Jörg Schultz, Liza Rothkoff, Edgar O Aviles-Rosa, Nathaniel J Hall, Michele N Maughan
{"title":"预测探测犬错过的警报。","authors":"Jörg Schultz, Liza Rothkoff, Edgar O Aviles-Rosa, Nathaniel J Hall, Michele N Maughan","doi":"10.1038/s41598-026-71367-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Detection dogs are widely used in tasks ranging from explosives detection to medical diagnostics. Yet even well-trained dogs occasionally fail to indicate target odors. Such missed alerts can have severe operational consequences. Here we show that missed alerts are preceded by measurable changes in the dog's behavioral and physiological state. Using a controlled olfacto-treadmill system with precisely timed odor presentation, we analyzed movement dynamics and physiological signals during the seconds preceding each trial. A machine learning model trained on pre-odor movement patterns predicted subsequent missed indications with above-chance accuracy (AUC = 0.81). Adding heart rate, short-term variation in the intervals between heartbeats, and core body temperature to the model increased the identification of missed alerts from 77 to 85%. As these signals emerged seconds before odor exposure, they may reflect variation in a broader performance state rather than isolated trial-specific events. Combining predictions across consecutive trials thus provided a running estimate of miss risk across the session. Together, these findings suggest that detection performance reflects a dynamic biological process and provide a foundation for anticipatory monitoring of working dog readiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13578711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting missed alerts in detection dogs.\",\"authors\":\"Jörg Schultz, Liza Rothkoff, Edgar O Aviles-Rosa, Nathaniel J Hall, Michele N Maughan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-026-71367-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Detection dogs are widely used in tasks ranging from explosives detection to medical diagnostics. Yet even well-trained dogs occasionally fail to indicate target odors. Such missed alerts can have severe operational consequences. Here we show that missed alerts are preceded by measurable changes in the dog's behavioral and physiological state. Using a controlled olfacto-treadmill system with precisely timed odor presentation, we analyzed movement dynamics and physiological signals during the seconds preceding each trial. A machine learning model trained on pre-odor movement patterns predicted subsequent missed indications with above-chance accuracy (AUC = 0.81). Adding heart rate, short-term variation in the intervals between heartbeats, and core body temperature to the model increased the identification of missed alerts from 77 to 85%. As these signals emerged seconds before odor exposure, they may reflect variation in a broader performance state rather than isolated trial-specific events. Combining predictions across consecutive trials thus provided a running estimate of miss risk across the session. Together, these findings suggest that detection performance reflects a dynamic biological process and provide a foundation for anticipatory monitoring of working dog readiness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13578711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-71367-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-71367-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Detection dogs are widely used in tasks ranging from explosives detection to medical diagnostics. Yet even well-trained dogs occasionally fail to indicate target odors. Such missed alerts can have severe operational consequences. Here we show that missed alerts are preceded by measurable changes in the dog's behavioral and physiological state. Using a controlled olfacto-treadmill system with precisely timed odor presentation, we analyzed movement dynamics and physiological signals during the seconds preceding each trial. A machine learning model trained on pre-odor movement patterns predicted subsequent missed indications with above-chance accuracy (AUC = 0.81). Adding heart rate, short-term variation in the intervals between heartbeats, and core body temperature to the model increased the identification of missed alerts from 77 to 85%. As these signals emerged seconds before odor exposure, they may reflect variation in a broader performance state rather than isolated trial-specific events. Combining predictions across consecutive trials thus provided a running estimate of miss risk across the session. Together, these findings suggest that detection performance reflects a dynamic biological process and provide a foundation for anticipatory monitoring of working dog readiness.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.