{"title":"社会资本还是经济负担?中国农村礼礼支出与收入增长","authors":"Tieqiang Li, Yao Zhang, Qiqi Huang, Yizhu Li","doi":"10.1111/grow.70154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In rural China, ritual gift expenditure is often viewed as expressive consumption, a ritual obligation, or a financial burden embedded in <i>renqing</i> relations. Its possible role as social-capital investment, however, remains less understood. Using an unbalanced panel from the 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 waves of the China Family Panel Studies, this paper examines the association between ritual gift expenditure and rural household income. We estimate household and year fixed-effects models and use mechanism tests to explore possible pathways. The results show a statistically significant positive association. This association remains robust to alternative variable definitions, sample adjustments, and supplementary analyses that partially address endogeneity concerns. Mechanism results provide suggestive evidence for pathways through liquidity buffers, entrepreneurship, non-farm employment, and productive fixed assets. The association is weaker among households with Internet use, consistent with the possibility that digital access reduces reliance on traditional <i>renqing</i> networks. Subsample analyses indicate broadly stable associations, with somewhat larger point estimates among older, low-income, and western households. The findings offer policy implications for rural social-capital governance and income support under China's rural revitalization strategy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":"57 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Capital or Financial Burden? Ritual Gift Expenditure and Income Growth in Rural China\",\"authors\":\"Tieqiang Li, Yao Zhang, Qiqi Huang, Yizhu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/grow.70154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In rural China, ritual gift expenditure is often viewed as expressive consumption, a ritual obligation, or a financial burden embedded in <i>renqing</i> relations. Its possible role as social-capital investment, however, remains less understood. Using an unbalanced panel from the 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 waves of the China Family Panel Studies, this paper examines the association between ritual gift expenditure and rural household income. We estimate household and year fixed-effects models and use mechanism tests to explore possible pathways. The results show a statistically significant positive association. This association remains robust to alternative variable definitions, sample adjustments, and supplementary analyses that partially address endogeneity concerns. Mechanism results provide suggestive evidence for pathways through liquidity buffers, entrepreneurship, non-farm employment, and productive fixed assets. The association is weaker among households with Internet use, consistent with the possibility that digital access reduces reliance on traditional <i>renqing</i> networks. Subsample analyses indicate broadly stable associations, with somewhat larger point estimates among older, low-income, and western households. The findings offer policy implications for rural social-capital governance and income support under China's rural revitalization strategy.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Growth and Change\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Growth and Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.70154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.70154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Social Capital or Financial Burden? Ritual Gift Expenditure and Income Growth in Rural China
In rural China, ritual gift expenditure is often viewed as expressive consumption, a ritual obligation, or a financial burden embedded in renqing relations. Its possible role as social-capital investment, however, remains less understood. Using an unbalanced panel from the 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 waves of the China Family Panel Studies, this paper examines the association between ritual gift expenditure and rural household income. We estimate household and year fixed-effects models and use mechanism tests to explore possible pathways. The results show a statistically significant positive association. This association remains robust to alternative variable definitions, sample adjustments, and supplementary analyses that partially address endogeneity concerns. Mechanism results provide suggestive evidence for pathways through liquidity buffers, entrepreneurship, non-farm employment, and productive fixed assets. The association is weaker among households with Internet use, consistent with the possibility that digital access reduces reliance on traditional renqing networks. Subsample analyses indicate broadly stable associations, with somewhat larger point estimates among older, low-income, and western households. The findings offer policy implications for rural social-capital governance and income support under China's rural revitalization strategy.
期刊介绍:
Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.