Kemal Bugra Memis, Volkan Kızılgöz, Sonay Aydın, Mukadder Sunar, Mehmet Burak Gökgöz, Önder Durmaz, Ali Osman Gülmez, Berna Hatun Özkan, Mecit Kantarci
{"title":"股骨倾斜角和股骨内侧近端角的规范值:一项基于mri的研究。","authors":"Kemal Bugra Memis, Volkan Kızılgöz, Sonay Aydın, Mukadder Sunar, Mehmet Burak Gökgöz, Önder Durmaz, Ali Osman Gülmez, Berna Hatun Özkan, Mecit Kantarci","doi":"10.12659/MSM.953394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND This study aimed to establish normative values for the femoral inclination angle (FIA) and medial proximal femoral angle (MPFA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which minimizes projectional and rotational errors, in a large cohort. Sex-based and side-to-side comparisons, as well as correlations with age, were also investigated for these proximal femoral angle measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS After exclusion of patients with trauma, infection, prior surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement, avascular necrosis, coxa vara, coxa valga, and low-quality magnetic resonance images, 631 pairs of proximal femurs were retrospectively evaluated for FIA and MPFA measurements. All measurements were performed by consensus between 2 radiologists, then analyzed regarding sex and side differences and correlations with age. RESULTS The mean FIA was 128.53±4.62°, whereas the mean MPFA was 86.62±3.40°. No significant differences were observed between men and women (FIA: P=0.057, MPFA: P=0.050) or between right and left sides (FIA: P=0.178, MPFA: P=0.853). Age was not significantly correlated with either proximal femoral angle measurement. No significant association was found between age and FIA (right: P=0.554, left: P=0.321) or MPFA (right: P=0.954, left: P=0.935). CONCLUSIONS This large MRI-based study provides normative reference values for FIA and MPFA. Neither angle was significantly influenced by sex, side, or age, suggesting that these parameters remain relatively stable across adult populations. These findings may serve as useful reference values for assessment of proximal femoral morphology and preoperative orthopedic planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"32 ","pages":"e953394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normative Values of Femoral Inclination Angle and Medial Proximal Femoral Angle: An MRI-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kemal Bugra Memis, Volkan Kızılgöz, Sonay Aydın, Mukadder Sunar, Mehmet Burak Gökgöz, Önder Durmaz, Ali Osman Gülmez, Berna Hatun Özkan, Mecit Kantarci\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.953394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND This study aimed to establish normative values for the femoral inclination angle (FIA) and medial proximal femoral angle (MPFA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which minimizes projectional and rotational errors, in a large cohort. Sex-based and side-to-side comparisons, as well as correlations with age, were also investigated for these proximal femoral angle measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS After exclusion of patients with trauma, infection, prior surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement, avascular necrosis, coxa vara, coxa valga, and low-quality magnetic resonance images, 631 pairs of proximal femurs were retrospectively evaluated for FIA and MPFA measurements. All measurements were performed by consensus between 2 radiologists, then analyzed regarding sex and side differences and correlations with age. RESULTS The mean FIA was 128.53±4.62°, whereas the mean MPFA was 86.62±3.40°. No significant differences were observed between men and women (FIA: P=0.057, MPFA: P=0.050) or between right and left sides (FIA: P=0.178, MPFA: P=0.853). Age was not significantly correlated with either proximal femoral angle measurement. No significant association was found between age and FIA (right: P=0.554, left: P=0.321) or MPFA (right: P=0.954, left: P=0.935). CONCLUSIONS This large MRI-based study provides normative reference values for FIA and MPFA. Neither angle was significantly influenced by sex, side, or age, suggesting that these parameters remain relatively stable across adult populations. These findings may serve as useful reference values for assessment of proximal femoral morphology and preoperative orthopedic planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"e953394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580174/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953394\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Normative Values of Femoral Inclination Angle and Medial Proximal Femoral Angle: An MRI-Based Study.
BACKGROUND This study aimed to establish normative values for the femoral inclination angle (FIA) and medial proximal femoral angle (MPFA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which minimizes projectional and rotational errors, in a large cohort. Sex-based and side-to-side comparisons, as well as correlations with age, were also investigated for these proximal femoral angle measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS After exclusion of patients with trauma, infection, prior surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement, avascular necrosis, coxa vara, coxa valga, and low-quality magnetic resonance images, 631 pairs of proximal femurs were retrospectively evaluated for FIA and MPFA measurements. All measurements were performed by consensus between 2 radiologists, then analyzed regarding sex and side differences and correlations with age. RESULTS The mean FIA was 128.53±4.62°, whereas the mean MPFA was 86.62±3.40°. No significant differences were observed between men and women (FIA: P=0.057, MPFA: P=0.050) or between right and left sides (FIA: P=0.178, MPFA: P=0.853). Age was not significantly correlated with either proximal femoral angle measurement. No significant association was found between age and FIA (right: P=0.554, left: P=0.321) or MPFA (right: P=0.954, left: P=0.935). CONCLUSIONS This large MRI-based study provides normative reference values for FIA and MPFA. Neither angle was significantly influenced by sex, side, or age, suggesting that these parameters remain relatively stable across adult populations. These findings may serve as useful reference values for assessment of proximal femoral morphology and preoperative orthopedic planning.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper.
Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.