Wenhui Ma, Lihai Chen, Di Zhou, Jiayu Jin, Liu Han
{"title":"不同干预措施对上肢手术臂丛神经阻滞后反跳痛的疗效比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Wenhui Ma, Lihai Chen, Di Zhou, Jiayu Jin, Liu Han","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rebound pain is a common transient severe pain after peripheral nerve block subsidence, impairing block efficacy and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the preventive and therapeutic effects of six interventions - dexamethasone, esketamine, dexmedetomidine, liposomal bupivacaine, continuous nerve block and combined nerve block (brachial plexus block via multiple approaches) - on rebound pain after upper extremity surgery brachial plexus block to provide evidence-based references for optimising clinical analgesic regimens.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Datasources: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched up to 10 October 2025.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of the above interventions for rebound pain prevention and treatment after brachial plexus block in upper extremity surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 RCTs involving 1699 patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo, dexamethasone [odds ratio (OR) = 0.22 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.42), dexmedetomidine (OR = 0.23 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.68)] and continuous nerve block [OR = 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.33)] significantly reduced rebound pain incidence. Dexamethasone [mean difference (MD) = -2.54 (95% CI, -4.76 to -0.26)] and continuous nerve block [MD = -3.10 (95% CI, -5.86 to -0.23)] lowered 12-h postoperative pain scores. Compared with placebo, combined nerve block [MD = -0.86 (95% CI, -1.59 to -0.13)] reduced postoperative 24-h pain scores. SUCRA results ranked continuous nerve block as the most favourable intervention for reducing rebound pain and 12-h/24-h postoperative pain scores. These reflect relative probabilities rather than absolute efficacy and require further validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing upper-extremity surgery with brachial plexus block, current network meta-analysis findings suggest that continuous nerve block is associated with a lower incidence of rebound pain and reduced pain scores at 12 and 24 h postoperatively, although further validation is still required. We recommend that continuous nerve block may be considered for patients at high risk of rebound pain to balance efficacy and safety. Given the limited certainty of evidence, these findings should be regarded as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive conclusions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD420251251811).</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the efficacy of different interventions for rebound pain after brachial plexus block in upper extremity surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wenhui Ma, Lihai Chen, Di Zhou, Jiayu Jin, Liu Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rebound pain is a common transient severe pain after peripheral nerve block subsidence, impairing block efficacy and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the preventive and therapeutic effects of six interventions - dexamethasone, esketamine, dexmedetomidine, liposomal bupivacaine, continuous nerve block and combined nerve block (brachial plexus block via multiple approaches) - on rebound pain after upper extremity surgery brachial plexus block to provide evidence-based references for optimising clinical analgesic regimens.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Datasources: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched up to 10 October 2025.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of the above interventions for rebound pain prevention and treatment after brachial plexus block in upper extremity surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 RCTs involving 1699 patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo, dexamethasone [odds ratio (OR) = 0.22 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.42), dexmedetomidine (OR = 0.23 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.68)] and continuous nerve block [OR = 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.33)] significantly reduced rebound pain incidence. Dexamethasone [mean difference (MD) = -2.54 (95% CI, -4.76 to -0.26)] and continuous nerve block [MD = -3.10 (95% CI, -5.86 to -0.23)] lowered 12-h postoperative pain scores. Compared with placebo, combined nerve block [MD = -0.86 (95% CI, -1.59 to -0.13)] reduced postoperative 24-h pain scores. SUCRA results ranked continuous nerve block as the most favourable intervention for reducing rebound pain and 12-h/24-h postoperative pain scores. These reflect relative probabilities rather than absolute efficacy and require further validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing upper-extremity surgery with brachial plexus block, current network meta-analysis findings suggest that continuous nerve block is associated with a lower incidence of rebound pain and reduced pain scores at 12 and 24 h postoperatively, although further validation is still required. We recommend that continuous nerve block may be considered for patients at high risk of rebound pain to balance efficacy and safety. Given the limited certainty of evidence, these findings should be regarded as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive conclusions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD420251251811).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002486\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002486","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the efficacy of different interventions for rebound pain after brachial plexus block in upper extremity surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Background: Rebound pain is a common transient severe pain after peripheral nerve block subsidence, impairing block efficacy and patient satisfaction.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the preventive and therapeutic effects of six interventions - dexamethasone, esketamine, dexmedetomidine, liposomal bupivacaine, continuous nerve block and combined nerve block (brachial plexus block via multiple approaches) - on rebound pain after upper extremity surgery brachial plexus block to provide evidence-based references for optimising clinical analgesic regimens.
Design: Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Datasources: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched up to 10 October 2025.
Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of the above interventions for rebound pain prevention and treatment after brachial plexus block in upper extremity surgery.
Results: A total of 22 RCTs involving 1699 patients were included. Network meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo, dexamethasone [odds ratio (OR) = 0.22 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.42), dexmedetomidine (OR = 0.23 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.68)] and continuous nerve block [OR = 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.33)] significantly reduced rebound pain incidence. Dexamethasone [mean difference (MD) = -2.54 (95% CI, -4.76 to -0.26)] and continuous nerve block [MD = -3.10 (95% CI, -5.86 to -0.23)] lowered 12-h postoperative pain scores. Compared with placebo, combined nerve block [MD = -0.86 (95% CI, -1.59 to -0.13)] reduced postoperative 24-h pain scores. SUCRA results ranked continuous nerve block as the most favourable intervention for reducing rebound pain and 12-h/24-h postoperative pain scores. These reflect relative probabilities rather than absolute efficacy and require further validation.
Conclusion: In patients undergoing upper-extremity surgery with brachial plexus block, current network meta-analysis findings suggest that continuous nerve block is associated with a lower incidence of rebound pain and reduced pain scores at 12 and 24 h postoperatively, although further validation is still required. We recommend that continuous nerve block may be considered for patients at high risk of rebound pain to balance efficacy and safety. Given the limited certainty of evidence, these findings should be regarded as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive conclusions.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).