多伦多中产阶级化的视觉谈判:城市标识的争论、政治化和抵抗

IF 2.4 2区 经济学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Lindi Jahiu, Jonathan Cinnamon, Agnieszka Leszczynski
{"title":"多伦多中产阶级化的视觉谈判:城市标识的争论、政治化和抵抗","authors":"Lindi Jahiu,&nbsp;Jonathan Cinnamon,&nbsp;Agnieszka Leszczynski","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article engages signage as a medium through which urban stakeholders negotiate the politics of housing redevelopment and gentrification in cities. Focusing on Toronto, we examine housing-related signage in three neighbourhoods where social mix approaches to redevelopment have ushered in gentrification: Parkdale, Regent Park, and Moss Park. We identify three types of signs through which these politics are expressed: notice of proposed development boards, developer-branded placards, and paper posters. By analyzing both the original contents of and ad hoc changes made to select instances of these signs, we identify that gentrification through housing (re)development is <i>contested</i>, <i>de-</i> and <i>re-politicized</i> and <i>resisted</i>. In Parkdale, notice of proposed development boards communicate imminent transformations of the neighbourhood, while constituting a medium through which they are <i>contested</i>. In Regent Park, developer-branded placards <i>depoliticize</i> redevelopment through discursive commodifications of diversity, while also allowing for these commodifications to be <i>repoliticized</i>. In Moss Park, paper posters mobilize grassroots <i>resistance</i> to private condominium development. We argue that more attention should be paid to ad hoc alterations to signage beyond their explicit messaging, as a source of street-level insight into how multi-stakeholder gentrification politics materially unfold in cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","volume":"50 5","pages":"1152-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-2427.70071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VISUAL NEGOTIATIONS OF GENTRIFICATION IN TORONTO: Contestation, Politicization and Resistance through Urban Signage\",\"authors\":\"Lindi Jahiu,&nbsp;Jonathan Cinnamon,&nbsp;Agnieszka Leszczynski\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-2427.70071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article engages signage as a medium through which urban stakeholders negotiate the politics of housing redevelopment and gentrification in cities. Focusing on Toronto, we examine housing-related signage in three neighbourhoods where social mix approaches to redevelopment have ushered in gentrification: Parkdale, Regent Park, and Moss Park. We identify three types of signs through which these politics are expressed: notice of proposed development boards, developer-branded placards, and paper posters. By analyzing both the original contents of and ad hoc changes made to select instances of these signs, we identify that gentrification through housing (re)development is <i>contested</i>, <i>de-</i> and <i>re-politicized</i> and <i>resisted</i>. In Parkdale, notice of proposed development boards communicate imminent transformations of the neighbourhood, while constituting a medium through which they are <i>contested</i>. In Regent Park, developer-branded placards <i>depoliticize</i> redevelopment through discursive commodifications of diversity, while also allowing for these commodifications to be <i>repoliticized</i>. In Moss Park, paper posters mobilize grassroots <i>resistance</i> to private condominium development. We argue that more attention should be paid to ad hoc alterations to signage beyond their explicit messaging, as a source of street-level insight into how multi-stakeholder gentrification politics materially unfold in cities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"1152-1171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-2427.70071\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2427.70071\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2427.70071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章将标识作为一种媒介,通过它,城市利益相关者就城市住房重建和中产阶级化的政治进行谈判。以多伦多为例,我们研究了三个社区的住房相关标识,这些社区的社会混合方法已经迎来了中产阶级化:Parkdale、Regent Park和Moss Park。我们确定了三种类型的标志,通过它们来表达这些政治:建议开发委员会的通知,开发商品牌的标语牌和纸质海报。通过分析这些标志的原始内容和临时变化,我们发现,通过住房(再)开发实现的高档化受到了质疑、去政治化和再政治化,并受到了抵制。在Parkdale,拟议开发委员会的通知传达了社区即将发生的转变,同时构成了一种媒介,通过这种媒介,他们受到了争议。在摄政公园,开发商品牌的标语牌通过多样性的话语商品化使重建非政治化,同时也允许这些商品化被重新政治化。在莫斯公园,纸质海报动员草根抵制私人公寓的开发。我们认为,除了明确的信息外,应该更多地关注对标牌的临时修改,作为街头洞察多方利益相关者的高档化政治如何在城市中实质性展开的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
VISUAL NEGOTIATIONS OF GENTRIFICATION IN TORONTO: Contestation, Politicization and Resistance through Urban Signage

This article engages signage as a medium through which urban stakeholders negotiate the politics of housing redevelopment and gentrification in cities. Focusing on Toronto, we examine housing-related signage in three neighbourhoods where social mix approaches to redevelopment have ushered in gentrification: Parkdale, Regent Park, and Moss Park. We identify three types of signs through which these politics are expressed: notice of proposed development boards, developer-branded placards, and paper posters. By analyzing both the original contents of and ad hoc changes made to select instances of these signs, we identify that gentrification through housing (re)development is contested, de- and re-politicized and resisted. In Parkdale, notice of proposed development boards communicate imminent transformations of the neighbourhood, while constituting a medium through which they are contested. In Regent Park, developer-branded placards depoliticize redevelopment through discursive commodifications of diversity, while also allowing for these commodifications to be repoliticized. In Moss Park, paper posters mobilize grassroots resistance to private condominium development. We argue that more attention should be paid to ad hoc alterations to signage beyond their explicit messaging, as a source of street-level insight into how multi-stakeholder gentrification politics materially unfold in cities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: A groundbreaking forum for intellectual debate, IJURR is at the forefront of urban and regional research. With a cutting edge approach to linking theoretical development and empirical research, and a consistent demand for quality, IJURR encompasses key material from an unparalleled range of critical, comparative and geographic perspectives. Embracing a multidisciplinary approach to the field, IJURR is essential reading for social scientists with a concern for the complex, changing roles and futures of cities and regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书