sao Paulo\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"eAO2210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13682789/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Einstein-Sao Paulo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AO2210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AO2210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在开发机器学习模型,以预测在巴西一家私立医院接受治疗的癌症患者30天内的意外再入院。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入了住院时间为100 ~ 24小时并相应诊断为实性恶性肿瘤的住院记录。主要结局是30天的非计划再入院。我们测试了五种有监督的机器学习算法来开发预测模型:“48小时”模型使用入院后48小时的数据,“出院”模型使用整个住院期间的数据。根据模型的中位数表现(ROC曲线下面积[AUC]、精度、召回率、F1和Fβ-Score)选择最优模型。使用SHAP评分(SS)评估模型的可解释性。结果:我们分析了1,573例癌症患者的3,728例入院,计划外30天再入院率为21.13%。随机森林算法在48小时模型中表现出最佳的平衡性能(AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.71),而LightGBM算法在放电模型中表现最佳(AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.72)。在这两个模型中,最重要的预测因子是过去六个月内的急诊就诊(SS分别=0.074和0.053)。前10位预测因子包括:两种模型的实验室值(包括淋巴细胞计数、γ -谷氨酰转移酶、红细胞分布宽度、血红蛋白、钠、单核细胞计数、红细胞压比和尿素)、生命体征和急诊指数入院,其中结肠癌在48小时模型中排名前10位。结论:该模型强调了先前急诊就诊、实验室值和生命体征作为30天意外再入院的关键预测因素的重要性。实验室和生命体征的时间影响了它们的预测强度。实施这些模型可以帮助提供者制定个性化的护理策略,以减少再入院风险。需要外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting 30-day unplanned readmissions in patients with cancer in a Brazilian hospital: a Machine Learning approach.

Objective: This study aims to develop Machine Learning models to predict 30-day unplanned readmissions in cancer patients treated at a private hospital in Brazil.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included admission records of hospitalizations lasting >24 hours, with a corresponding diagnosis of a solid malignancy. The primary outcome was 30-day unplanned readmission. We tested five supervised Machine Learning algorithms to develop predictive models: a "48-hour" model, which used data from the first 48 hours after admission, and a "discharge" model, which used data from the entire hospitalization. The optimal models were selected based on their median performance (area under the ROC curve [AUC], precision, recall, F1, and Fβ-Score). Model explainability was assessed using SHAP scores (SS).

Results: We analyzed 3,728 admissions from 1,573 cancer patients, with an unplanned 30-day readmission rate of 21.13%. The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated the best-balanced performance for the 48-hour model (AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.71), whereas LightGBM performed best for the discharge model (AUC = 0.70, IQR= 0.68-0.72). In both models, the top predictor was prior emergency department visits in the past six months (SS=0.074 and 0.053, respectively). The top 10 predictors included: laboratory values (including lymphocyte count, Gamma-glutamyl transferase, Red Cell Distribution Width, hemoglobin, sodium, monocyte count, hematocrit, and urea), vital signs, and emergency index admission in both models, with colon cancer ranking among the top predictors in the 48-hour model.

Conclusion: The models underscored the significance of prior emergency department visits, laboratory values, and vital signs as key predictors of 30-day unplanned readmission. The timing of laboratory and vitals influenced their predictive strength. Implementing these models could help providers develop personalized care strategies to reduce readmission risk. External validation is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书