股骨倾斜角和股骨内侧近端角的规范值:一项基于mri的研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Kemal Bugra Memis, Volkan Kızılgöz, Sonay Aydın, Mukadder Sunar, Mehmet Burak Gökgöz, Önder Durmaz, Ali Osman Gülmez, Berna Hatun Özkan, Mecit Kantarci
{"title":"股骨倾斜角和股骨内侧近端角的规范值:一项基于mri的研究。","authors":"Kemal Bugra Memis, Volkan Kızılgöz, Sonay Aydın, Mukadder Sunar, Mehmet Burak Gökgöz, Önder Durmaz, Ali Osman Gülmez, Berna Hatun Özkan, Mecit Kantarci","doi":"10.12659/MSM.953394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND This study aimed to establish normative values for the femoral inclination angle (FIA) and medial proximal femoral angle (MPFA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which minimizes projectional and rotational errors, in a large cohort. Sex-based and side-to-side comparisons, as well as correlations with age, were also investigated for these proximal femoral angle measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS After exclusion of patients with trauma, infection, prior surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement, avascular necrosis, coxa vara, coxa valga, and low-quality magnetic resonance images, 631 pairs of proximal femurs were retrospectively evaluated for FIA and MPFA measurements. All measurements were performed by consensus between 2 radiologists, then analyzed regarding sex and side differences and correlations with age. RESULTS The mean FIA was 128.53±4.62°, whereas the mean MPFA was 86.62±3.40°. No significant differences were observed between men and women (FIA: P=0.057, MPFA: P=0.050) or between right and left sides (FIA: P=0.178, MPFA: P=0.853). Age was not significantly correlated with either proximal femoral angle measurement. No significant association was found between age and FIA (right: P=0.554, left: P=0.321) or MPFA (right: P=0.954, left: P=0.935). CONCLUSIONS This large MRI-based study provides normative reference values for FIA and MPFA. Neither angle was significantly influenced by sex, side, or age, suggesting that these parameters remain relatively stable across adult populations. These findings may serve as useful reference values for assessment of proximal femoral morphology and preoperative orthopedic planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48888,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor","volume":"32 ","pages":"e953394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normative Values of Femoral Inclination Angle and Medial Proximal Femoral Angle: An MRI-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kemal Bugra Memis, Volkan Kızılgöz, Sonay Aydın, Mukadder Sunar, Mehmet Burak Gökgöz, Önder Durmaz, Ali Osman Gülmez, Berna Hatun Özkan, Mecit Kantarci\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/MSM.953394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND This study aimed to establish normative values for the femoral inclination angle (FIA) and medial proximal femoral angle (MPFA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which minimizes projectional and rotational errors, in a large cohort. Sex-based and side-to-side comparisons, as well as correlations with age, were also investigated for these proximal femoral angle measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS After exclusion of patients with trauma, infection, prior surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement, avascular necrosis, coxa vara, coxa valga, and low-quality magnetic resonance images, 631 pairs of proximal femurs were retrospectively evaluated for FIA and MPFA measurements. All measurements were performed by consensus between 2 radiologists, then analyzed regarding sex and side differences and correlations with age. RESULTS The mean FIA was 128.53±4.62°, whereas the mean MPFA was 86.62±3.40°. No significant differences were observed between men and women (FIA: P=0.057, MPFA: P=0.050) or between right and left sides (FIA: P=0.178, MPFA: P=0.853). Age was not significantly correlated with either proximal femoral angle measurement. No significant association was found between age and FIA (right: P=0.554, left: P=0.321) or MPFA (right: P=0.954, left: P=0.935). CONCLUSIONS This large MRI-based study provides normative reference values for FIA and MPFA. Neither angle was significantly influenced by sex, side, or age, suggesting that these parameters remain relatively stable across adult populations. These findings may serve as useful reference values for assessment of proximal femoral morphology and preoperative orthopedic planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"e953394\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13580174/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Science Monitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953394\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.953394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过磁共振成像(MRI)建立股骨倾角(FIA)和股骨内侧近端角(MPFA)的规范值,以最大限度地减少投影和旋转误差。基于性别和侧对侧比较,以及与年龄的相关性,也研究了这些股骨近端角测量。材料和方法在排除创伤、感染、既往手术、晚期骨关节炎、股髋臼撞击、缺血性坏死、髋内翻、髋外翻和低质量磁共振图像的患者后,回顾性评估631对股骨近端FIA和MPFA测量。所有测量均由2名放射科医生一致完成,然后分析性别和侧面差异以及与年龄的相关性。结果平均FIA为128.53±4.62°,平均MPFA为86.62±3.40°。男性和女性之间(FIA: P=0.057, MPFA: P=0.050)或左右两侧之间(FIA: P=0.178, MPFA: P=0.853)无显著差异。年龄与股骨近端角度测量均无显著相关。年龄与FIA(右:P=0.554,左:P=0.321)、MPFA(右:P=0.954,左:P=0.935)无显著相关性。结论:这项基于mri的大型研究为FIA和MPFA提供了规范性参考价值。这两种角度都不受性别、侧面或年龄的显著影响,这表明这些参数在成年人群中保持相对稳定。这些结果可作为评估股骨近端形态和术前矫形计划的有用参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normative Values of Femoral Inclination Angle and Medial Proximal Femoral Angle: An MRI-Based Study.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to establish normative values for the femoral inclination angle (FIA) and medial proximal femoral angle (MPFA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which minimizes projectional and rotational errors, in a large cohort. Sex-based and side-to-side comparisons, as well as correlations with age, were also investigated for these proximal femoral angle measurements. MATERIAL AND METHODS After exclusion of patients with trauma, infection, prior surgery, advanced osteoarthritis, femoroacetabular impingement, avascular necrosis, coxa vara, coxa valga, and low-quality magnetic resonance images, 631 pairs of proximal femurs were retrospectively evaluated for FIA and MPFA measurements. All measurements were performed by consensus between 2 radiologists, then analyzed regarding sex and side differences and correlations with age. RESULTS The mean FIA was 128.53±4.62°, whereas the mean MPFA was 86.62±3.40°. No significant differences were observed between men and women (FIA: P=0.057, MPFA: P=0.050) or between right and left sides (FIA: P=0.178, MPFA: P=0.853). Age was not significantly correlated with either proximal femoral angle measurement. No significant association was found between age and FIA (right: P=0.554, left: P=0.321) or MPFA (right: P=0.954, left: P=0.935). CONCLUSIONS This large MRI-based study provides normative reference values for FIA and MPFA. Neither angle was significantly influenced by sex, side, or age, suggesting that these parameters remain relatively stable across adult populations. These findings may serve as useful reference values for assessment of proximal femoral morphology and preoperative orthopedic planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor
Medical Science Monitor MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
514
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Science Monitor (MSM) established in 1995 is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal which publishes original articles in Clinical Medicine and related disciplines such as Epidemiology and Population Studies, Product Investigations, Development of Laboratory Techniques :: Diagnostics and Medical Technology which enable presentation of research or review works in overlapping areas of medicine and technology such us (but not limited to): medical diagnostics, medical imaging systems, computer simulation of health and disease processes, new medical devices, etc. Reviews and Special Reports - papers may be accepted on the basis that they provide a systematic, critical and up-to-date overview of literature pertaining to research or clinical topics. Meta-analyses are considered as reviews. A special attention will be paid to a teaching value of a review paper. Medical Science Monitor is internationally indexed in Thomson-Reuters Web of Science, Journals Citation Report (JCR), Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI), Index Medicus MEDLINE, PubMed, PMC, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Chemical Abstracts CAS and Index Copernicus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书